"Big Tech Has Become A Tool Of Totalitarian Fascism" - Google Has 'Memory-Holed' The Great Barrington Declaration

submitted by zyxzevn from zerohedge.com

all 15 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]hennaojichan 12 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

For a start we can boycott FaceBook and Twitter. I use neither.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fascists would never do something like this. Fascists would carefully isolate sick people.

This is totalitarian tyranny, not fascism.

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

"I'm not happy about the lockdowns so that means America is a fascist state" is a whiny and thoroughly unsurprising position coming from you lot.

[–]zyxzevn[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Being retarded does not make lockdowns legal.

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

You're right. It's SCOTUS having already decided on this issue like 200 years ago that does.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

You just love to support federal oversight, don't you?

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

No, I think the federal government has gotten way too large and is just completely ignoring the 10th Amendment at this point. That doesn't change the fact that SCOTUS ruled quarantines are legal like 200 years ago.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You need to learn English. Quarantine means isolating SICK people. Not people who tested positive on some bogus test and who are perfectly fine. Quarantine does not mean isolating healthy people or forcing them to wear face diapers.

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

About the level of retardation I've come to expect from you. You could have bothered to try to look up the actual case, which specifically dealt with the constitutionality of a general ban. You also could have stopped to ask yourself if your narrow definition can actually stand up to scrutiny. But of course, you didn't. Nope, just more retard spew from you, as usual.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Why don't you scrutinize it, and then we'll all see how well it holds up to your mighty brain?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

...and? I didn't vote for any of these people. The bureaucrats can interpret (read: change) the law however they want. I don't give a shit.

I almost wish that this was a real pandemic. I think there are too many people here. I was really interested in this when it first came out, because I figured that nature would be the ones to bring us down. Guess what? That's not what's happening, it's just more 9/11-level psyop bullshit, now brought to every country.

"Aaand remember folks, toe the line or your grandma might die from covid!"

[–]ANIKAHirsch 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

nature

No, no.. try "Chinese lab".

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I was speaking of my initial reaction to this pandemic nonsense. At first, I truly wanted to believe that Nature had brewed civilization's demise.

Now I realize that coronavirus is nothing new, and this current iteration of it appears to be fucked with and administered by the globalists through China, which they own and operate many fucked up operations out of.

Nature would've been more deadly.

[–]jet199 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed that "fascist" is over used and almost always wrongly used right now.

I've gotten so used to it I didn't even notice it in the title until you pointed it out.

[–]ANIKAHirsch 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"Well, on Oct. 4, a group of scientists from Oxford, Harvard, Stanford and other distinguished academic institutions from around the world published the Great Barrington Declaration, a brief statement offering an alternative public policy approach. Instead of mandating business closures, lockdowns should be lifted, and a shift to 'focused protection' should be implemented. Resources should be focused to protect the vulnerable (the elderly and those with CDC-designated risk factors). The young and health population should be allowed to live normally, with the hope that they would eventually build up immunity."

But that would just best protect everyone and allow us to recover as a population. That's not what they want!