you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bucetao6969 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

He got banned pre-ellon also Ellon unbanned Trump so maybe it's just a matter of someone having enough interest to unban him. Your argument doesn't really work.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Your justification doesn't work.

Elon himself has said everyone should have freedom of speech BUT not freedom of reach - making up new bullshit limitations and rules as he goes.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Kind of makes sense: “old man yells obscenities at clouds”. Should the whole world hear it? Should it reach the sky?

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's not what it is.

They intentionally throttle content. That means that if it was going to organically reach many people, they would stop it.

A bunch of old men yelling at clouds will get boring and will not get popular unless there's something unique and/or authentic about it. Nothing can get popular unless it's allowed to. This is SOFT CENSORSHIP, no matter how you spin it.

[–]bucetao6969 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

BUT not freedom of reach

This does makes sense.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They intentionally throttle content. That means that if it was going to organically reach many people, they would stop it.

A bunch of old men yelling at clouds will get boring and will not get popular unless there's something unique and/or authentic about it. Nothing can get popular unless it's allowed to. This is SOFT CENSORSHIP, no matter how you spin it.