New form of censorship?
submitted 2 years ago by magnora7 from (self.censorship)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Node 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (3 children)
Put it up for adoption. I'd adopt that post.
If that's what's happening, it's pretty tricksy. Can you look at recent orphan posts to see if it's been happening very much?
[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (2 children)
Can you look at recent orphan posts to see if it's been happening very much?
I shouldn't admit it, but no. It's like poof gone even in admin view. Hopefully I'm missing something.
[–]magnora7[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (1 child)
I was only able to link to it because I had a comment in the thread I could go back and look at. Had I not had this to produce the URL, I don't know how one could find it again. And maybe google doesn't index it in to their search engine then either.
So it basically disappears from the internet unless you already know the direct URL or had a comment in that thread...
[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
agreed
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~3 users here now
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Node 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - (3 children)
[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - (2 children)
[–]magnora7[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)