top 100 commentsshow all 101

[–][deleted] 46 insightful - 3 fun46 insightful - 2 fun47 insightful - 3 fun -  (52 children)

I watched this interview a few days ago.

The gist is that the daughter became indoctrinated around 14 years old by Tumblr/Deviantart - before this time she was very feminine, never presented as masculine. When she was about 17 or 18 she decided to go on testosterone. The mother did a bunch of research and saw that the likelihood of women having heart attacks on testosterone is extremely high, and since they have heart disease running through the family, the likelihood of her having a fatal heart attack before 30 is very high. The daughter said dying before 30 would be worth it to have a beard and a deeper voice. The daughter considers herself a gay man, even though her boyfriend considers himself a straight man.

There wasn't anything hateful in the video. Just a very sad mom who obviously loves her child a lot.

edit: it's still on Spotify

[–][deleted] 30 insightful - 3 fun30 insightful - 2 fun31 insightful - 3 fun -  (22 children)

I've moved out to an area that doesn't get cell service (nearest service around 45 mins away) - and there aren't any crazy people. The "always connected" brain cancer normies are absorbing from echo chamber social media sites is destroying their ability to discern sane from insane, and real from fantasy.

If we want to make the world somewhat sane again - we need to get rid of smart phones. Worst invention to date. It makes me feel daft that I didn't realize how harmful these things were until I was in an area that didn't have them - and saw firsthand how (eliminating them) affects folks.

[–]ISaidWhatISaid 24 insightful - 2 fun24 insightful - 1 fun25 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

We know exactly how harmful smartphones are (and don't think adults are harmed by them, just less so than kids) but everyone from schools, to employers to governments to credit card companies are forcing you to own one and use one daily. It's not like you can opt out.

The biggest difference between the Millennials and their predecessors was in how they viewed the world; teens today differ from the Millennials not just in their views but in how they spend their time. The experiences they have every day are radically different from those of the generation that came of age just a few years before them.

What happened in 2012 to cause such dramatic shifts in behavior? It was after the Great Recession, which officially lasted from 2007 to 2009 and had a starker effect on Millennials trying to find a place in a sputtering economy. But it was exactly the moment when the proportion of Americans who owned a smartphone surpassed 50 percent.

The more I pored over yearly surveys of teen attitudes and behaviors, and the more I talked with young people like Athena, the clearer it became that theirs is a generation shaped by the smartphone and by the concomitant rise of social media. I call them iGen. Born between 1995 and 2012, members of this generation are growing up with smartphones, have an Instagram account before they start high school, and do not remember a time before the internet. The Millennials grew up with the web as well, but it wasn’t ever-present in their lives, at hand at all times, day and night. iGen’s oldest members were early adolescents when the iPhone was introduced, in 2007, and high-school students when the iPad entered the scene, in 2010. A 2017 survey of more than 5,000 American teens found that three out of four owned an iPhone.

...

More comfortable in their bedrooms than in a car or at a party, today’s teens are physically safer than teens have ever been. They’re markedly less likely to get into a car accident and, having less of a taste for alcohol than their predecessors, are less susceptible to drinking’s attendant ills.

Psychologically, however, they are more vulnerable than Millennials were: Rates of teen depression and suicide have skyrocketed since 2011. It’s not an exaggeration to describe iGen as being on the brink of the worst mental-health crisis in decades. Much of this deterioration can be traced to their phones.

In the early 1970s, the photographer Bill Yates shot a series of portraits at the Sweetheart Roller Skating Rink in Tampa, Florida. In one, a shirtless teen stands with a large bottle of peppermint schnapps stuck in the waistband of his jeans. In another, a boy who looks no older than 12 poses with a cigarette in his mouth. The rink was a place where kids could get away from their parents and inhabit a world of their own, a world where they could drink, smoke, and make out in the backs of their cars. In stark black-and-white, the adolescent Boomers gaze at Yates’s camera with the self-confidence born of making your own choices—even if, perhaps especially if, your parents wouldn’t think they were the right ones.

Fifteen years later, during my own teenage years as a member of Generation X, smoking had lost some of its romance, but independence was definitely still in. My friends and I plotted to get our driver’s license as soon as we could, making DMV appointments for the day we turned 16 and using our newfound freedom to escape the confines of our suburban neighborhood. Asked by our parents, “When will you be home?,” we replied, “When do I have to be?”

But the allure of independence, so powerful to previous generations, holds less sway over today’s teens, who are less likely to leave the house without their parents. The shift is stunning: 12th-graders in 2015 were going out less often than eighth-graders did as recently as 2009.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/09/has-the-smartphone-destroyed-a-generation/534198/

[–]Cass 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Thank you for posting this, very interesting article.

