all 15 comments

[–]IkeConn 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Facebook just fucked up. I am going to enjoy watching this.

[–][deleted] 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Was just about to write something similar. I'm glad they banned Ron Paul, he can potentially do something about it.

[–]raven9 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

This is just zio-fascist jews banning people for pointing out the bullshit that another zio-fascist Jew said.

[–]WalkingIn2Madness 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sperg Berg.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

The lobby dollars didn't bother stopping by Ron Paul's Congressional office.
Nothing for sale there.

Rand, ain't no Ron.

Not sure I know what Rand is actually up to.
He seems mostly good. The lobbies visit his office.

Pretty sure both are masons.

[–]StillLessons 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Silicon Fuckheads have ceased trying to hide their true motivations. This has nothing to do with quality of information and everything to do with censorship. Even their allies know this to be true; they just approve of it.

[–]Antarchomachus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I mean...there isn't going be to anyone left on Facebook or Twitter in a few years at the rate they are dropping ban hammers

[–]BravoVictor 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No no no. Banning actual doctors for questioning contradictory statements by big pharma CEOs is definitely a good look for Facebook...

Seriously. I think only boomers are still using Facebook.

[–]trumplost90x 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Fact-checks = shill-liars.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Fact+checkers+money = shill+liar.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

By definition the fact-checkers are paid.

There are no transparent charitable honest fact-checkers, and if there were, they'd be discredited, called misinformation conspiracy theorists, and never be cited by the corrupt establishment.

[–]StillLessons 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That fact-check has gotten a wide airing. I'd be surprised if people on here weren't familiar with what it said before you chose to put it here.

Their argument is that because Bourla was talking about Omicron, that doesn't mean the shots don't work for Covid. Okay. So the shots work for alpha and beta. Hm. How many alpha and beta cases are there now? Oh, yeah. None. Because the virus mutates, the successful mutants become dominant, and the ancestral origins of the virus become meaningless.

Omicron is the current successful form of the virus. It is outcompeting the other strains. Omicron will be the strain from which future strains are derived. If you're not controlling Omicron - which IS what Bourla said - then you will have no control over the future of covid.

This fact check is a trivial misdirection. The meaning of what Bourla said fits exactly the interpretation that this fact-check desperately wishes it didn't.

[–]WalkingIn2Madness 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Who needs tard book.