Are you going to single handedly solve climate change the way you solved 9/11 two decades later using the same faulty logic premise

No. The method doesn't apply to historical events. You can't science that, and I was deluding myself in that respect. The method does, however, apply to science. And this is science.

Countless anti-climate-hoaxers are delusional, misinformed or mistaken. I'm probably one of them. There are almost certainly a small few who are doing it right, but I haven't found them yet. That video looks promising.

Find your own data and prove or disprove it for yourself.

So far I haven't found any that disproves my hypothesis. But I don't know where to look to find the "non-manipulated data" that everyone's going on about but never providing. I was wondering whether anyone could at least point me in that direction.

But yes. Coming in here and acting all high and mighty whilst not actually doing anything is a pretty shitty thing to do. I forget that this is interaction with real humans.

When has the media ever not lied to you?

First article on BBC News at time of writing: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-47457477 This doesn't seem to be a lie. This article on chlorine-washed chicken seems fairly informative too.

The media has not lied to me lots. It's said that the sky is usually blue during the daytime when not occluded by clouds.

This, however, is an exercise in pedantry. Just because there exist incidents of the media not lying doesn't even mean that the media doesn't usually lie. For all you know, these could be the only three instances of non-lying media… ever! (It's not; there exists at least one more.)