Posted by Laurent Guyénot on May 30, 2016
I recommend everyone buys and/or reads his books online.
John et Robert were so atuned that they rarely needed to finish their sentence to understand each other, said Arthur Schlesinger
"The Arabs are most concerned about the great increase in the Jews in Palestine: 80,000 in 1948. The Arabs have always feared this encroachment and maintain that the Jews will never be satisfied with just their section of Palestine, but will gradually move to overpower the rest of the country and will eventually move onto the enormously wealthy oil lands.” --- Robert Kennedy, 1948
On June 6th 1968, just hours after Robert Kennedy got shot in Los Angeles, Jerry Cohen of the Los Angeles Times was able to report,in a front-page article, that the assassin, Sirhan Bishara Sirhan, was a Palestinian refugee whose family had been expelled from West Jerusalem in 1948, and who was “described by acquaintances as a ‘virulent’ anti-Israeli” (Cohen opted for“virulent anti-Semite” in another article for the The Salt Lake Tribune).
“Investigation and disclosures from persons who knew him best revealed [him] as a young man with a supreme hatred for the state of Israel.”
Cohen infers that:
"Senator Kennedy […] became a personification of that hatred because of his recent pro-Israeli statements.”
He was referring to a newspaper clipping found in Sirhan’s pocket, quoting Robert’s following statement:
“the United States should without delay sell Israel the 50 Phantom jets she has so long been promised.”
Cohen further learnt from Los Angeles Mayor Samuel Yorty that:
"About three weeks ago the young Jordanian refugee accused of shooting Sen. Robert Kennedy wrote a memo to himself, […]
The memo said: ‘Kennedy must be assassinated before June 5, 1968’—the first anniversary of the six-day war in which Israel humiliated three Arab neighbors, Egypt, Syria and Jordan.”
Almost 50 years later, several questions are still unanswered.
Did SirhanSirhan kill Robert Kennedy?
1.) First question: Did Sirhan really kill Robert Kennedy? Ballistic and forensic evidence suggest that, in fact, none of Sirhan’s bullets hit Kennedy. For according to the autopsy report of Chief Medical Examiner-Coroner Dr. Thomas T. Noguchi, Robert Kennedy was killed by a gunshot wound to the brain, fired from behind the right ear at point blank range, following an upward angle. Nogushi has restated his conclusion in his 1983 memoirs, Coroner, and his conclusion has been backed by other professionals.Yet the sworn testimony of twelve shooting witnesses established that Robert has never turned his back on Sirhan and that Sirhan was five to six feet away from his target when he fired. The counting of all the bullet impacts in the pantry, and those that wounded five people around Kennedy, shows that at least twelve bullets had been fired, while Sirhan’s gun carried only eight.
On April 23, 2011, attorneys William Pepper and his associate, Laurie Dusek, have gathered all this evidence and more in a 58-page file to the Court of California, asking for a revision of Sirhan’s trial. They documented major irregularities in the 1968 trial, including the fact that the bullet presented to the court in 1968 as the fatal bullet was not the one that Dr Nogushi had extracted from Kennedy’s brain. They have also provided a computer analysis of audio recordings during the shooting, made by engineer Philip Van Praag in 2008, which confirms that two guns are heard.
There has always been strong suspicions that the second shooter was Thane Eugene Cesar, a security guard hired by the hotel, who was set behind Kennedy at the time of shooting, and seen with his pistol drawn by several witnesses, one of whom, Don Schulman, positively saw him fire. Cesar was never investigated, even though he did not conceal his hatred for the Kennedys, who according to him had “sold the country down the road to the commies.”
Was Sirhan hypnotized?
Even granting that Sirhan was Robert Kennedy’s assassin, another fact raises disturbing questions: witnesses noticed that Sirhan seemed like in a trance, and showed extraordinary strength for his size when physically contained. After the shooting, he appeared disoriented and exhausted.
More importantly, Sirhan Sirhan has always claimed that he has never had any recollection of his act, although he had been told by his attorney that it would be futile to deny the fact.
"I had and continue to have no memory of the shooting of Senator Kennedy.”
He also claims to have no memory of “many things and incidents which took place in the weeks leading up to the shooting.”
