Twitter Bans Posting Any Links From BitChute as "Harmful"

submitted by scrubking from bigleaguepolitics.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bjam27 20 insightful - 3 fun20 insightful - 2 fun21 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Every tech competitor is immediately labeled harmful and racist.

[–]VirgilGriff 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

What competitors? SV tech companies all conspire with each other to enforce an ideological hegemony.

[–]Trajan 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What's worse is they don't even need to conspire. The political homogeneity is refined to the point that they'll arrive at comparable positions even if they don't conspire with each other. Anybody who isn't on the identitarian crazy train must either go along with or risk being excluded. The California cult will react in unison because they all either think the same way or fear being ostracised for not toeing the party line.

[–]SharpTomorrow 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What's worse is they don't even need to conspire.

But they do conspire, they are all part of the same discord channels or mailing lists and they do talk to each other.

[–]Trajan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sure, I expect there's side-channel communication, whether at the top or at lower levels. For example, HR people are not allowed to disclose that a person was fired, or why they were fired. That doesn't stop them from talking off the record to other HR people they know in other companies. The point is, this collusion isn't even necessary. The people who control corporate America are either thinking the same or they know how to behave so they won't be othered by their peers. They don't need to collude once one of them denounces a person or a group. The rest know to follow suit.