Sounds like they want to have a say in the world and feel special while at the same time having a very limited world-view and being dependent on their parents.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It's really a terrible mix. And the super-lefties are the worst of those.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is worth reading in this regard, as it is much overlooked and plays a huge role in the current trend of disappearing mental health: https://saidit.net/s/Consciousness/comments/68z3/the_removal_of_safeguards_against_toxic_thoughts/

[–][deleted]  (17 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    I have a smartphone. I use it to take pictures from time to time, but I have to charge it first. It sits in the powder room, uncharged, just the way I like it. If I feel I REALLY REALLY need it, I can charge it and use it. But mostly I don't. I don't like listening, tracking and totalitarian surveillance devices. Go figure.

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

      There is a new linux-based smartphone that has HARDWARE SWITCHES for the mic, cam, wi-fi, and basically every function.

      This is my next phone: https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2019/11/pinephone-specs-price-release-date

      [–]Kikeniggertransfaggo 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Cool phone

      [–][deleted]  (12 children)

      [removed]

        [–][deleted]  (11 children)

        [deleted]

          [–][deleted]  (10 children)

          [removed]

            [–]C3P0 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

            No sympathy for drug users. I hope it's a million ice picks.

            [–][deleted]  (2 children)

            [removed]

              [–]C3P0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

              Wild assumptions there.

              Also, you might want to get that shift key repaired.

              [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

              That is rough dude. Drugs are FUN

              [–]C3P0 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

              I am sure. Just don't let it affect the lives of others.

              [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

              Yep, my use has never impacted anybody else.

              [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

              Drugs don't make the addiction. Soldiers leaving Vietnam who had been doing heroin daily for months or years came home to their families, stopped cold turkey and never showed withdrawal symptoms. A large number of them.

              There are some documentaries out there demonstrating how the cause of addiction is psychological and has nothing to do with the substance.

              [–][deleted]  (1 child)

              [deleted]

                [–]asterias 17 insightful - 2 fun17 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

                The daughter considers herself a gay man, even though her boyfriend considers himself a straight man.

                If she wanted to have sex with a man, why should she grow a beard and weaken her health for that? This tranny cult has become really dangerous and youtube is a part of that.

                [–]florasis 14 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

                She clearly got some gay fetish or wanting to be more special than a simple hetero girl.

                [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

                a lot of women ship characters that are straight to be two gay guys, like a lot want iron man and cap america to be gay together. Someone should do a peer reviewed study on why they want this.

                [–]jet199 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

                Yeah, it's not like men ever obsess over lesbians or anything weird like that.

                [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

                good point

                I don't get that either I mean I get it's two hot girls and 2 is better than one but I don't get the wanting them to be in a relationship part

                [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

                Can these tranny pseudomales even have an erection ever? Orgasm, I think not?

                [–]jet199 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

                They put an air pump in one of their fake ball bags. In not even kidding.

                [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                Ugh. This is beyond revolting.

                All this because they choose to believe demented thoughts in their minds instead of looking at the REALITY of which sex they are. It really is that simple.

                But that's in great part because of the disappearance of traditional safeguards against toxic thoughts. More on that here: https://saidit.net/s/Consciousness/comments/68z3/the_removal_of_safeguards_against_toxic_thoughts/o8j1?context=3

                [–]Canbot 11 insightful - 5 fun11 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 5 fun -  (17 children)

                It seems at this point you have to become Amish to protect your kids.

                [–]florasis 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

                I pity parents. Being parents is hard, and with internet influence is even harder.

                [–]crazyangryfemale 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

                Amish men have children, rape their female children, let their male children rape their female children, rape other female children, & no female child-adolescent-or-adult is allowed to speak about it within the community

                https://www.cosmopolitan.com/lifestyle/a30284631/amish-sexual-abuse-incest-me-too/

                [–]Canbot 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                Wow, you really swallowed that propaganda hook line and sinker.

                I don't know how to break it to you but the media is corrupt as fuck. Especially far leftist media like cosmopolitan. They hate white people, and the Amish have lots of kids. This is nothing more than a political hit piece.

                In one article the Cosmopolitan defends and tries to normalize pedophilia, and in the next they use it to attack white people. Don't be a sheep.

                Rape and incest are terrible, and I believe it could be happening in Amish communities. I don't believe that it is an epidemic, and I can't imagine ever being dumb enough to trust the Cosmopolitan to reveal the truth about anything.

                [–]JamalGinsberg 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                Sounds like a hit piece done by the degenerates that run those shitty magazines.

                [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                Are you Jewish by any chance?

                [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

                Teen Vogue and Cosmopolitan arre two magazines owned by Conde Nast and Hearst:

                https://scadconnector.com/2018/10/24/teen-vogue-and-cosmopolitan-tap-new-editor-in-chiefs/\

                They are both under new editorial management ;Teen Vogue is selling Marx to teen girls, full bore:

                https://www.teenvogue.com/story/who-is-karl-marx

                https://dailycitizen.focusonthefamily.com/teen-vogue-hails-communism-and-its-founder-karl-marx-ignores-millions-of-dead/

                https://www.foxnews.com/media/teen-vogue-slammed-for-tweeting-praise-about-karl-marx

                and Cosmopolitan is so deviant, Walmart pulled it from its checkout lines for cover stories like "How to Ring A Guy's Penis With A Donut", as reported by Vogue itself:

                https://www.vogue.com/article/walmart-cosmopolitan-metoo

                The fact is these magazines are political propoganda rags pushing Communism and attacking any form of traditional "patriarchy" , with the Amish- whose total numbers are barely a rounding error in our population- being an easy target.