He also has no memory of writing in his notebook the incoherent words used as proof of his premeditation:
"My determination to eliminate R.F.K. is becoming more the more of an unshakable obsession . . . R.F.K. must die – RFK must be killed. Robert F. Kennedy must be assassinated R.F.K. must be assassinated . . . R.F.K. must be assassinated assassinated . . . Robert F. Kennedy must be assassinated before 5 June 68 Robert F. Kennedy must be assassinated I have never heard please pay to the order of ofofofof.”
Psychiatric experties, including lie-detector tests, have confirmed that Sirhan’s amnesia is not faked.
In 2008, Harvard University professor Daniel Brown, a noted expert in hypnosis and trauma memory loss, interviewed Sirhan for a total of 60 hours, and concluded that Sirhan, who belongs to the category of “high hypnotizables,” acted unvoluntarily under the effect of hypnotic suggestion:
"...his firing of the gun was neither under his voluntary control, nor done with conscious knowledge, but is likely a product of automatic hypnotic behavior and coercive control.”
During his sessions with Dr. Brown, Sirhan could remember having been accompanied, and aroused, by a young woman, before suddenly finding himself at a shooting range. According to Brown, Sirhan responded,
“to a specific hypnotic cue given to him by that woman to enter ‘range mode,’ during which Mr. Sirhan automatically and involuntarily responded with a ‘flashback’ that he was shooting at a firing range at circle targets.”
Months after Sirhan recalled these details, attorney William Pepper found an entry in the Police file that showed that Sirhan had visited a police firing range and signed the register just days before the assassination. He was handled by a man who did not sign the register, whom Sirhan also described a man with a turned down moustache and foreign accent, who instructed him.
One person who may have been involved in Sirhan’s programming, and who reportedly bragged about it to two prostitutes, is famed hypnotist William Joseph Bryan Jr.. Bryan made no secret of having worked for the Air Force in what was classified as the:
^ ^ ^ William Joseph Bryan jr.
Bryan’s biggest claim to fame, which he bragged about all the time, was how he had hypnotized and deprogrammed the Boston Strangler, allegedly Albert Di Salvo who thereafter confessed to the crime. In the notebook found at his home, Sirhan Sirhan had written, in the same style reminiscent of automatic writing as other incriminating words:
“God help me . . . please help me. Salvo Di Di Salvo Die S Salvo.”
It is surmised he heard the name while under hypnotism.
Was Robert Kennedy a friend of Israel?
If Sirhan was, like Oswald, a patsy, only of a more sophisticated type (the Manchurian candidate type), the next question is:
Who had interest in having people believe that Robert was killed by a fanatic Palestinian motivated by the hatred of Israel?
To raise the question is to answer it. But then, we are faced with a dilemma, for if Robert Kennedy was supportive of Israel, why would the Israeli government kill him? The dilemma is an illusion, it rests on a misleading assumption which is part of the whole deception:
...in reality, Robert Kennedy was not pro-Israel. Simply, he was campaigning. As everyone knows, a few good wishes and promises to Israel are an inescapable ritual in such circumstances. And Robert’s statement in an Oregon synagogue, mentioned in the May 27 Pasadena Independent Star-News article found in Sirhan’s pocket, didn’t exceed the minimal requirements. Its author David Lawrence had, in an earlier article entitled “Paradoxical Bob”, underlined how little credit should be given to such electoral promises:
“Presidential candidates are out to get votes and some of them do not realize their own inconsistencies.”
In his brother’s government, Robert Kennedy had not been a particularly pro-Israel Attorney General:
...he had infuriated Zionist leaders by supporting an investigation led by senator William Fulbright of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, aimed at registering the American Zionist Council as a;
...subject to the obligations defined by the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, which would had considerably hindered its efficiency (after 1963, the AZD escaped this procedure by changing its status and renaming itself AIPAC).
All things considered, there is no ground for believing that Robert Kennedy would have been, as president of the U.S., particularly Israel-friendly.
His brother certainly had not been. The Kennedy family, proudly Irish and Catholic, was known for its hostility to Jewish influence in politics and in the press. During John’s presidential campaign, the Israeli party Herut had wondered publicly if the father, Joe Kennedy;
"did not inject some poisonous drops of anti-Semitism in the minds of his children.”
Did Robert intend to reopen the investigation on his brother’s assassination?
