use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~4 users here now
Wikipedia is unbiased
submitted 4 years ago by [deleted] from files.catbox.moe
[–]gr4eagh4ew3 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (4 children)
The current article here still includes this information, but the structure of the article has been edited in terms of numerosity of accessibly-documented incidents, as opposed to timeline for example. It is a bias, but I believe it would be equally biased to choose the original format as well.
Also, I believe the original is factually questionable, as no source alleges Berg invented the device, simply that he was head of a department involved in its use.
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (3 children)
You created an account 9 hours ago to make this point?
Thanks for the shill/propaganda commentary.
[–]ANAL_McDICK_RAPE 3 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 6 fun - 4 years ago (2 children)
You'll lose your shit when you see how recently I made this account to come here and call you retarded.
[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - 4 years ago (1 child)
You're a modern day Shakespeare!
+3
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (0 children)
Why, thank you!
[–]Bastardio 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 4 years ago (3 children)
Almost as though they want to cover up the involvement of a jew in inventing this, its still ommitted from the current article.
[–]tendimensions 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (2 children)
Why is it relevant if a Jew invented it or not. Because it was then used on Jews? So?
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (0 children)
Was it? Are you sure?
[–]Bastardio 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (0 children)
Because the inventor of this horror needs identifying,if he was jewish then thats a historical fact,why edit it out? Fairly sure if he was a muslim the edit would not have happened.The whole point of wiki is unbiased is that no religious group should have their history sanitized to suit a script.
[–]Robin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (7 children)
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Wikipedia/Problems
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 4 years ago* (5 children)
The Core Problem. In 2013 Jimmy Wales stated that "the biggest issue is editor diversity".[1] This may be just a symptom of Wikipedia's establishment-friendly policies. Their policies about "notability" and "reliable sources" effectively muzzle Wikipedia's potential to speak truth to power by reducing it to a mere on-line extension of the Operation Mockingbird controlled pro-establishment media. Specifically: Certain truths are unwelcome to the the powers that be - i.e. those that contradict the official narrative of the existing power structures. The more unwelcome such truths, the more Wikipedia articles pertaining to them will tend to be compromised by agents of those structures. For the most threatening topics, Wikipedia's "reliable sources" policy pretty much guarantees that the compromise will be fundamental.
The Core Problem.
In 2013 Jimmy Wales stated that "the biggest issue is editor diversity".[1] This may be just a symptom of Wikipedia's establishment-friendly policies. Their policies about "notability" and "reliable sources" effectively muzzle Wikipedia's potential to speak truth to power by reducing it to a mere on-line extension of the Operation Mockingbird controlled pro-establishment media. Specifically:
Certain truths are unwelcome to the the powers that be - i.e. those that contradict the official narrative of the existing power structures. The more unwelcome such truths, the more Wikipedia articles pertaining to them will tend to be compromised by agents of those structures. For the most threatening topics, Wikipedia's "reliable sources" policy pretty much guarantees that the compromise will be fundamental.
TLDR: Shills are disproportionately active at Wikipedia and whitewash the historical facts.
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago* (4 children)
I kind of like this whole mixed bag of truth machinations though. It leaves you to think on your feet, what is it that you want to believe in by bombarding you with contradictory information claiming to be fact.
I'd rather live in a just world, will minimal deception.
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago* (2 children)
What are you? a lone extremist with emotions in an isolated room with idealistic narratives and a simple mindset?
Grow up buttercup. Reality is deception. Have a little fun with the contradictions and stand up against the real evils like cannibalism, pedophilia and incest. (Yuck!) Also other evils like: enforced boredom and sedentary lifestyles.
Just go exercise!
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 4 years ago (1 child)
What are you?
I'm a buttercup.
[–]PM_ME_DARKNESS_LEWDS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (0 children)
I thought you were a merry fellow?
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 4 years ago (0 children)
Course: Zionist Editing on Wikipedia
[–]gr4eagh4ew3 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]ANAL_McDICK_RAPE 3 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 6 fun - (2 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - (1 child)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Bastardio 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (3 children)
[–]tendimensions 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Bastardio 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Robin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (7 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (5 children)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–]PM_ME_DARKNESS_LEWDS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)