Here's yet another example of SJW TRAs censoring a scientist this year

submitted by ISaidWhatISaid from retractionwatch.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ANIKAHirsch 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

These lily-livered yellow-bellied cowards will be the end of us. Bowing to the regime does not get us out. The journal never should have retracted his paper.

But his response makes this so much worse.. literally agreeing that his paper had weaknesses, the scope of his study was "disrespectful", thinking that they simply misunderstood his points.. ludicrous. Why even give lip service to their false narratives?

He needs to come out and expose the real agenda.

[–]ISaidWhatISaid[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But his response makes this so much worse.. literally agreeing that his paper had weaknesses, the scope of his study was "disrespectful", thinking that they simply misunderstood his points.. ludicrous. Why even give lip service to their false narratives?

He has to grovel and kiss the trannie ring, otherwise he won't have a career in science anymore. You can't expect the average scientist to come out and sacrifice their career. Several scientists have already done that, and for what? They just lost their jobs and were replaced by TRA academics. It had no impact on academia at large at all.