But let us assume, for the sake of argument, that Robert Kennedy was perceived as pro-Israel in 1968. All the same, Israel would have had a compelling motive to eliminate him, for the simple reason that Robert was, above all else, his brother’s heir and avenger. All of RFK’s biographers have stressed his devotion to his brother John. In return, John had come to trust his judgment on almost every issue, and had made him, not only his Attorney General, but also his closest adviser. Robert didn’t have John’s charisma, or his ambition. But he knew that he was, in the eyes of millions of Americans, the legitimate heir to the murdered king — as well as his avenger, even if the thought was rarely voiced. His public appearances led to displays of fervor never seen before for a presidential candidate, and his total lack of concern for his own safety made him look all the more genuine.
Was there, in 1968, any reason to believe that Robert intended to reopen the investigation on his brother’s death, once in the White House?
The answer is unambiguously, yes. A few days after the Dallas tragedy, Robert asked CIA director John McCone, a Kennedy friend, to find out if the plot had anything to do with the Agency. In March 1964, he had a face-to-face conversation with mobster Jimmy Hoffa, his sworn enemy, whom he had battled for ten years, and whom he suspected of having taken revenge on his brother. Robert also asked his friend Daniel Moynihan to search for any complicity in the Secret Service, who had been responsible for the President’s security in Dallas. And of course, Robert suspected Johnson, whom he had always despised and mistrusted.
A week only after JFK’s death, November 29, Bill Walton, a friend of the Kennedies, went to Moscow and handed to trusted agent Georgi Bolshakov a message for Khrushchev from Robert and Jacqueline Kennedy; according to the memo found in the Soviet archives in the 90s by Alexandr Fursenko and Timothy Naftali (One Hell of a Gamble, 1998), they wanted to inform the Soviet Premier that they believed John Kennedy had been:
“the victim of a right-wing conspiracy,” “that only RFK could implement John Kennedy’s vision, and that the cooling that might occur in U.S.-Soviet relations because of Johnson would not last forever.”
After the publication of the Warren Commission report, Bobby contacted a MI6 officer friend of the Kennedy family (dating back to the days when Joe Kennedy was the US Ambassador to England), who made arrangement for two French intelligence operatives to conduct, over a three year period, a quiet investigation that involved hundreds of interviews in the United States.
One of them was André Ducret, head of the security for French President Charles De Gaulle. Over the years, these French secret agents hired men to infiltrate the Texas oil industry, the CIA, and Cuban mercenary groups in Florida.
Their report, replete with innuendo about Lyndon Johnson and right-wing Texas oil barons, was delivered to Bobby Kennedy only months before his own assassination in June of 1968.
After Bobby’s death, the last surviving brother, Senator Ted Kennedy, showed no interest in the material.
The agents then hired a French writer by the name of Hervé Lamarr to fashion the material into a book, under the pseudonym of James Hepburn.
The book was first published in French under the title L’Amériquebrûle, and translated in 11 languages. No major US publisher was willing to print it, but it nevertheless circulated under the title Farewell America: The Plot to Kill JFK.
"President Kennedy’s assassination was the work of magicians. It was a stage trick, complete with accessories and fake mirrors, and when the curtain fell, the actors, and even the scenery disappeared.”
Robert Kennedy had planned to run for the American Presidency in 1972. One factor which pushed him to run in 1968 was the investigation by the New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison.
Garrison was privileged to see Abraham Zapruder’s amateur film, confiscated by the FBI on the day of the assassination, which show that the fatal shot came from the grassy knoll well in front of the President, not the School Book Depository located behind, where Oswald was supposed to have fired.
Robert Kennedy confided to his friend William Attwood, then editor of Look magazine, that he, like Garrison, suspected a conspiracy, “but I can’t do anything until we get control of the White House.”
Garrison claims that Robert sent him a message through a mutual friend: “Keep up the good work. I support you and when I’m president I am going to blow the whole thing wide open.”
Who killed John Kennedy?
The next question is: what might an unbiased federal investigation have revealed, under the supervision of RFK, known for his passionate commitment to truth and justice?
By a strange paradox, those who do not believe in Oswald’s guilt nevertheless try to find the culprit by scrutinizing Oswald’s weird biography.
It is like trying to solve 9/11 by studying Osama bin Laden’s life.
