you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]hennaojisan 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Instead of making my thoughts an actual Post, I'll just summarize them here: I've been a casual observer of Pacific typhoons for many years. As we are nearing the end of the 2019 typhoon season, I have a completely anecdotal observation: The past three Pacific typhoons of this season have followed the same course. That is, they approach Japan near the Kyushu-Shikoku area but remain mostly out at sea. Then they turn directly toward Tokyo and in those last three cases they in fact did hit Tokyo. There is another small Typhoon coming into the Kyushu-Shikoku area right now and, yes, at least at present it is making a beeline for Tokyo. If this situation is "natural" it is one helluva coincidence, well a string of coincidences since typhoons rarely hit the Tokyo area anyway.

Even more speculation:

Next year Tokyo will host the Olympics with many visitors expected. The opening ceremony is smack dab in the middle of typhoon season.

Whether HAARP can be used to direct hurricanes and typhoons is controversial but I am becoming a believer (based on the above info and the paths of two recent hurricanes that hit Houston, Texas).

Which countries might have the motive and means to control these storms and is a massive storm going to hit the Tokyo area during next year's Olympics?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

+3

You should definitely post this as a standalone submission.

UK Critical Thinker had a video which pointed out the miraculous inverse. There's never inclement weather during any of the terror events that are accused of being false flags. Regardless of ones opinion of the cause of the event; the coincidentally favorable weather is far beyond suspicious.

IIRC /u/Jesus posted a comprehensive account of the Sandyhook weather. Maybe he could link to it in your post (because comprehensive is not an exaggeration for his comments/submissions. He does it legit. ;-).

Great observation bro! ;-)

[–]hennaojisan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Okie dokie bro, will do

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/862d0040863841368f54c6ef5c432d610329b824680dd62bcc9031f59d012f90.png


Go onto NASA's earth imagery via terraAqua imagery archives, you can pay for it in HD footage. Now go throughout each day before Sandy Hook and after. When you zoom in to Sandy Hook on the day of the event, they were spraying trails back and forth to cover Satellite imagery. And luckily, the entire school is covered and can not be seen in the early morning hours of the day, despite it being a clear, sunny day.

So, I searched daily flight patterns to see IF ANY of these planes were commerical jet liners or cargo planes, I then called various companies to try to pin point where these trials came from. Nothing, they were not commercial jets nor cargo planes. And NO, they are not chemtrails, which stands for chemical trails, though, in retrospect, regular contrials and their emissions are known to cause cancers in animal models, indeed, their are carcinogens in contrails.

What I am talking about is geoengineering aerosol spraying, in this case sulfur trails to hide something. Camoflauge spraying is very real and was patented by the military to hide land from Satellites, foreign or domestic.

These are NOT ice crystals and ARE NOT composed of h20. How do I know that? NASA has a app, which you have to pay for that illustrates these are not normal contrails and are not composed of ice crystals. They would appear redish/pink on the image app, but they do not. And I went throughout each day and picked the same humidity in the upper atmosphere and the height at which planes travel. Guess what, none of these trials. So, what is it then?

The air traffic wasn't even close to matching these patterns! Everyday, I monitored the air traffic over Sandy Hook, they never had traffic directly over Sandy Hook to account for these specific trails!

I checked the air speeds that day, in an effort to judge when the oldest trails were sprayed. As I continued to try to explain these trails, I was able to find the tracking data for the Terra Satellite. I was able to timestamp the imaage, which is 15:13 UTC time: 11:15 Eastern Time.

When I went through the Sandy Hook police dashcams I found in the early morning that the planes, that DO NOT SHOW UP on flight traffic data were already covering the sky with trails before the event took place.

And, I was able to discover that three planes at various heights two of which were at the same height as these phantom planes sprayed regular contrails, unlike these trails pictured here.

I've scanned every single day of imagery, from 2010-2016, 5,000 images. December 14th, 2012, is the ONLY DAY in Satellite imagery history where these trails appear. I think I did enough research to prove that these trails are not regular contrails.


Infrared Views of contrails is a good indicator of water content.

