you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Aetherist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Dawson was a [severley] limited hangout at best.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Proof?

This video does not prove or disprove anything.

[–]Aetherist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

From his own words (in other vid) Dawson seems to believe that Arab terrorists were responsible for the destruction of the WTC. Imho controlled demolition is visually obvious.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Ya. He seems to think there were legit hijackers. I don't know if he considers drones.

Also he buys the Pentagon wreckage story. Personally, Barbara Honneger's theory makes WAAAAY more sense to me.

To be honest, he makes mountains out of molehills and says he doesn't want to talk about the physics and then goes on to talk about the physics. If he'd just shut up about some stuff already it'd be done.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He attacks the operation Northwoods and drone theorists.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anyone promoting the hijacking narrative is by definition a controlled opposition.