The obvious track to follow is rather that of the man who silenced Oswald, thus making sure he would not repeat in a court hearing what he had managed to tell journalists in a Police station corridor:
“I’m just a patsy!”
Oswald’s murderer is Jacob Leon Rubenstein: he is the only real murderer caught in relation to the Dallas assassination plot. Yet his trail seems to be “the road less traveled.”
Hardly anybody has ever heard his full name, for he is simply called Jack Ruby — which sounds conveniently Italian for a “mobster,” as he is sometimes depicted. And who has ever read that Ruby confessed separately to his rabbi (Hillel Silverman) and to his lawyer (William Kunstler):
“I did it for the Jews”?
Jack Ruby was intimately connected to the Jewish mafia — the Mishpucka (“Family” in Hebrew), also known as the “Yiddish Connection”.
As Gail Raven, a former girlfriend of Ruby and nightclub dancer in his Carousel Club, once said:
“He had no choice. […] Jack had bosses, just like everyone else.”
Jack Ruby’s boss and mentor was Hollywood mobster Mickey Cohen, successor to Benjamin “Bugsy” Siegelbaum, head of Murder Incorporated.
Cohen became infatuated with the Zionist cause after World War II, as he explained in his memoirs:
“Now I got so engrossed with Israel that I actually pushed aside a lot of my activities and done nothing but what was involved with this Irgun war”; what kept him so busy was mostly stealing WWII American surplus weapons for Israel.
Mickey Cohen “spent a lot of time” with Menahem Begin, the former Irgun chief, according to Gary Wean, former detective sergeant for the Los Angeles Police Department.
^ ^ ^ Jacob Rubenstein shoots the patsy Oswald, in the Dallas Police Station.
Beginning with Jack Ruby, the whole cover-up was run by ardent Zionists.
There is Arlen Specter, a key member of the Warren Commission and the inventor of the;
"magic bullet” theory;
...who would be mourned after his death as;
“an unswerving defender of the Jewish State”.
There is also James Jesus Angleton, who managed the cover-up as chief of Counterintelligence in the CIA, and who, according to his biographer Tom Mangold,
“was held in immense esteem by his Israeli colleagues and by the state of Israel, which was to award him profound honors after his death”.
I mention them in my book and in earlier articles, built upon the pioneer work of the now deceased Michael Collins Piper.
The ambush of JFK in Dallas itself was also run by Zionists.
Being officially “non political,” JFK’s trip was sponsored by a powerful business group known as the Citizens Council; Kennedy was on his way to their conference when he was shot.
The Citizens Council was dominated by Julius Schepps,
“member of every synagogue in town, and de facto leader of the Jewish community”, according to Bryan Stone.
Among other influential figures was advertising executive and PR man Sam Bloom, who chaired the “host committee” inviting Kennedy.
According to former British Intelligence Officer Colonel John Hughes-Wilson, It was Bloom who,
“suggested that the Police make Oswald accessible to the press. He also suggested — against the explicit advice of the local FBI — that they move the alleged assassin from the Dallas police station to the Dallas County Jail in order to give the newsmen a good story and pictures. Dallas FBI agent James Hosty always believed that Bloom and Ruby were in cahoots; when the police later searched Ruby’s home, they found a slip of paper with Bloom’s name, address and telephone number on it.”
So there is enough evidence that both the JFK assassination and the cover-up were schemed by what James Petras calls the Zionist Power Configuration, which includes an underground terror network affiliated to Murder Inc., in conspiracy with Lyndon Johnson, who had an obvious personal motive.
Why would Israel want to kill Kennedy?
One likely motive has been revealed by two books:
Seymour Hersh’sThe Samson Option in 1991, then Avner Cohen’s Israel and the Bomb in 1998.
A reviewer of Cohen’s book wrote in the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz:
“The book implied that, had Kennedy remained alive, it is doubtful whether Israel would today have a nuclear option.”
The recent edition by Martin Sandler of The Letters of John F. Kennedy has confirmed what these books had already proven: that Kennedy was fiercely determined to force Israel to abandon its nuclear weapon program. In his last letter to Ben-Gurion, dated June 15, 1963, Kennedy demanded an immediate inspection of Dimona followed by regular visits every six months; otherwise;
“this Government’s commitment to and support of Israel could be seriously jeopardized.”
