all 3 comments

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

/u/magnora, /u/Jesus.

it's an interesting hypothesis.

Certainly worth considering.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Fetzer is a shill ; I won't entertain Paysters.

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You keep claiming that.

Fetzer's mini nuke theory is being challenged.

I have a similar suspicion about the veracity of nukes actually being legit. The timing was too convenient, and the circumstantial evidence is questionable.

The guest makes a reasonable case for the nuke hoax. There are a few WW2 related hoaxes that are still "researched" as if they're legit.

Hiroshima residents never had the cancer they should have...

The "Someone would have talked" argument applies to numerous other confirmed hoaxes.

They're still having terrorism trials for 9/11, so these PsyOps never seem to end.

It's well worth considering.