all 7 comments

[–]Drewski 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

3d printed weapons should be used for defense, not terrorism. Smearing all 3d firearms enthusiasts as far right extremist terrorists is typical UK propaganda. If you're interested in continuing the proud American tradition of building your own firearms:

https://ctrlpew.com/ - free

https://defcad.com/ - paid subscription, accepts bitcoin

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

It should be depending on the weapon not a blanket law like they are doing. I don't care if you have a store's worth of hunting rifles or Glock 22's within arm's reach to defend yourself but people have no business storing near military precision weapons. Those have ZERO place outside of a 'well regulated milita' whether that's government or a private militia as long as it's an organized militia which was the case prior to 1775.

Home owners had access to basic weapons for self defense but the 'cold blooded murder' weapons were usually stored in a storage depot that was locked only accessible by keys which were placed in the hands of trusted people who knew NOT ONLY to not misuse them but be willing to lay their lives down to stop those who try to break in and steal them.

[–]chadwickofwv 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Just can't wait to kneel before your masters can you?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your the fake one here! Buh bye and go get your beatings over with!

[–]Drewski 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't care if you have a store's worth of hunting rifles or Glock 22's within arm's reach to defend yourself but people have no business storing near military precision weapons.

I don't care whether you approve of right to bear firearms or not. Many of the founding fathers specifically stated one of the primary purposes of the Second Amendment was to defend against tyranny and overreach by the federal government. There was and is no requirement to be part of a militia to own firearms, this is just modern semantics used to attack private gun ownership.

Home owners had access to basic weapons for self defense but the 'cold blooded murder' weapons were usually stored in a storage depot that was locked only accessible by keys which were placed in the hands of trusted people who knew NOT ONLY to not misuse them but be willing to lay their lives down to stop those who try to break in and steal them.

"Cold blooded murder" weapon is an arbitrary distinction that you are making. Any firearm can be used to commit murder, just as any weapon can be used in self defense. The federal government, which we know to be corrupt and overreaching, should not have access to firearms that citizens do not. I trust them to uphold my right to self defense about as much as I trust a misguided internet commenter.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But there's a difference between a Glock 22 and a machine gun. Like I said I don't care if you own a gazillion Glock 22's as you have to be more precise with them and you have a higher chance of surviving being shot by one (unless you are very precise) then with a machine gun or weapons close too that status.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Really they just figured it out now? I thought it was removed eons ago! They are LAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTE!!!!!!