The immediate result was that Ben-Gurion resigned on June 16 and dived into deep water.
Five months later, Kennedy’s death relieved Israel of all pressure. As Stephen Green tells it,
“Lyndon Johnson’s White House saw no Dimona, heard no Dimona, and spoke no Dimona when the reactor went critical in early 1964.”
In my view, Kennedy’s determination to abort the Dimona project was only part of the Kennedy problem, for Israel.
Just as importantly, Kennedy was supportive of Abdul Gamal Nasser and of the Palestinian cause. Historian Philip Muehlenbeck writes:
“While the Eisenhower administration had sought to isolate Nasser and reduce his influence through building up Saudi Arabia’s King Saud as a conservative rival to the Egyptian president, the Kennedy administration pursued the exact opposite strategy.”
Kennedy was also committed to the right of return for the nearly 800,000 Palestinian refugees expelled in 1947-48.
As late as November 20, 1963, the US delegation to the United Nations was calling again for Israel to implement Resolution 194, which triggered an outrage in Israeli circles.
^ ^ ^ Kennedy and Ben-Gurion
The serial assassinations of the Kennedys
As Lance deHaven-Smith has remarked in Conspiracy Theory in America,
“It is seldom considered that the Kennedy assassinations might have been serial murders. In fact, in speaking about the murders, Americans rarely use the plural, ‘Kennedy assassinations’. […] Clearly, this quirk in the Kennedy assassination(s) lexicon reflects an unconscious effort by journalists, politicians, and millions of ordinary Americans to avoid thinking about the two assassinations together, despite the fact that the victims are connected in countless ways.”
When John’s death is discussed, Robert’s death is not mentioned, and when Robert’s death is the issue, John’s death is only alluded to. But John and Robert should be considered as two brothers united by an unshakable love and loyalty, and not as separate individuals victims of unrelated murders — or of some kind of mysterious curse. What is the probability that these two murders are unrelated?
Both murders have at least two things in common:
Johnson and Israel. First, consider the fact that they precisely frame the presidency of Lyndon Johnson, who controlled both investigations:
Johnson became president the day of John’s death, and he retired a few months after Robert’s death. As for Israel’s fingerprints, there are quite obvious, and one must wonder why most investigators make so much effort not to see them: we have a Jewish gangster with Irgun connections, considered a terrorist organization silencing the patsy Oswald in the JFK case, and a young Palestinian hypnotized into an anti-Israeli terrorist in the RFK case.
These two pieces of the jigsaw puzzle, once connected, reveal rather clearly the profile of the instigators of both murders.
That is why the complicit corporate media keep them as disconnected as possible.
Ben-Gurion and Johnson had John Kennedy killed to save Dimona—and the Samson Option, the pillar of Israel’s foreign policy— and they killed Robert Kennedy because, as president, he would have “blown the whole thing wide open.”
As a distraction from the obvious “conspiracy theory” that any informed person would naturally form, a “malediction theory” is occasionally put forward: the Kennedy dynasty is cursed.
What ancestral sin may have provoked divine vengeance?
Washington Post journalist Ronald Kessler points to the anti-Semitism of the father, Joe Kennedy, and his politics of apeasment toward Hitler when he was US ambassador in London.
The title of his book, The Sins of the Father: Joseph P. Kennedy and the Dynasty He Founded (1996), is a subtle reference to Exodus 20:5:
“I, Yahweh your God, am a jealous God and I punish a parent’s fault in the children, the grandchildren, and the great-grandchildren among those who hate me.”
Kessler’s biblical phrase became prophetic when, three years later, John Fitzgerald Kennedy Junior also died in mysterious circonstances, with his wife and unborn child: following the trail of his father, he was just about to enter politics after a brief carreer in journalism, which had led him to be interested in conspiracy theories regarding Israel and political assassination.
^ ^ ^ John F. Kennedy Jr. and his wife Carolyn Bessette
On the Synthetic Nature of Arab Terrorism
In 2008, on the occasion of the 40th anniversary of Bobby’s assassination, this tragic day was installed into the post-9/11 mythology of the Clash of Civilization and the War on Terror.
