you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]fred_red_beans 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (22 children)

With all the hoopla about racial tensions and discrimination about whatever that divides people, Bill Gates looks to be the Nazi like Eugenicist.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

IMO, not just "Nazi-like".

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (20 children)

The Nazis wanted to rid the world of degenerate traits. This fucking shithead wants to CULTIVATE degeneracy through a dysgenics oriented towards the ultra-rich as being the "best" while in fact we know they are the worst human elements, whose entire lives revolve around the self-aggrandizement of megalomaniacs who lack basic decency and regard for life.

Why can't you guys see the difference?

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Alios Hitler = Hitler's brother who are Schicklgrubers. Hitler was taught his oratory speeches by an occultist Jew.

Many Zionists and the anglo-Saxon alliance created the eugenics congresses.

The only people who believe Judaism to be a race are Zionists and Nazis, and both worked together to transfer Jews to Palestine. Think about that.

What did Hitler say in Mein Kampf stalag edition, the only edition authorized by the National Socialists? He said Zionism was a great Jewish ideology.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Of course Hitler would agree to the idea that the jews should have their own nation. He was never much of a hypocrite, and his philosophy was very simple: one people, one land, one nation. What's surprising to you about this? Did Hitler approve of the entire Zionist plan of taking over the world and enslaving the entire human race? That would be a seriously deranged assertion given how hard and well he fought that aspect of their activities both in Germany and outside of it. His actions speak very loudly on this matter, as do his words. No, I think the problem with this is some people reducing zionism to only "a land for the jews" and then saying hitler aggreed with that, and then calling him a zionist for it.

Either he agreed with "zionism" in name as the idea that jews should have their own land, or he agreed with the latter and got branded a zionist. Who knows, maybe there is a third possibility, but to assert that hitler agreed with serving his nation into slavery to the world jewry is absolutely nonsensical.

Might as well call MLK a white supremacist.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

THose are not the principles of the republic. Hitler's ideology is the antithesis of the founders intentions, which is why I'm dumbfounded how many Jews and so many people in the US are fond of him. Eugenics was terrible and the Nazis did execute disabled people. Revisionist Zionists will surely use this ideology their benefit by fronting the nationalistic cause. Michael COllins Piper's book Judas Goat tells of this. That does not mean I disagree with all the economic and social welfare programs he implemented. What is surprising, however, to me is Hitler's past life and his family and the Jews that surrounded him and helped him get into power. Again, it would not make sense if we take into context the Holocaust, but it makes far more sense if the arithmetics don't add up.

Did Hitler approve of the entire Zionist plan of taking over the world and enslaving the entire human race?

No, he didn't but I don't think this is merely a Zionist goal, but more of a free-market goal promoted by bankers and Zionists. But I agree with many of your statements, though I think we have far more to worry about then just rich Jews. Human nature is fallible and anyone can come under the guise of evil. Still though, the more I look into usury and those in power fronting Trump and Wallstreet or the media or tech companies, they all happen to be Jewish. For such as small population, a small subset of Jews are quite good at what they do.

Israel has horrendus wealth inequailty. So, again, the common Jew is not part of this conspiracy but there is a small subset within the Jewish population that does control a large swath of industry and the communication channels.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I just want to follow your reasoning here. Are you saying all the jews interviewed in this video are of the ultra-rich kind?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/SpjbobMPSa1d/?list=favorites&randomize=false

They seem to be just run-of-the-mill parasites to me.

Also, maybe Hitler wrote that "Zionism is a great jewish ideology" in the sense that it uses the Jew traits best: cunning, deceit, theft, and their parasitic nature. In that sense, it truly is. And each people should do the best they can for themselves, that is Hitler's view. I have a much more individualistic view on the future of man, but I must give credit where it is due, his views proved themselves quite thoroughly.

Is it better to gene-edit embryos in a CRISPR machine to prevent genetic disease, or prevent defectives from reproducing? The former might SEEM more humane than the latter, but that's always easy when longer term consequences are utterly unknown. I'm not saying I would implement either of these measures or anything like it, but my knowledge of the hidden workings of life surpasses that of Hitler and his cohorts by orders of magnitude.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think Hitler wrote it because Zionist ideology was very much like NS ideology in that marrying outside race and ethnicity was frowned upon and they both wanted their own ethnic state. Many Zionists worked for thr NS, and the one of the founders of Mossad was formally a National Socialist. Hitler's Jewish past and his associations with Kabbalist occultists Jews who taught him how to speak effectively in front of the public certainly make it clear that he was at the very least using Zionism for his own agenda. That is clear.

