Roger Stone EXPOSED

submitted by Vigte from youtube.com

all 6 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Vigte[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lots of spelling mistakes in the auto-generated subtitles, nothing I can do about it.

When you type the general sounding name into google, it will usually find them properly for you, at least.

[–]RickC-137 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Now do one for all the Dems connections to China and Dem/Romney connections to Ukraine corruption, because that's where the real story is. These people say, "LOOK OVER THERE!" and you turn your head and say, "Where?! WHERE?!".

Your next trick will be pissing on the graves of people that tried to testify against Hillary.

[–]Vigte[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

You're "red pilled" I presume - know all about the CFR and the atheo-communist globalist agenda?

Yeah, me too, it's disgusting - all the merging with machines, human experimentation and social degeneracy.

Turns out what the right says about the left is true - they're monsters.

It just also happens that what the left says about the right is also correct.

Go back to researching both sides, like you did when corrupt ol' bush was president - before maga and Q said just what you wanted to hear and you thought they were on your side.

To be honest though, you probably won't and you'll prove my reply is more than you deserve.

[–]RickC-137 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What do you think I live in a hole? Do you not think that I don't pay attention? I watch everything 1st hand.

The globalists are rabidly against being brought out into the light and you are pointing the finger at people that are trying to do so.

[–]Vigte[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

globalists are rabidly against being brought out into the light

by the right/Trump/Q, you haven't made exactly clear who your "leader" is, but it's inconsequential really. While semantically correct, you again miss the bigger point: if you think the control-structure of the right-wing is in any way "on your side", as your comments suggest, then you've only been sucked back into the two-sided game.

The right and the left are both being made militant and combative to set up for the coming conflict - and you're doing their work for them.

Semantically speaking, you're acting out the definition of a pawn.

I don't care which side is doing the evil-deeds, I'll point it out. Just so happens it's both sides, go figure.

[–]RickC-137 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

If it wasn't for so many Anti-American fucksticks out there I wouldn't have to react, but unfortunately there are plenty cannon fodder dickwads that say "yay" to tearing our country down. Get them under control and we wouldn't have a problem, but you can't just sit back and watch them destroy this great country.

If somebody attacks us, you can't put those protecting us in the same category even if that was their plan from the beginning. We are all pawns but Roger Stone certainly is one too and you aren't naming the oligarchs that are pulling the strings.

Where Roger Stone was going most certainly goes further up the chain than attacking Roger Stone that's for sure.