you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Flicksener 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

I don't think there's a good case that can be made against her. Freedom of speech and all that. She's also stating a biological fact, which can't be considered a "hate crime," whatever that means, unless nature and human evolution are also considered hate crimes these days. Wouldn't surprise me.

[–][deleted]  (9 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Flicksener 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

    But "It's okay to be white" isn't a biological fact. It's subjective. "Only biological women are female" is a fact. It's about as factual from a scientific point of view as something could be.

    But I understand what you're saying. Even if it were considered a hate crime, she did nothing wrong, other than deface private property. They'll have an easier time charging her with defacing private property than with a hate crime, frankly.

    [–][deleted]  (7 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Flicksener 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

      I mean, I don't have anything against one saying it's okay to be white, especially when faced with hostility claiming otherwise, but I just find the phrase kind of pointless and self-serving, much like "black lives matter."

      It doesn't matter what skin color you are. Why is it an issue? It hadn't been an issue since the 80s. If they want to make it an issue again and start attacking white people for the "sin" of being white, then fuck them, it's okay to be white, and they can go to hell. I'd say the same if I were any other "color" and someone were attacking me for it, or if I had a friend who was another color and they were attacking him (or her) for it.

      But there's no need to state the obvious unless it's necessary to do so, because, apparently, a small yet vocal minority of hysterical screeching bigots are trying to bring it back, and they're succeeding, and to them I say, it's okay to be white, and you can go fuck yourself. But only if they continue attacking.

      [–][deleted]  (5 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]Flicksener 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

        I don't disagree with you that there is an anti-white, anti-male, anti-heterosexual movement in the West. It's here, it's obvious, it's growing, and it's definitely alarming. I just don't think it's going to amount to much because, ultimately, you can't have a society without straight white (European) men, at least not like we have today.

        Straight white men created and have helped maintain most of what we have today, and you can't remove them from the picture and steal everything they built without it falling apart on the would be thieves. Not only that, but straight white men aren't going to go down without a fight. Some will, but most won't.

        Extreme leftist woke dogma is an innately hypocritical, contradictory, suicidal ideology. Believers want to take what isn't theirs thinking they're "equal" to those who built it despite all evidence suggesting otherwise. If they succeed, it'll be short lived, it'll fall apart, and wherever white people end up will become the new mecca, as has always happened throughout history. Assuming they aren't exterminated, that is, which I don't think will happen. Probably.

        Wokeism is steeped in Communism, which is inherently ideologically flawed and unsustainable. It can't work, and it won't. Not for long. It doesn't live in reality. It's divisive, it's ignorant, it's self-contradictory, and it doesn't make sense.

        So, I'm not too concerned that they'll succeed. It's all just propaganda for now. Painful, irritating propaganda, but propaganda nonetheless.

        [–][deleted]  (2 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]Flicksener 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          Oh I'm taking it seriously, I just don't think it has any legs to stand on. Even if they do succeed and "take over," whatever that means, how long do you think it'll last? A few decades? Maybe a hundred years at most? The cream always rises back to the top, if they don't wipe all that cream off the face of the earth first.

          I'd be more concerned about China as Asians are, on average, smarter and more capable than white people at developing stuff and keeping things going and, frankly, order and obedience and tradition and conformity. Unfortunately, they tend to bring that pesky Communism with them wherever they go, which always leads to misery and disaster, hence why they aren't quite as dominant as the West. But China is catching up, and fast, assuming it doesn't collapse in on itself in the next few decades. They also tend to be hierarchical to a fault, and seem more interested in saving face than correcting mistakes. But we'll see how it goes.

          [–]WhoFlu 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          ultimately, you can't have a society without straight white (European) men, at least not like we have today.

          That's precisely what "they" are trying to get rid of. They being the people in power. They want to get rid of the independent thinkers, entrepreneurs, those with western-values, people who believe in fundamental rights, and christian-inspired values. Those people are an obstacle to their global control.