all 6 comments

[–]m68k 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Wasn't this already in their policy?

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nah, pedos were allowed to post anime cp in /b/. IMO its a good thing they banned em, but 8kun still sucks and codemonkey is a literal trumpie zionist

[–]CompleteDoubterII[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

First posted this on Notabug.

[–]C3P0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

My belief is similar to Einstein's. If you can't concretely define the criteria, then you don't have any ground to stand on. If the artist named the painting obscenely then that could be argued obscene. However, the slippery slope is quite steep. Next wrinkle-less anime characters are banned. Afterwards, real photographs are banned of 18-year-olds who look too young.

I also completely disagree with Justice Stewart's, "I know it when I see it." Define it or leave the bench.

[–]zephyranthes 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And yet you do know what "loli" is when replying to this thread.

[–]C3P0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Clarify what you mean or state your point.