all 7 comments

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Did anyone here ever believe in Zuckerberg not being just another (dumbass) puppet ?

Why for any pubic hair on this world's sake did the CIA cancel "their" social network when "his"(stolen) business started to scale ?

This isn't the first and surely ain't the last time he is loosing his shit to the max of most maximums.

If his shareholders had any balls, they had ditched him a long time ago.

But they don't like being seen by "public" eyes, i strongly believe. The fact that endless greed shrinks even microdicks shall stay a "secret", i suppose.

[–]raven9 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You mean lifelog? Because if it belonged to the state, contitutional restrictions would apply.

[–]StillLessons 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Distraction. "They made us do it." Horseshit. You were all on the same page (Trump is DANGEROUS and must be stopped!!! [tearing your hair out...]) and you know it. This response, however, is interesting in that it is becoming apparent to the elites that this story cannot be buried. They thought they could just let it die, but Zuckerberg's retreating in this way tells us they now recognize that people have figured out that they are lying to protect the regime, and will not accept other explanations. Thus, Zuckerberg's story changes from "It's propaganda!" to "The FBI told us to do it." Once the finger-pointing begins, they are trying to gain the trust of the masses who know the protection racket we're watching. The only remaining question is "Is there any soul alive who is going to believe Zuckerberg was an innocent victim in this story?" Those souls willing to buy this new spin on the same old shit seem to me only to exist among the idiots who from the beginning bought the whole Democrat line. In other words, changing his story in this manner will move the needle not at all.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Anyone who cooperates with Federal agencies is the problem. I don't respect anyone who believes the American government should exist.

[–]agent_pecan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Rogan appeared sympathetic to Zuckerberg's predicament, especially regarding the FBI's warning of Russian propaganda. ....

you had reason to believe based on the FBI talking to you that it wasn't real and that there was going to be some propaganda. So what do you do?" Rogan said. "And then, if you just let it get out there AND WHAT IF IT CHANGES the election and it turns out to be bulls---, that's a real problem. And I would imagine that those kinds of decisions are the most difficult."

That is exactly what happened Joe!

[–]SoCo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Play ball or the Democrats will reign in big tech like they promised and held over your head for the last several years. He'll pay to have more election manipulation companies preform wide spread fraud of the next election too, else he'll get the Congressional whipping.

[–]buffalo_fart_the_VII 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Both faggots. Bet after the podcast they spent an hr in each other's guard, eyes locked.