There was much treachery in Hitler's Germany. That treachery would certainly be unconstitutional here. The eugenics implemented by the Nazis was disgusting, however, I'm not docking Hitler's social programs or many of the things he did say which I agree with. But anyone can agree with certain things someone says, no matter the person.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed. However, in the second paragraph, you state "here". I believe you must be aware that the Internet is worldwide and that as such, there is no "here" except to mean planet Earth? If you mean "here" as in, where YOU are personally, I would like to take this opportunity to underline the utter ego-geocentricity expressed by the statement, which can only be based off the assumption that others are also in your "here", which is a known falsehood, or that only your "here" matters, which is easy to disprove as well. In the end, I do not grasp what you speak of because of this and am forced to doubt the scope of the mind behind these statements.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Which republic are you referring to when you speak of its founders?

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The old republic. The one that the constitution intended, the one that made it unconstitutional for an incorporated central bank to determine the fiscal policy of the government.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Uh again, WHICH republic? The old Weimar one? I haven't studied its constitution at all, so I wouldn't have anything to say about that, for sure.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I was talking about in the US, that I find it odd that many people praise Hitler or call for a NS system in the US, when it is the antithesis of the republic which we have already lost.

The NS corporatized everything including containment and transfer camps.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It was also the greatest economic miracle ever performed. Remember that well before you lift your nose up in disdain at it.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

In fact, have you read Judas Goats by Michael Collins Piper?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nope, I prefer writing to reading.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

(2)

On one side, the historical fact that Jews, Arabs and Christians have lived peacefully in Palestine for centuries illustrates the antithesis of a present day Jewish state where 40% of its inhabitants do not have political autonomy.

Does a Jewish State have the right to exist? According to the Zionists opinion, yes, for then it would be replaced by a Muslim state. A one state solution would certainly not implement Sharia law or destroy the political and economic self-direction of Jews, rather, it would give legal rights to Palestinians who are presently under apartheid prevented from holding any legitimate political autonomy.

In Palestine, Jews and Muslims, and Christians alike once lived amicably for the most part, side by side, never grasping at each others throats or bombing one another like they do presently. It was only when tens of thousands of foreign Jews from Europe emigrated to Israel were keen on creating a Jewish state.

According to one Jewish commenter:

[In regards to the relation between Tibet and Israel]...I guess you are saying that a real Buddhist would want all Jews to be slaughtered, because without protection, the Muslims and their creators, the Royal families and Vatican […] This world is all staged by the Royal bloodlines and Fallen Angels who stage the killing of Jews and the chasing out of Jews. A real Buddhist would have deep knowing of this agenda subconsciously and know that Jews need a protection because as in the bible, there is a group, Fallen Angels who run the Royal bloodlines, descendants from the Romans who killed Jesus, who don't want Jews on this planet. […] They always forget that Muslims have fifty countries and then sneer at the fact that Jews have one! It's all mind control by the Nazi factions headed by the Nazi's who reside in the underground bases in Antarctica. See you-tube videos on this ! Jews need protection!

Evidently, this women mixes ridiculous conspiracy theory with half-truths, possibly misled, to form the opinion that Jews need this state because of their historical persecution, disregarding the plight of the Palestinian Arabs and Christians. I am not sure what articles she is reading, but clearly the pseudo-conspiracy theories are a salient tactic in instilling fear. If anything, an ethno-state of Jews would provide an easy target for any megalomaniac to destroy. Yeshua in prophecy makes it wuite clear

What is true is that the founder of political Zionism, Theodor Herzl, a friend of the anti-Semites and father of the World Zionist Congress was already promoting Jewish emigration to Israel, hoping eventually, Jews would turn to Christianity. Even before Herzl, Zionism was being talked about in Rabbi circles, particularly Hasidics who thought it would take a war to emigrate Jews to Palestine.

In the 1930’s David ben Gurion stated that he wanted a pogrom against the European Jews to drive them into Palestine. The Royal Families were intimately connected with many Jews, who were financiers and politicians -- such as Benjamin Disraeli, a reformed Jew that particularly despised assimilationist Jews.