On June 5th, 2008, The Jewish Daily Forward wrote:
“One cannot help but note the parallel between Kennedy’s assassination and the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. In both tragic cases, Arab fanaticism reared its ugly head on American soil, irrevocably changing the course of events in this country.”
“Robert Kennedy was the first American victim of modern Arab terrorism.”
“Sirhan hated Kennedy because he had supported Israel.”
“In remembering Bobby Kennedy, let us remember not just what he lived for, but also what he died for — namely, the precious nature of the American-Israeli relationship.”
Writing for the Boston Globe on the same anniversary date, Sasha Issenberg recalled that the death of Robert Kennedy was,
“a first taste of Mideast terror.”
He quotes Harvard professor and Zionist, Alan Dershowitz, a former volunteer in Robert Kennedy’s campaign (better known as Jonathan Pollard’s lawyer; and now Trump's lawyer, who also proclaimed that the age of consent should be lowered to 14 in 1997), reflecting:
“I thought of it as an act of violence motivated by hatred of Israel and of anybody who supported Israel,”
“It was in some ways the beginning of Islamic terrorism in America. It was the first shot. A lot of us didn’t recognize it at the time.”
The fact that Sirhan was from a Christian family was lost on Dershowitz, when he mentions “Islamic terrorism”.
But the Jewish Forward took care to mention it, only to add that Islam ran in his veins anyway:
“But what he shared with his Muslim cousins — the perpetrators of September 11 — was a visceral, irrational hatred of Israel. It drove him to murder a man whom some still believe might have been the greatest hope of an earlier generation.”
For the Jewish Forward, the point was to tell the Jews:
“See, it’s always the same eternal hatred of Jews and Israel.”
For the Boston Globe, the point was to tell Americans:
“We are all Israelis.”
(The Boston Globe is owned by the New York Times, controlled by the Sulzberger family, although Dershowitz would dismiss such remark as “nonsense”, as he did in his 2010 article, “Do Jews Control the Media?”).
No doubt such statements, and worse ones, will be repeated on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of RFK’s death in June 2018.
Or perhaps not; for as more and more people are becoming aware that the official story cannot be trusted, Sirhan’s alleged anti-Israeli motivation will inevitably raise suspicion of an Israeli-made false flag. Moreover, by examining closely what kind of pioneering anti-Zionist terrorist Sirhan Sirhan was, people may start to learn something about the synthetic nature of this post-modern terrorism that infects our world and our mind since September 11th, 2001.
Jerry Cohen, “Yorty Reveals That Suspect’s Memo Set Deadline for Death,”Los Angeles Times, June 6, 1968, pages 1 and 12, on latimesblogs.latimes.com/thedailymirror/2008/06/june-6-1968.html. Jerry Cohen, “Jerusalem-Born Suspect Called An Anti-Semite,” The Salt Lake Tribune, June 6, 1968, on www.newspapers.com/newspage/11976683/ and www.newspapers.com/newspage/10399250/ See also Harry Rosenthal, “Senator Kennedy’s support for Israel promoted decision declares Sirhan,” The Telegraph, March 5, 1969, on news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2209&dat=19690305&id=QpgrAAAAIBAJ&sjid=mfUFAAAAIBAJ&pg=7109,318608&hl=fr
Frank Morales, “The Assassination of RFK: A Time for Justice!”, June 16, 2012, on www.globalresearch.ca;watch on YouTube, “RFK Assassination 40th Anniversary (2008) Paul Schrade on CNN.”
Philip Melanson, The Robert F. Kennedy Assassination: New Revelations On the Conspiracy And Cover-Up, S.P.I. Books, 1994, p. 25. For a full overview, watch Shane O’Sullivan’s 2007 investigative documentary RFK Must Die: The Assassination of Bobby Kennedy. For more detail, read his book Who Killed Bobby? The Unsolved Murder of Robert F. Kennedy, Union Square Press, 2008.See also Don Schulman’s testimony in The Second Gun (1973), from 42 min 40.
 Frank Morales, “The Assassination of RFK: A Time for Justice!”, June 16, 2012, on www.globalresearch.ca
 Listen to Sirhan pleading for parole in 2011 on YouTube, « Sirhan Sirhan Denied Parole ».
Shane O’Sullivan, Who Killed Bobby? The Unsolved Murder of Robert F. Kennedy, Union Square Press, 2008, p. 5, 44, 103.
