/u/zyxzevn /u/AnarchySpeach /u/zyxzevn

Yuri Bezimenov, wasn't always right. Though we must not write him off, for his teachings concerning demoralization and ideological subversion are intriguing. His lectures, although insightful, were quite opinionated and staunchly in favor of the oligarch fad of a faux free market system, and that could simply be his disillusionment of the closed off Soviet system. The Oligarchs in Russia, mostly Russian Jews had pillaged the corporation of Russia after Soviet Russia supposedly collapsed but some said went underground. One system of commerce and government after another doesn't change the fact that some bad people want to centralize the economy the bureaucracies of a government and its systems for their own benefit and those of their friends, like the plutocractic, oligarchic corportocracy of the CORPORATION OF THE UNTIED STATES. We must remember, that the Tsars were no saints. The Rothschilds owned nearly all of the oil in imperialist White Russia and had a strong business relation with the Tsars. I find it hilarious how the alt-right and the so-called media termed neo-nazis of the far right put Puti non some sort of pedestal, like the UNZ REview does, which is owned by what the media terms a self-hating Jew.

Some say the Tsars and white Russians are back in power, which might be true considering the Chabad-Lubavitchers are markedly close to Putin. This cult is staunchly racist and Zionist and the Bolsheviks were not too fond of nationalism, espeically Zionism. The transcriptions of the World Jewish Congress during the Bolshevik years perfect illustrate this division.

During the Bolshevik revolution (foreign revolution) instigated by Lenin and Trotsky, both foreign born and 1/2 apostate Jew and full apostate Jew; they, with Jewish banker Jacob Schiff's money in hand, NOT THE ROTHSCHILDS, left for Russia to destabilze and destroy imperialist Russia. It should be stated that Zionists in Russia, although not mass slaughtered such as the Cossacks were disliked by the Bolsheviks. They found them to be cowards in wanting a homeland in Palestine, and wished for Jews in the Diaspora to assimilate.

So, these Chabad-Lubavitchers, who Trump, Kushner and Netanyahu are very close to and have giving millions of dollars in funds for their cause in business and religious related activities, are back in Russia and are staunchly theocratic.

As for Yuri, he reminds me of Alexander Solzhenitsyn, who was a rightful living and noble peace prize winner, a very religious Christian (not sure about Yuri) who suffered through the Soviet Gulag system. The former, Yuri, was a longtime agent of said system. His defection, was a noble move but he had not gone through the terrible conditions Solzhenitsyn did.

My question to saidit users: Why would Solzhenitsyn's book '200 Years Together' be banned in the US, whilst openly published in Russia? If Russia was communist today, they surely would want to ban such a book, but they do not do such a thing. Instead it is the US publishers that censors this book and the Russian government which prevents its transcribing into English.

Unlike Solzhenitsyn, Michael Wolff has never got a Nobel in literature, but he wrote a gossip book of Donald Trump, which made news all over the world. Trump wanted to stop the publication of the book, but the President of the USA does not have such powers. The President is not the most powerful man: there are those who can stop publication.

The reason for not publishing the book?

...American Jews have claimed that the book is anti-Semitic. I read the most criticized parts and I do not find is anti-Semitic. The book simply tells more or less correct history of certain events, which are not so flattering to Jews. Dark episodes, though maybe not so dark, can be found from the history of most peoples.

The publication of Michael Wolff’s book Fire and Fury: inside Trump’s White House had a different reception. It was not only in the daily news here in Finland, but I also saw it in the news of the satellite channel TV5monde. It must have been in the main news in many countries.

The revelations of Wolff’s book are maybe not quite as large as in Solzhenitsyn. Solzhenitsyn states that Bolshevik Jews were responsible of over 60 million dead Russians and he gives sources, which apparently were carefully checked by the Russian publisher, while Wolff’s main revelation is that Trump’s son and son-in-law met a Russian lawyer and discussed how to defame Hillary Clinton in the presidential elections. This is not disputed, but many other of Wolff’s claims come without a proof.