At one point in time, the hereditary trait of Jewishness, ceased to exist. Reformed Judaism, having in many ways denied the religion of Judaism, particularly because of Jewish persecution in the 15th and 16th centuries by the ‘old Marrano’s’ having imposed blood libel laws, introduced a new, but quite old religious idea, “purity of blood.” to the Jews.

Bare of the religious thought, Jews based ideology on the purity of their blood, very much like how Zionist Jews do now in Israel. In fact, many Orthodox Jews, excluding some of their racist doctrine, are against Zionism. And yet, the reformed Jews having disowned their religion have then taken up the nationalistic, and blood purity/race opinions of Jews during biblical times. Hence, Zionism is about Jewish culture and so-called Jewish race, and it is presently bare of any religious connotation.

The Zionistic Rothschild family are large shareholders in Reuters and the Associated Press (AP), the two biggest media agencies in the world. They have a controlling share in the Royal Dutch oil company, the Bank of England and the LBMA (London Bullion Market Association). The Balfour Declaration (1917) is an official letter from the British Government Foreign Secretary James Balfour to Baron Rothschild. It states that: “His Majesty’s government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object.”

So, we have here prominent, rich mostly-non religious Jewish bankers who have paved the way for the creation of the state of Israel. I ask others here: when atheistical Jews, like the neoconservatives advocate for a Jewish ethno-state, or the many revisionist Zionists who base the pillaging of a former state of peaceful inhabitants, Jews included, on their hereditary connection to a two thousand year old ancestry, that should really only encompass the land of Judah, of which they cannot prove, in fact, which is impossible to prove, what does that then tell us?

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

(1)

Revisionist Zionism became much like the blood purity ideology of the Jesuits who wished to bar memorialists from their society. It is the hereditary of a Holy Land, Israel, that they cannot prove, whilst they throw out all religious belief in favor of a right-wing nationalistic culture. But we also have Labour Zionism, still in many ways non-religious and based on fervent ethno-centrism. These beliefs can be read in the Zionist World Congress, where they parrallel the similarities between Zionist belief and those of the ethno-centrism in National Socialist Germany.

This relationship might seem warped but it makes perfect sense once you understand Jewish persecution in the 15th and 16th centuries. Societies fought among themselves and poor Jews were caught in the middle. From that point on, Zionism, lacking religious precedent, latched onto blood purity and race, which their Germanic opponents thus used to further persecute them via categorization. Many wealthy Zionists would then befriend so-called anti-Semites, hoping assimilation Jews would be persecuted so that they would emmigrate to Israel. The majority of these Jews were observant Torah Jews that do not preach the erection of a Sanhedrin w/ the accompanying Noahide laws, which would utilize a procurator to behead idolatrous Christians.

The parallels between egocentrism and ethnocentrism, and unfortunately I have never seen you mention the Palestine plight, but either way, there are comparisons to be made between these two beliefs of chosenness --- Jews believe to be chosen --- which is quite revealing when one compares the many players involved in making right-wing ideology and nationalism a living and breathing culture. Innocent Jews then are propagandized by these beliefs and so too are non-Jews. It isn't a coincidence that Mossad helped to get started by a former National Socialist turned Israeli/CIA agent who was quite close to Hitler. It illustrates that revisionist Zionism is very similar in ideology to National Socialism, which is why many Zionists respected NS, and wanted their own ethnostate, even calling for Jewish persecution hoping for emigration to Palestine.

Revisionist Zionists are ultimately funding these movements to push people in general, especially the Jewish Diaspora towards the Zionist and nationalistic cause. The Chabad sect, once persecuted by Bolshevik Jews, being that they are fervently Zionistic believe all Jews are part of a national heritage. Revisionist Zionism's goal, is the religious goal of Judaism without the religious beliefs. Impostors, they are. Their goal is to erect, and has been for hundreds of years, the 'Supreme Court of Mankind', as predicted by Israeli's first prime minister Benjamin ben Gurion, in Jerusalem, as prophesized in Isaiah.

That is, the world capital will be situated in the heart of Israel, where all people's will pay homage to the Jewish people, ie. the Messiah. Or in the Jewish Cabalists belief, the Temple will have doors for all the religions of the world. The Supreme Court of Mankind, nevertheless, according to Ben-Gurion will sort out all nationstate issues, and Solomon's Temple will be errected where all religions will worship within it. There are already leaked plans by mystical reformed Jewish organizations, illustrating this. Hence, the temple will be open to all religions, not just Judaism. Russia will then become a Federated state, which will have great relations with Israel as well as BRIC states. A multilateral world will emerge and the west, particularly the U.S. will become a half-baked welfare state.

