you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]iraelmossadreddit[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The are saying it's a TOS violation. I looked through the rules and we didn't break anything!

[–]happysmash27 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

According to the /r/Libertarian mods, it is a TOS violation to criticise rules against the distribution of child pornography, even in the context of quoting oneself to explain the reason for a past ban somewhere else. As a strong advocate for freedom of speech and information, I've learned that it is best to pretend pedophiles and child pornography don't exist, at least on Reddit, because when I extend my beliefs on freedom of speech and information to that, even in the context of fictional work, it ends up a lot more controversial than I could have ever imagined. I guess they are censoring everything related to pedophiles now, even things opposing them?