you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Their entire position is based in complete bullshit.

You claim that there's no such thing as the greenhouse effect?

[–]Davethe_blank_ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

CO2 is not prevalent enough, nor will it ever be enough to be a driver of the temperature due to greenhouse gas effect. Water vapor already absorbs the same spectrums.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

CO2 is not prevalent enough,

Really. How much CO2 do you claim it would take to raise the temperature by 3°C?

You know, given science estimates about a doubling.

nor will it ever be enough to be a driver of the temperature due to greenhouse gas effect. Water vapor already absorbs the same spectrums.

Exactly? Wow.

So when the James Webb telescope detected CO2 in the atmosphere of WASP-39 b, already known to have water in it, they just lied, because the CO2 would be masked by the water!

And when you look at an absorbance spectrum of the atmosphere, and you see that CO2 main absorption around 4.3 microns doesnt overlap with water at all, and that it fills in the weak absorption of water between about 13 and 17 microns, what do people like you see?

https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-6c88e20a95b9388752c995f911591be6-pjlq