That is what reformed and revisionist Zionists are hoping to achieve. The new economic order is coming, and whilst they distract us with politics, the G7 countries and the international bankers such as the Bank for International Settlements are planning to implode the economy in the west, in hope that these countries succumb to a multilateral, multipolar world.

So, ask yourself, what is the anglo-american propaganda that many have become accustomed to today? Might it be, the innocent victim revisionism of today, ie. exceptionalism? There is no nuance when it comes to the power struggle between Germany and the allies concerning WW2.

"Poor Germany was destroyed and has become the victim of hate", they say.

The victim of what many revisionists call a 'Jewish conspiracy', but is that really what happened? Why, is it today, that we have many Zionists and Hasbara shills pushing the 'Hitler did nothing wrong' meme, or that he was innocent of starting the war.

Clearly, all powers, not just Germany had a hand in fomenting the war and Germany certainly did not cause WWII alone as evidenced by the great book 'The War That had Many Fathers.' But revisionism is leading us to believe that Hitler was some sort of saint or a leader to follow and look up to. One should research Hitler's past as well as his brother Alios Hitler and father's surname Schicklgruber.

For instance, Unzreview.com, a periodical owned by a so-called "self-hating" Jew as well as the "Jews for Hitler" organization, praises Hitler as if he is some sort of God. They negate to state that like the allied powers, Germany was just as thuggish and brutal at destroying, murdering and looting for territory expanse and power. Why cannot people understand this?

All great powers did this for their own geopolitical gain but only a few walked off with the prize and so were free to write history as they saw fit.

Racism and supremacism is still evident today, espeically in the US, and Israel. There is clearly a 'blood purity', egocentric, ethnocentric belief that is distorting revisionists' minds, which has slowly gained momentum over the years, pushed by, of all people, certain Zionist sects.

Furthermore, the extreme Hitler as a God rhetoic revisionism is coming exclusively out of the anglo-american Zionist country alliances, probably as an counter-intelligence, perception management Operation. Ask yourself; what does that mean? It certainly is not coming from continental Europe, where, intrestingly, Hitler is not seen as a perverted, fire-breathing demon, despite the German army occupying European countries who still, presently, are level-headed in their analysis!

Modern Americanism and modern exceptionalism, go hand-in-hand with egocentrism and ethnocentrism; Zionists are an easily observed parallel. Hence, this obsession with race and racism is still rampant today and seems, at least in my view, to be a stepping stone for another conflict down the road. Zionists will certainly utilzie these ideologies to garner support for their cause.

Moreover, in Palestine, Jews have peacefully lived among Arabs and Christians for centuries. The relentless onslaught of Zionistic talking points propagandized by media, particularly right-leaning Israeli media corporations but so too American media conglomerates and their talking mouth pundits, disregarding the Palestinian plight, has led to a furthering divide in America. A country that has given Israel, to the tune of over a trillion dollars in aid. That is 200,000 dollars for each 5 person family loving in Israel. Free of debt to be mortgaged to unborn generations in the US.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

(Intro)

Ezra was a proto-Zionist, and largely the old Testement was created as propaganda to obtain what scribes and Levites thought was rightfully theirs, i.e., land. Ezra called himself the “Secretary of the Law of the God of heaven” (Ezra 7:21), mandated by the king of Persia. He was soon joined by Nehemiah, a Persian court official of Judean origin.

In Laurent Guyenot's book, he writes:

The biblical text was designed to establish Ezra’s legitimacy based on Moses the ancestor, as well as Josiah the last king before the Exile. It is built on a mise en abime that goes like this: First, Moses receives from Yahweh the Law (of Deuteronomy) and urges the Hebrew people to “faithfully obey the voice of Yahweh your God, by keeping and observing all his commandments” (Deuteronomy 28:1-20).

Secondly, Josiah receives from the high priest that same “Book of the Law,” the “Law of Moses” (that had once fallen from the sky but now emerges from the dust), and summons “the whole populace, high and low” to hear it being read (2 Kings 23:2).

