you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

i'm not sure what your argument is?

i provided clear evidence linking Rh- to limited/single mutation & on going breeding/death to produce genetically diverse populations, rh+ and rh-

you seem to be having another discussion based on some kind of race bait.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

My argument is that the rheses genetic factor may be real, but it's seemingly trivial in it's impact.

So trivial that its only impact that I'm aware of is an argument for race seperations.

If we want to have divisive race discussions then let's discuss some concrete and statistically significant factor.

The largest distinguishing genetic factor actually works against your position of white elitism.

So, either take a position of biological objectivity and recognize Africans as more biologically human than the rest (and better at sports), or accept that the differences are skin deep and that were all equals.

That seems like a reasonable conclusion; given the biological evidence.

My position is that we are all equals, and the idea of race is foolish.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

it is far from trivial. It leads to death when Rh+ and Rh- interbreed.

The very core of speciation - nonviable offspring.

We've overcome the issue with technology, but before that it was a huge problem.

You are the one who has got so hung up on other arguments that you've lost sight of the science.

your position of white elitism

Excuse me, but go fuck yourself. I've never said anything remotely like that.

My position is that we are all equals, and the idea of race is foolish.

I get that. It is quite clear. It is an emotional position, but whatever. genetics are real.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

your position of white elitism

Excuse me, but go fuck yourself. I've never said anything remotely like that.

It was my impression that your rheses position was in defense of the posted subject matter.

Is Diversity Destroying the Unique Souls of Whites?

Can this statement be understood as something other than white elitism?

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

you asked for an example of speciation, so I gave you one. You've then projected a ton of shit onto me, and onto the subject, whilst being dishonest about it.

we are all unique. All different, all unique. Eliteism is what you've brought. Take your prejudice elsewhere

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

That's a fair criticism.

I apologise for projecting assumptions onto you.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

thanks. I understand that these things can become convoluted.

big MSM news today. "we should prepare for bioweapons targeted at ethnic groups".

An ethnic groups is a cohort that has become self-similar due to selective genetic exchange.

Otherwies known as race. You can play semantics and re-define race to become meaningless, but genes are real, and the difference between me and a potato is a few billion years and a tiny bit of selective breeding. The liberal argument against race is based on emotions and perceived and projected ideas of superiority/inferiority. The scientific argument for it is just genetic.

As we admix due to forced multiculturalism (which has a minor mixing effect, races still seem to, on the whole, prefer their own, especially if you look at non-western nations), then the scientific argument for the re-mixing of race grows. at no point does the historic existence of races that can be remixed disappear.

Race is real. Prejudice is another matter. We can have genetically identifiable markers for race and genetically measurable mean differences between markers for race (which exist in all areas of the genome) without needing to be arseholes to each other because of it.

There are beautiful people everywhere, and cunts everywhere too. There seems to be a common distribution of these people in every race (using the old fashioned definition) or in every ethnic group (using the PC term).

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

All humans come from a base populating pool of about 10k people 70k years ago. Relative to other mammals humans have trivial diversity.

There's no way they've worked out gene targeting bioweapons. We barely understand the mechanisms on our genes, or the interactions of our immune system.

Couple this with the wild success of modern sanitation, and this is a Boogey man idea that just isn't happening.

IMHO.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's totally unfounded, Tom. There is 0 evidence that we all come from a pool of 10k people 70k years ago. Indeed, we see divergent genetics going back 100k years in saliva glands.

There's no way they've worked out gene targeting bioweapons.

don't be daft. We know a lot about ethnic distributions of various metabolic proteins. We know a lot about ethnic distributions of proteins of all types.

We could, today, target sub saharan africans via the previously mentioned saliva genetics, which are unique to a cross-breeding between humans and a now extinct different branch of great apes 100k years ago.

If you are prepared to debate scientifically, and not get into semantics, emotion and ethics, then I can bring you paper after paper showing ethnic distribution difference in a number of important markers, all of which can be used for bioweapon targetting.

Its a bit harder to pick off very mullato races, like europeans, say, as the muttness shares a lot of genetics with everywhere, but you could certainly hit the very whitest from divergent evolution 30 to 40k years ago.

By the way, were you aware that there was an out of control pandemic growing, spread by a genetically altered virus that has an outsized effect on Chinese males? 5 day outside of body survival, up to 14 days of asymptomatic spread, infection via breath, touch and eyes...

If you look at the latest images out of china, the authorities are now fully goggled up. masks are not enough.