So, I know that these trails were sprayed 2-3 hours BEFORE the event started at 9:00am.

SWIR- Short Wave Infrared Satellite imaging, measures the light reflected and converts that light into color coordinated images.

white = Water Vapor

Pink = Ice Crystals

Red = Snow

Black = Standing water (Oceans, Lakes, etc.)

Green = Vegetation


When I zoomed into this specific image, 2 types of clouds are pictured, ice crystal clouds, near Boston and water vapor clouds, out in the Atlantic.

SWIR imaging show the ice crystals in pink very clearly and the water vapor is very defined. I ask you to try this out also!

Now, I found some contrails about 400 miles west of Sandy Hook, clearly visble ice crystals, but zero water vapor? There are clouds to the north, depicting water vapor, but we only see ice crystals in these contrails. So, these contrails have ice crystals, which is proven via SWIR.

When I went back to the sandy Hook trails, they do not match the other contrails. They have no visible water vapor, but they also have almost no visible ice particles apart from one smaller trail that appears to be from a real commercial airliner, unlike the others.

In conclusion, the US Govt, spent our money to create a smokescreen of sorts at around sunrise BEFORE the event, why?

To prevent all satellite imagery from seeing the alleged shooters route, any stops made, who came out of mom's house, how many people got out of the car with 4 doors open to allegedly kill kids. All of this was kept hidden by the US Govt. And most likely, the real reason, to cover-up the obvious setting up of this PSYOP.

The Governments of the world have HD resolution satellite imagery, that can see the face of a dime. I have proven, at least to my self that these are not common contrails from commercial or cargo jets.


Statistical analysis concluded the odds of 20 such elderly mothers is 62, 482, 742, 574, 637, 216, 553 to one (that’s 62 quintillion to one), and it is 812 million times more likely that the alleged victims were born in 1996 rather than 2006 (the “official” story).

The photos used were likely from 2006 of the children and not 2012.

In statistics, we can combine odds of two separate events. This can quickly get complicated, and combines art with science. In the approximation of odds of alleged mothers’ ages combined with chemtrails occurring only once during 5840 satellite photos, perhaps an easier analogy will help:

Imagine a person driving to work and home along the same route five days a week, 50 weeks a year for 11 years (to approximate 5840 chances). On only one morning after these 11 years, government officials re-route traffic, and with no apparent reason to do so. The person is redirected into a construction zone (not away), where an alleged accident of astronomical odds kills the person. For illustration, the “official story” is a combination of mechanical failure and human error: a demolition wrecking ball is placed directly over the driver while he is stopped by officials, dropped, and crushed the person.

Is there a connection between the officials ordering the traffic re-route and the troubled official explanation of an “accident”?

One would have to ask, and answer that apparently there is. In our analogy:

  • Who ordered traffic to be re-routed when there was no apparent purpose?

  • What was the purpose of the re-route?

The sheer improbability of the one morning among ~5500 of a usual commute being exactly the one morning of an impossible “accident” requiring violations of let’s say a dozen safety protocols must be investigated by any rational person wanting the facts.

Let’s look at our combination of chemtrails and alleged mothers’ ages:

  • Who ordered the non-commercial flights to spray what chemicals over Sandy Hook on the morning of December 14, 2012?

  • Who approved these multiple flights spraying those chemicals? What was the purpose of the spraying?

The sheer improbability of the one morning among ~5840 of chemical spraying obscuring satellite photos providing helpful data to explain the facts of an apparently impossible “mass shooting” requiring violations of let’s say a dozen response protocols must be investigated by any rational person wanting the facts.

These are just a few anomalies of thousands concerning Sandy Hook. Too bad they censored everything. One thing the media and government doesn't want anyone knowing about is psyops and fakery.

They want you to believe everything on the news is real, or real with bias.

[–]hennaojisan 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Good grief man. You usually do a lot of research but this time you have outdone yourself. What about a book published under a different name? That would be risky though. Didn't two people closely related to Sandy Hook, die under unusual circumstances less than a year ago?

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Look into weatherwar and nextrad technology.

[–]hennaojisan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm making a note now. Thanks.