Thirdly, Ezra brings back from Babylon this very “Book of the Law of Moses” and summons the families of the settlers to read it to them “from dawn till noon” (Nehemiah 8:1-3).

The first two episodes are mythical, only the third is historical. For a historian critical of his sources, the only near-certainty is that, around 458 BCE, a clan claiming to issue from a lineage of Yahwistic Judean priests and installed in Babylon won from the Persians the right to establish a semi-autonomous state in Palestine; and that in order to dominate the local population, they developed a version of history presenting themselves as legitimate heirs of an ancient tradition.

Judah’s fornication with his daughter-in-law Tamar, dressed as a prostitute (Genesis 38), is depicted as the God-blessed action that produced the tribe of Judah.

In a new edict of Darius authorizing the rebuilding of the temple, and ordering gigantic burnt offerings financed by “the royal revenue.” Darius warned that “if anyone disobeys this order, a beam is to be tom from his house, he is to be impaled on it and his house is to be reduced to a rubbish-heap for his offense”

“...all members of the people of Israel in my kingdom, including their priests and Levites, who freely choose to go to Jerusalem,” and to rule over “the whole people of Trans-Euphrates [territories west to the Euphrates]

Very much like the Greater Israel porject Zionists seek today.

And on anyone who will not comply with the Law of your God and the Law of the king let sentence be swiftly executed, whether it be death, banishment, fine or imprisonment.”

Thus ends what is presented as “the text of the document which King Artaxerxes gave to Ezra” (7:11-26).

So, those who do not comply with their law of God will be executed.

...the hanging of Haman and his ten sons and the massacre of 75,000 Persians are often conflated in Jewish tradition with the extermination of the Amalekites and the brutal execution of their king. The Torah reading on the morning of Purim is taken from the account of the battle against the Amalekites, which ends with the conclusion that “Yahweh will be at war with Amalek generation after generation” (Exodus 17:16)

...will fall prostrate before you, faces to the ground, and lick the dust at your feet,” whereas Israel’s oppressors will “eat their own flesh [and] will be as drunk on their own blood” (49:23-26); “For the nation and kingdom that will not serve you will perish, and the nations will be utterly destroyed” (60:12);“Strangers will come forward to feed your flocks, foreigners be your ploughmen and vinedressers; but you will be called ‘priests of Yahweh’ and be addressed as ‘ministers of our God.’ You will feed on the wealth of nations, you will supplant them in their glory” (61:5-6); “You will suck the milk of nations, you will suck the wealth of kings” (60:16).

The Hasmoneans launched a vast enterprise of conquest, absorbing not only Samaria, but Galilee in the north, Idumea in the south and Moabitide in the east, imposing circumcision there. Galilee and Idumea were converted to the centralized cult of Yahweh in Jerusalem, probably by hardy Judean settlers. But the Samaritans, who considered themselves the true Israelites, refused to forsake their temple of Mount Gerizim for the Jerusalem one.


Torah Jews still follow a supremacist ideology. The Old Testement is evidently filled with supremacy. Plus, Torah Jews still follow the Oral Law of the Talmud, as it is the beginings of Judaism. Jesus was the new covenant.

1.The Talmud is the most vital manuscript of conventional Judaism.

2.The Talmud is the basic tool for learning the ethics behind the customs of Judaism.

3.The Torah is most widely known as the five books of Moses.

4.The Torah is the entirety of Jewish laws and traditions.

5.There is also no such thing as the New Testament in the scriptures of the Jews, other than the Jewish apostles.

6.Moses received the Torah as a written text alongside an oral version or commentary.

7.This oral section is now what the Jews call the Talmud.

“The Talmud is the most vital manuscript of the conventional Judaism religion.”

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I hear you have a neighbor who is pretty cool. ;-)

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Common Jews are not the problem though. They are mistaken and/or propagandized everyday by revisionist Zionists.

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You and I are in complete agreement on this topic.

Jews are highly pressured to conform with in their subculture. It's a surprisingly insular.

It's difficult to actually understand the extent of this pressure unless you personally know someone who is Jewish.

I won't elaborate on the internal 'sticks and carrots' that are sometimes discussed internally.
Most quietly oppose, but won't risk it.

This is understandable.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I dare say they ARE the problem. IF they outed the whole thing by these so-called "false jews" then the whole world would know and it would be game over. The fact that they don't shows they are complicit.