Jacqui Goddard, “Sirhan Sirhan, assassin of Robert F.Kennedy, launches new campaign for freedom 42 years later,”The Telegraph, December 3, 2011, on www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/8933592/Sirhan-Sirhan-assassin-of-Robert-F.Kennedy-launches-new-campaign-for-freedom-42-years-later.html
William Turner and John Christian, The Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy: The Conspiracy and Cover-up (1978), Basic Books, 2006, p. 225-229.
The Israel Lobby Archive, www.irmep.org/ila/forrel/
Alan Hart, Zionism, The Real Ennemies of the Jews, vol. 2:David Becomes Goliath, Clarity Press, 2013,p. 252.
PBS American Experience & The Kennedys part 2, sur YouTube.
David Talbot, Brothers: The Hidden History of the Kennedy Years, Simon & Schuster, 2007, p. 25-27.
Gus Russo, Live by the Sword: The Secret War Against Castro and the Death of JFK,Bancroft Press, 1998, p. 574-575.
James Hepburn, L’Amériquebrûle, NouvellesFrontières, 1968 ;Farewell America: The Plot to Kill JFK, Penmarin Books, 2002, p. 269.
David Talbot, Brothers, op. cit.,p. 312-314.
 Garrison quoted in David Talbot, Brothers, op. cit.,p. 333.
William Kunstler, My Life as a Radical Lawyer, Carol Publishing, 1994, p. 158 ; Steve North, “Lee Harvey Oswald’s Killer ‘Jack Ruby’ Came From Strong Jewish Background,” The Forward, November 17, 2013,sur forward.com
Mickey Cohen, In My Own Words, Prentice-Hall, 1975, p. 91-92.
Brad Lewis, Hollywood’s Celebrity Gangster: The Incredible Life and Time of Mickey Cohen, Amazon, 2009, p. 56, 265-266, 287.
 Natasha Mozgovaya, “Prominent Jewish-American politician Arlan Specter dies at 82”, Haaretz, October 14, 2012, on www.haaretz.com.
Tom Mangold, Cold Warrior: James Jesus Angleton: the CIA’s Master Spy Hunter, Simon & Schuster, 1991.
Bryan Edward Stone, The Chosen Folks: Jews on the Frontiers of Texas, University of Texas Press, 2010, p. 200. Wealthy Jews were highly influential in Texas, as Natalie Ornish has also shown in Pioneer Jewish Texans, The Texas A&M University Press, 2011.
John Hughes-Wilson, JFK-An American Coup d’État: The Truth Behind the Kennedy Assassination, John Blake, 2014.
Michael Collins Piper, False Flag : Template for Terror, American Free Press, 2013, p. 54-55.
Warren Bass, Support any Friend: Kennedy’s Middle East and the Making of the U.S.-Israel Alliance, 2003, p. 219. The Letters of John F. Kennedy, edited by Martin W. Sandler, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2013.
 Stephen Green, Taking Sides: America’s Secret Relations With a Militant Israel, William Morrow & Co., 1984, p. 166.
Philip Muehlenbeck, Betting on the Africans: John F. Kennedy’s Courting of African Nationalist Leaders, Oxford UP, 2012, p. xi, 122-4.
Michael Collins Piper, Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy, American Free Press, 6thed., ebook 2005, p. 115.
 Lance deHaven-Smith, Conspiracy Theory in America, op. cit., k. 284-292.
Ronald Kessler, The Sins of the Father: Joseph P. Kennedy and the Dynasty He Founded, Hodder& Stoughton, 1996.
Barry Chamish believes that John John was victim of an Israeli plot: “The Murder of JFK Jr – Ten Years Later,”sur www.rense.com/general87/tenyrs.htm
Jeffrey Salkin, “Remember What Bobby Kennedy Died For,” Forward.com, June 5, 2008. Also Michael Fischbach, “First Shot in Terror War Killed RFK,” Los Angeles Times, June 02, 2003, on articles.latimes.com
Sasha Issenberg, “Slaying gave US a first taste of Mideast terror,”Boston Globe, 5 juin2008, on www.boston.com
Alan Dershowitz, “Do Jews Control the Media?”, huffingtonpost.com, October 6, 2010.