you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Farseli 18 insightful - 2 fun18 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I'm not surprised in the least. I remember when they banned A cups in porn (sorry wife, Australia thinks your body would only be enjoyed by pedos, or that it encourages pedos? Something?).

[–]YellowDuck_no_rubber 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No way this is a thing, ridiculous.

[–]Farseli 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

To be fair (though not much better), it's actually if the woman appears to be under the age of 18 that the title is banned.

Because it's subjective, titles banned more often feature women with petite features including A cups. The result is still them telling some women that their bodies don't look adult enough to be in porn, despite being of legal age.

So no, A cups are still allowed provided the net result isn't the woman looking underage.

I just phrase it as A cups being banned because it's still true that breast size is taken into account when determining if the title will receive classification and that A cups make it more likely to be banned. Also that my wife is an A cup and she finds it disgusting and insulting that they even consider it.

But, you know, "think of the children".