you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

He likes to disagree to undermine the argument. There's an assumption that a reader won't finish long text. Then circle back to agree in the end to placate the criticized persons.

Shill tactics.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Or maybe he's thinking out loud, processing it, and coming to a conclusion.

I'm not a fan of that kind of content but I'm not calling him a shill.

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Or maybe he's thinking out loud,

Yes, that's usually what's happening. But, in this case, I was elaborating. I think that /u/Tom_Bombadil and I are actually in a rare agreement.