all 36 comments

[–]kokolokoNightcrawler 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

If you don't want AIDS , don't go to Reddit, simple as.

[–]Canbot 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

This looks like someone is trying to get r/conspiracy banned on the grounds that they dox people. If they don't delete the doxing they get removed, if they do these trolls accuse them of censorship.

[–]iraelmossadreddit[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

there was no doxxing. they just posted a public address to a pizza delivery place.

[–]WhoFlu 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Perhaps true, but that's not how Reddit works. If Reddit hates your subreddit, they will use anything they can to take down your subreddit, so moderators often have to be overly-cautious when it comes to certain types of content if they're under the Reddit admin's microscope.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Oh, so you just posted claims about them and then gave the address where they work so they can be found and shot over the claims you made. Yeah, totally not doxxing. How retarded are you?

[–]iraelmossadreddit[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

he go back to reddit faggot. no such thing happened. they posted the address that is public on google review https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/ggmcxi/dont_let_this_get_buried_uedgewla_was_onto/ nina inc pizza delivery

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

SO
DON'T
POST
ADDRESSES.

No one cares that you think it should be ok for you to post this address because you know better than everyone and have your own personal opinions on what addresses are ok to post.

[–]iraelmossadreddit[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

there is nothing wrong with posting an address. the rules say don't post personal information. posting an address to a pizza delivery place is fine. no one was even linking a name to it.

[–]MarquisBoniface 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

there is nothing wrong with posting an address. the rules say don't post personal information. posting an address to a pizza delivery place is fine. no one was even linking a name to it.

I'm getting a headache just reading this shit.

WHY THE FUCK do you insist on posting the address?

That is the one fucking rule, the single fucking rule, don't post addresses and shit like that. Yes it's a stupid rule, but shills look for pretexts to get subs shut down enough as it is.

WHAT POSSIBLE GOAL does that achieve? It certainly doesn't work making the point more effectively.

[–]iraelmossadreddit[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That is the one fucking rule, the single fucking rule, don't post addresses

no it's not. you can post a business address.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

stop defending pedos

[–]MarquisBoniface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

"We can only stop the (threat) if we do (rule_violating_thing)"

The best thing to do, if you actually want to do something about it, is raise public awareness and build pressure for scrutiny.

Btw, I say this as the person who made sure that Buzzfeed Ryan Broderick had his tweets archived, I intentionally left a "signature" style (archived it twice within a 20 minute interval, unnecessary) so I could reference it later:

http://archive.is/https://twitter.com/broderick/status/240906039602577410?s=19

I later went on a rant about how I was shocked no one archived it before me, then detailed how archive services get throttled by pro-establishment shills. I followed up that anti-establishment critics need to overcome all boundaries and find a way to get results.

Results meaning evidence and actually convincing arguments for explaining these issues to others in society at large.

Dumb fucks like you and this other retard quite literally galvanize a DEFENSE of Pedos, by insisting on providing them with a defense, that lunatics are out on a literal witch hunt

Creeps like Alefantis are like parasites who feed off of the galvanized defense idiots (and/or subversive shills) like you provide, so they can rally up their establishment defense.

Notice Alefantis and co got portrayed as victims after that idiot (and possible shill) went to the restaurant with a gun, which resulted in shutting down conversations of pizzagate:

http://archive.vn/cNO5K

What happened when ‘Pizzagate’ came to my restaurant

By James Alefantis

April 20, 2017

TL:DR: You and the other dumbfuck are (knowingly or unknowingly) providing fuel for the fire pedophiles use to defend themselves from legitimate critiques, while adding nothing of value to the critiques. I, unlike you, want results, therefore I disavow you subversive retards and encourage other anti-pedophile people to do the same.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

tldr but stop defending pedos ok? blocked.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Sounds like you want evidence and facts obfuscated via a doxxing loophole.

[–]iraelmossadreddit[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The are saying it's a TOS violation. I looked through the rules and we didn't break anything!

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Did you post personally identifying information? Reddit is not the FBI, has no ability to verify your claims, and could be used to attack someone by proxy using faked evidence. So if you did in fact post addresses as the comments claim, then you very much did violate TOS.

[–]iraelmossadreddit[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

nope. I just linked a thread where they got banned. the thread just a had public business listed as pizza delivery. it only had two rewiewers of the business. one had wrote a lot of reviews for places in israel which I found very odd.

[–]happysmash27 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

According to the /r/Libertarian mods, it is a TOS violation to criticise rules against the distribution of child pornography, even in the context of quoting oneself to explain the reason for a past ban somewhere else. As a strong advocate for freedom of speech and information, I've learned that it is best to pretend pedophiles and child pornography don't exist, at least on Reddit, because when I extend my beliefs on freedom of speech and information to that, even in the context of fictional work, it ends up a lot more controversial than I could have ever imagined. I guess they are censoring everything related to pedophiles now, even things opposing them?

[–]iraelmossadreddit[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is a fucking public business adress with google reviews. that is not agaisnt the rules.

from amosjew the mod Again, you'll have to work that out with Reddit Administration.

[–]FormosaOolong 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Wow, new low for reddit.

[–]iraelmossadreddit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

yeah there was one good mod on /r/conspiracy and then they got him admin banned. it's been a complete purge. check out the bs one of the /r/conspiracy mods has been posting 26k upvotes! https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/gfipuz/ladies_and_gentlemen_they_got_em_gregory_travis/

[–]hennaojichan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What do you expect from a POS site like reddit?

[–]Lukecis 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Most likely because reddit is moderated solely by pedophiles, neckbeards powertripping and paid shills.

[–]happysmash27 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

pedophiles

Completely and utterly false, in my experience. If Reddit was moderated by pedophiles, I would probably be allowed say that child pornography should be legal to distribute (as an advocate for freedom of speech and information, I said this in the past), but I am not even allowed to say that fictional child pornography should be able to be distributed, or even describe an old ban I got due to saying this, even in the context of saying why I was banned (in the case of /r/Libertarian, where my context was removed for supposedly violating the rules I was criticising) or even trying to change my view (which I have gotten some cascading permabans for trying to do, if I recall correctly). I make no claims on whether this opinion was justified or not, but what I can say for certain is that one is usually not allowed to express it on Reddit, and for this reason, I believe that most Reddit moderators are not in fact pedophiles, and are so highly opposed to them that one can't even get close to defending them.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

looks llike voat is shut down because of this too

[–]noseburp 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)