Is Diversity Destroying the Unique Souls of Whites?

submitted by FullBloodedWhiteMale from eurocanadian.ca

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

No.

I'm pretty sure that all souls are colorless.

These souls reside in various people.

Some of these people look white, because of a difference in pigment. It's only skin deep.

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

joking aside, skin is an expression of DNA, the fractal explosion of the original cellular load in a fertilized egg. The differences between us are deep, digging down through millenia, although race mixing both brings us closer, and destroys lots of the pretty things that separate lines of evolution can build. Including art, music, religion, law, cities, civilisation etc.

We are more different from each other than species of birds are from each other.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

Evidence?

There's are no genetic complications from any two opposite genders having children (unless they are related).

Infact, genetic diversity is biologically advantageous. Reducing recessive gene interactions.

AFAIK birds cannot mix species. No turkey ducks, or peacock ostriches.

Thomas Jefferson, on the other hand...

Also, this post is here to troll and repel Redditors that may want to find a new community.

Voat goats dgaf about this stuff.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

There's are no genetic complications from any two opposite genders having children (unless they are related).

look up rhesus negative

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Rhesus negative blood isn't the result of diversity breeding. It can occur even if both parents are from the same ethnic community.

I would hope that there is better evidence than this for the white separation case.

If this is it then the "whiteness" position is created on a bedrock of wet sand.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

nonsense, tom. Rhesus negative is a distinct breeding trait. Its been mixed back in again 10,000 years ago, but rhesus negative and positive crossbreeding killed a lot of babies/mothers until last century.

Maybe go read some non-woke sources to get genetic reality on that one.

and You are the one who brought 'whiteness' into it, I merely gave an example of speciation between humans. That we now have a technological solution for the cross-species issues doesn't stop them being there.

Seems to me you are bringing some pre-conceived 'white' / 'non-white' prejudice into it.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Source?

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1706434/pdf/ajhg00380-0068.pdf

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/PL00006583

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04199.x

etc

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1706434/pdf/ajhg00380-0068.pdf

You'll have to forgive me for being skeptical of a 55 year old genetics study.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/PL00006583

Evolution of Rh Blood Group Genes Have Experienced Gene Conversions and Positive Selection

This paper compares the Rh group among primates.
Are you making an africans are similar to monkeys comparison? Because chimpanzees often have male patterned baldness. Are bald men more similar to chimpanzees than men with hair?

Conversely non-Africans have Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA. There's an argument that can be made that Africans are the most human of all of us.

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/01/more-neanderthal-dna-than-you-think/

The genetic fingerprints of this mixing remain apparent in many populations today. Roughly two percent of the genomes of Europeans and Asians are Neanderthal. Asians also carry additional Denisovan DNA, up to 6 percent in Melanesians. But African populations seemed to have largely been left out of this genetic shakeup.

I wonder how the Africans feel about having their kin's blood contaminated with the primitive Neanderthal and Denisovan blood.

The genetic facts appear undermine the white blood theory, cause it turns out that the Africans are actually the pure bloods.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04199.x

I don't think it's appropriate to continue to slander the pure-blood africans.

etc.

Conclusion: DNA evidence strongly suggests that the only true pure blood whites are African Albinos.

Everyone else is a Denisovan or Neanderthal muggle mudblood.

Hopefully we can learn from our ancestors, because sex with other species/races seems to have worked out fairly well. You're probably missing out... ;-)

It's all good cause Harry Potter was half-muggle. The white blood idea is a similar fantasy.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

i'm not sure what your argument is?

i provided clear evidence linking Rh- to limited/single mutation & on going breeding/death to produce genetically diverse populations, rh+ and rh-

you seem to be having another discussion based on some kind of race bait.