you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]cmdrrockawesome 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why not just assume that with the massive influx of media companies in the modern internet age and smaller local and regional media outlets getting access to a much, much wider audience via the internet, the reporting of shootings in general and school shootings specifically has increased drastically? Why is your scenario more believable?

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not more believable, yours is. But it doesn't make it the truth. I will not convince you. And I won't post to you anything more than to watch the videos I linekd to you, including UK critical Thinker's series on Manchester, Orlando and the Fort Luaderdale shooting. He has plent yof others but unlike fake journalism, that spends little time on research, UK will spend years researchign an event, the timelines, the people involved, etc., I think you'll get a different perspective on the perspecitive of state conducted PSYOPs, which are highly effective at shaping public behavior and far easier and safer for them.

And has that drastic increase happened during the start or influx in teh modern internet age or in 2012 when they passed the Smith Mundt Modernization Act. And why even pass legislation to conduct PSYOPS and propaganda legally and domestically?