all 34 comments

[–]Tom_Bombadil 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (31 children)

No.

I'm pretty sure that all souls are colorless.

These souls reside in various people.

Some of these people look white, because of a difference in pigment. It's only skin deep.

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

souls are far from colorless. I've eaten many, and they are all different. About 360 different main flavours.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There were a couple of a soul recalls. You may have received tainted batches. ;-)

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I like chocolate with a splash of peppermint. Gimmesum.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sure. come over. said the spider to the fly

[–]Penelope 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Are racial behavioral differences only skin deep?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Socioeconomic deep.

Are white people predisposed to heroin addictions?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Remember that the Europeans have only been advanced for about 600 years. They finally caught up; mostly due to their Savage plunder of the rest of the more civilized world.

Before that they were in the dark ages; all the way back to prehistory.

It's worth remembering that Darwin's English cliche categorized the Irish at the very bottom of the human species list.

"Whiteness" is a modern invention.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

does this mean we go back into dark ages if we let other races plunder and conquer us

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

The US does plenty of plundering. Has any other country gone back to the dark ages?

I suppose the native american extermination would suggest it's possible.

Centers of empire generally last for centuries. Cairo. Rome. London. Baghdad. The US wrecked the latter for israel, but it's still standing and it will eventually recover.

Also, there really isn't a credible physical threat to the US. Nukes, but that's a suicidal pact. Assuming that they work as described.

I've seen mushroom clouds from thermobaric bombs, as well. Look back at Hiroshima photos. There isn't an obvious destruction epicenter as you would expect. Instead, there's evidence of a massive fire that tourched everthing; except for the brick/stone structures. The japanese had wooden buildings with paper walls (literally), which is difficult to imagine. Given all of the psyops of recent times it's not difficult to imagine that this was a psyop to start a fictitious cold war experiment.

Anyway, I think the answer is no. If anything, the US will canabalize itself as a result of infiltration, and self-sabotage. Not back to the stone age.

The way back to the stone age is still present, but it would be a solar induced dark age..
There's no preventing that.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

US will canabalize itself as a result of infiltration, and self-sabotage

I think this is what this post is worried about

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

This is true. Unfortunately, it's looking in the wrong place. It's bogus disinfo.

The sabotage comes from the american Zionists (christian and jewish both). They are working with the British Zionists and Israeli Zionists. Internal and external.

All of these of these Zionist groups are "white". The Jewish community claims that they are not white. Regardless, they are eastern European, and they are white.
This is the equivalent of the English claiming that the Welsh are a different race. It's absurd.

US will cannibalize itself as a result of infiltration, and self-sabotage

In this context, the white souls plan to cannibalize the other white souls; and attempt to shift the blame to other ethnic groups. Half-truths are excellent disinfo.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's tough, criticizing zionists is taboo. In this OP's link it seems careful not to do so. Seems to criticize cultural marxism as a placeholder. An example of a paragraph where there are some similarities:

"So much had been lost, was being lost. The next, the last, generation of whites would be deprived of all that nourished their souls. Their parents had already been vulgarized by the Enemy, fed a steady diet of Friends, Seinfeld and Sex and the City. Already they had eschewed, surrendered, large chunks of their heritage. The schools no longer had Christmas pageants and no longer sang Christmas carols, and public squares were not allowed to show Nativity scenes. Because they had, after centuries of custom, become part of the white cultural heritage and tradition, and were therefore — for now — a part of its felt identity. The regime pretended that it would “offend people of other religions.” Students were obligated to read not Milton or D. H. Lawrence but the mediocre literary output of alien authors such as Elie Wiesel, and of aliens who obviously nourished a vicious hatred for white people: Gloria Anzaldua, Jamaica Kincaid and Toni Morrison. For poetry, instead of the haunting beauty of “The Highwayman” our young are compelled to read “Howl” by the foul Allen Ginsberg."

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The FBI crime statistics tend to imply that blacks are many times more likely to commit a felony than any other race. But, you already knew that, you rascal.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You aren't a geneticist and correlation does not imply causation. So the only thing I see is one dumb-ass standing on one side of the political spectrum hoping the dark world in their mind is the light!

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

joking aside, skin is an expression of DNA, the fractal explosion of the original cellular load in a fertilized egg. The differences between us are deep, digging down through millenia, although race mixing both brings us closer, and destroys lots of the pretty things that separate lines of evolution can build. Including art, music, religion, law, cities, civilisation etc.

We are more different from each other than species of birds are from each other.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

Evidence?

There's are no genetic complications from any two opposite genders having children (unless they are related).

Infact, genetic diversity is biologically advantageous. Reducing recessive gene interactions.

AFAIK birds cannot mix species. No turkey ducks, or peacock ostriches.

Thomas Jefferson, on the other hand...

Also, this post is here to troll and repel Redditors that may want to find a new community.

Voat goats dgaf about this stuff.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

There's are no genetic complications from any two opposite genders having children (unless they are related).

look up rhesus negative

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Rhesus negative blood isn't the result of diversity breeding. It can occur even if both parents are from the same ethnic community.

I would hope that there is better evidence than this for the white separation case.

If this is it then the "whiteness" position is created on a bedrock of wet sand.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

nonsense, tom. Rhesus negative is a distinct breeding trait. Its been mixed back in again 10,000 years ago, but rhesus negative and positive crossbreeding killed a lot of babies/mothers until last century.

Maybe go read some non-woke sources to get genetic reality on that one.

and You are the one who brought 'whiteness' into it, I merely gave an example of speciation between humans. That we now have a technological solution for the cross-species issues doesn't stop them being there.

Seems to me you are bringing some pre-conceived 'white' / 'non-white' prejudice into it.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Source?

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1706434/pdf/ajhg00380-0068.pdf

You'll have to forgive me for being skeptical of a 55 year old genetics study.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/PL00006583

Evolution of Rh Blood Group Genes Have Experienced Gene Conversions and Positive Selection

This paper compares the Rh group among primates.
Are you making an africans are similar to monkeys comparison? Because chimpanzees often have male patterned baldness. Are bald men more similar to chimpanzees than men with hair?

Conversely non-Africans have Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA. There's an argument that can be made that Africans are the most human of all of us.

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/01/more-neanderthal-dna-than-you-think/

The genetic fingerprints of this mixing remain apparent in many populations today. Roughly two percent of the genomes of Europeans and Asians are Neanderthal. Asians also carry additional Denisovan DNA, up to 6 percent in Melanesians. But African populations seemed to have largely been left out of this genetic shakeup.

I wonder how the Africans feel about having their kin's blood contaminated with the primitive Neanderthal and Denisovan blood.

The genetic facts appear undermine the white blood theory, cause it turns out that the Africans are actually the pure bloods.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04199.x

I don't think it's appropriate to continue to slander the pure-blood africans.

etc.

Conclusion: DNA evidence strongly suggests that the only true pure blood whites are African Albinos.

Everyone else is a Denisovan or Neanderthal muggle mudblood.

Hopefully we can learn from our ancestors, because sex with other species/races seems to have worked out fairly well. You're probably missing out... ;-)

It's all good cause Harry Potter was half-muggle. The white blood idea is a similar fantasy.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

i'm not sure what your argument is?

i provided clear evidence linking Rh- to limited/single mutation & on going breeding/death to produce genetically diverse populations, rh+ and rh-

you seem to be having another discussion based on some kind of race bait.

[–]fruitjack 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

oh lord is this site going to be all 100% white trash now?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hopefully not, but there is a whole network of these weirdos that have burned down other sites. Also, they are emboldened by the tyrants that seek universal domination.