all 19 comments

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

they are plannign for Sanders to win against Biden and lose against Trump, in a fair and square election.

The most improbable statement.

Bernie supporters assume increased public participation in politics, and policy.

The oligarchs have agenda 2030 deadlines, and they won't risk interference.

Although, the could leverage Bernie's supporters to push through disastrous climate change policies.
Global warming is a hoax.

[–]Jesus[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am honestly starting to think Biden was meant to lose the nomination against Sanders, if anyone wants evidence that Sanders has a worse war record than Trump; Link below :)

https://saidit.net/s/conspiracy/comments/31hg/in_response_to_progressives_who_support_bernie/

https://mobile.twitter.com/maddow/status/1235354378715844609

On a side note, I think Trump is far worse than Sanders considering all of Trump's close friends are the 9/11 perpetrators.

Nevertheless, all these 10 million dollar reporters interviewing Sanders, when before, during Obama's so-called progressive, anti-war, anti-wall street election campaign, Ron Paul was not only shunned but completely ignored by the media despite the veteran supporters and anti-war activists.

I'm still under the assumption that Paul never wanted to win and possibly was a controlled opposition or at the very least did not want to rock the boat. His son has countlessly shown his warmongering ways to the tune of the neoconservative doctrine, and Ron, has been an advocate f Israel.

But nevertheless, Obama was considered the anti-establishment candidate and did none of the things he promised once elected; bailing out banks to the tune of trillions with taxpayer money.

I cannot help but see a bonafide Obama in Sanders. His past voting record on foreign policy issues illustrates a neoliberal stance, rather than the modern progressive stance.

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I mean the trend illustrates that there is on avg. global warming but compared to thousands of years ago and the grand scheme of things, it is a moot issue at where we currently are. The problem is the time period in which warming has increased, whoch is far faster than, as the say, the ecosystems can account for. Ocean acidification and deforestation are also an issue to many scientists.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

the trend illustrates that there is on avg. global warming but compared to thousands of years ago and the grand scheme of things, it is a moot issue at where we currently are.

The current trend is consistent with 1000 years of incremental natural change.

20cm/century sea level rise
Or...
8in/100 yrs
Or...
0.08 in/yr.

Insignificant.

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Not really, the increase of warming has been at a faster rate in the past 150 yrs.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

stop making unsourced statements

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

warming has been at a faster rate in the past 150 yrs.

Has greenhouse gas and pollution led to an increase in rate, we don't know. Now if we were to compare to say 11,000 years ago, it would be a moot point.

https://assets.weforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/JMA-chart.jpg

https://inhabitat.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2016/08/Global-Temperatures-889x293.jpg

The current trend is a a larger increase over a shorter period of time, HOWEVER, catosrophic events have occured and the ecosystem was able to evolve and change even during these events.

So, climate change, which is a dumb word to choose if you want to proof others that pollution and greenhouse gases leads to warmer temps., can easily be mitigated and is likely a non-issue, for now.

Deforestatin and pollution are the issues of today.

The global average temperatures in the pre-industrial era fluctuated but rates of warming were fastest in the late 20th century.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The hockey stick sham was debunked.

The scientists making the claim were held in contempt of court for withholding the data.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Deforestation is a problem disaster..

Acidification is a hoax. The Shell forming crustaceans are just fine.

Man made warming is a hoax.

Environmental contamination is a disaster.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Sanders proposes all the 2030 plans and even blamed Da'esh and Corona on global warming.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

ISIS is Isreal.

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yes and no. Israel Secret Intelligenxe Service. I think they are more of an asset or tool as they are with the US.

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

no, isis is al-qaeda and al qaeda were originally the mujahedeens. they were created by america, not israel. stop lying, shill.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

ISIS, is AL Qaeda, even thoug hAl Nusra Front, has fought ISIS on numerous occasions. It is tribal infighting after all. The US state Department and the Israeli government often use these terror groups for their own geopolitical agendas. There are many articles proving Israel helped ISIS and their wounded, when it meant a barrier between them and Syria.

Research SITE intelligence.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Israel and the Neocons want all Arabs infighting as shown in their Securing the Realm document. Balkanization is the key here, and it works in Israel and the US's favor.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Sanders proposes all the 2030 plans

Um... This is a problem.

Actually, this is a complete deal breaker, and I have been entertaining conflicting ideas...

GO TRUMP 2020!!! (and quit being a hoe to Isreal...)

[–]Jesus[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So, you are pro-Israel? And are going to vote for Trump, I hope you're being sarcastic, are you? Trump is a criminal and friends with the 9/11 perpetrators, ie. the Likudniks.

We have given Israel over a 4 year period trillions of dollars whilst American people suffer, and that aid inflates our economy but not Israel because a bond account is held at the FED.

Overall we have given 200,000 dollars to every 5 person family in Israel in the last 40 years.


And again, if you're pro Trump, how the hell can you possibly believe Likudniks did 9/11? Trump is a lackey for these criminals, it makes no sense, especially from you.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Obama, if he was to run today, would look far more progressive on many of his stances than Sanders.

Yeah, Obama pretended to be anti-war but Bernie isn't even talking about it.

[–]Jesus[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Which shows us what? That he's a slivering snake, who could easily change his stances once elected. And if he doesn't win the nomination, it is an easy wing for ZioCon Trump and his 9/11 perp. friends. Nobody is going to vote for Biden, also a ZioCon, so if he wins the nomination, Bernie supporters are out of the race. If anything, this election will determine who can see through these staged, highly controlled elections and who cannot.