And we do know, as of today, Trump has many connections to Russian oligarchics, as did Clinton and Bush. On a side note, George H. W. Bush signed into law the Noahide laws, however, they'd only by enacted if martial law was imposed. Though, what's to say this was just a gimmick to appease the Chabad-Lubavitchers? We also have an old picture of Richard Spencer, the Jewish National Bolshevik, and falsely accused white nationalist by the mockingbird media with his Soviet born wife standing next to, yes, Laura Bush. These people might simply be playing roles to scare people more to the right, ie. to the Zionist cause, or it could be the opposite. Maybe they are true and tried Eurasianist Duginist National Bolsheviks and wish to subvert and demoralize and confuse the public in America to accepting Multilateralism.

200 years together demonstrates that the Russian Revolutions and the building of communism, including Cheka and Gulags, was largely run by Bolshevik Jews, especially in the early years. These facts have been known to anybody who has wanted to check their correctness already for some time. They were common knowledge before the Second World War, but after the war censorship of the winners did manage to suppress or cast the shadow of extreme rightist propaganda over much of correct information. It is very good that these facts have been rechecked by Solzhenitsyn, who was so appreciated as a truth teller in the West. There is a still ongoing effort to suppress these facts by silently forbidding the publication of Solzhenitsyn’s book in many countries, but there are web sites, which tell the story. More and more people will eventually know the facts and finally the official history must be revised.

Typically, if you mention that Jewish Bolsheviks were largely responsible for the terror in the early years of Soviet Union, and add that there is a good case for Israel being implicated in the 911 attack, and that one of the better theories why John F. Kennedy was assassinated was that he tried to sop Israel’s nuclear weapon program, and that in the First Worlds War Zionistic Jews turned the USA to the Allied side in order to get England promise them a Jewish home land in the Balfour declaration, people try to ridicule this by saying: so Jews are behind everything, what a powerful small nation, I don’t believe it. But this is a wrong reaction. It is precisely so, that today you cannot blame Jews for anything at all without being called an anti-Semite. It is fine to blame the Muslims for terrorism and treatment of women, it is fine to blame Germans for two world wars and the Holocaust, it is fine to blame the Whites or the Christians for black slave trade, destruction of the American Indians, selling opium to Chinese, and for everything else, it is even fine to mention that Sweden destroyed much of Germany and Poland by the live-off-the-land supply solution in the 17th century, though there were many Finns in the Swedish army, but criticizing Jews is not allowed, because that will lead to a new Holocaust. This is so, because the reasons and character of the Holocaust are not understood.

Jews are not behind everything bad that has happened in the world. They probably have a role in the Syrian civil war, but not in the Ukrainian or Yugoslavian wars. They were not behind the Irish or Bask terrorist, nor involved in the war between Georgia and Russia. Still, Jews, like other peoples, have been involved in certain events. Solzhenitsyn says in his book that Jewish Bolsheviks did not make the Russian revolutions, but they had an important role in the crimes of Bolsheviks. He is probably correct. Socialism started from the Enlightenment. In the beginning socialism was partially based on the ideas of some utopists with very Christian aspirations. But what happened was that the leftist ORIENT Freemasons tried to change the system by revolutions. Practically all of the revolutionary activity from the American war of independence in 1776 to the Paris Commune in 1871 was organized by subversive leftist Freemason lodges and Carbonaries, not to be confused with the benign Freemasonic lodges. After the Paris Commune fell, leftist revolutionary Freemasons were pardoned and largely disappeared from the scene. Subversive activity was taken over by communists, who were the direct descendants of Carbonaries and leftist Freemasons. Communists, who made the revolutions in Russia, were not only Jews, and ethnic identity was not important for Communists, yet the Jews were heavily overrepresented, especially in the leading positions of the Soviet system. According to Solzhenitsyn, in the early years after the Bolshevik revolution, in Russia Communism was identified in people’s minds with Jews, and this was not only in Russia.

Read his book, oh wait, you can't its banned. I believe it is in PDF form online, so duckduckgo it.