                Once a media outlet gets taken over by the extreme left, you can't trust anything they say because lying to achieve their ends is a part and parcel of the left's arsenal. Like the NYTimes, they are riding on the fumes of whatever previous jounalistic integrity their former employees earned for them. That only works for a small window of time. Then the lights go out.

                [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

                You should mention that if a media apparatus is taken over by the far right, then the exact same things ensues, just with different topics and hit points.

                [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

                You say this but the "far right" media outlets I get information from don't seem to be doing this. This is coming from a life-long progressive (me). I can't think of a single thing pre-2004 I disagreed with progressives about except gun control and late term abortion. Now the left is literally, I mean literally insane. I went from an 1st term Obama voter to a Trump voter.

                So the terrible trhings you think the right is putting out there, I am not seeing those.

                Honestly, rationality and a respect for reason itself is all on the right now. So I moved there.

                [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

                You probably support the evils of industrialism if you think the right isn't corrupt.

                [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

                As opposed to working yourself to death by age 45 in subsistence farming or dying in childbirth or being prey to whatever disease mother nature rolls up for your consumption?

                Yeah. I do.

                [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

                There can be a technologically advanced society without industrialism. Industrialism simply has to precede the latter-society. We shouldn't stay here, we should morph the best of the Old World with the best of the New World, instead, y'all throw the baby out with the bath water. Industrialism is causing the sixth largest mass-extinction event this planet has ever seen. Tell me how dying at 45 is worse than seeing countrysides torn up, species of plants and animals disappearing (not due to natural causes, but due to industrialism)

                [–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                Obviously none of us here are one, but ... they do make some oddly prescient points about technological dangers....

                [–]Tarrock 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                This is why you ban kids from social media and block the sites from your router.

                [–]Zednix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                That spotify link is broken. Did it get nuked too?

                [–][deleted]  (52 children)

                [deleted]

                  [–]wecandobetter 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

                  Sorry about all the trolls. Saidit is wild.

                  [–][deleted] 12 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

                  I'd rather a hundred trolls be heard than a single person be silenced.

                  [–]wecandobetter 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

                  Well cheers to that good gentle-person.

                  [–]bald-janitor 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

                  'gentile' - person

                  [–]bald-janitor 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

                  You are wild

                  [–][deleted]  (2 children)

                  [removed]

                    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

                    Username doesn't check out.

                    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (43 children)

                    Why did you choose to have your parts butchered instead of getting your mind fixed though?

                    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

                    When did I say I had sexual reassignment surgery? Please send a link to the comment.

                    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

                    OK then why do you choose to believe the demented thoughts in your head instead of looking at the REALITY of your sex and just saying NO to the thoughts that lead to the feelings of gender dysphoria? You can say no to thoughts, you know.

                    Look: https://saidit.net/s/Consciousness/comments/68z3/the_removal_of_safeguards_against_toxic_thoughts/

                    And: https://saidit.net/s/Psychology/comments/58du/demons_are_real_psychiatric_experience_of_demons/

                    You can probably fight it off and cure yourself with just lots of determination and work.

                    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

                    I'm not transsexual, that's not even possible. My sex is male. I'm transgender: my gender is feminine. The difference between the two is that the former pertains to reproduction and the latter to ones role in society.

                    I don't have gender dysphoria, which is by definition a state of distress. I am not in distress. There is nothing to be distressed about. My sex is male, I have no problem with that. I can act in a manner that's natural to me, speak in a manner natural to me, dress how I please, and perform feminine tasks. There is nothing to be distressed over.

                    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

                    You are insane. There is no "gender as a social construct". That is by definition, INSANITY. Get your head straight, boi.

                    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

                    I didn't say it was a social construct, I said it was a social role. The former is something arbitrary that is not necessary, while the latter is objective and very necessary.

                    I can no longer trust that this discussion will be constructive, for you have falsely quoted me with words I have not said, thus will cease further replies in accordance with the pyramid of debate.

                    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                    Well, you use mumbo-jumbo that only people in your spheres of deviance and degeneracy are proficient at using, because they refer to things that sane people don't think about. As such, it's hard having any kind of discussion. But that is made on purpose. Do you realize this? Those who drive the agenda of normalizing insanity are very much behind the creation of a language that refers to delirious notions that sane people have no reference framework for, specifically so that discussion cannot ever be productively carried out.

                    This is a division through language, part of a "divide and conquer" doctrine that works perfectly at destroying what's left of our society because the insane simply WILL NOT express themselves with sane language. As such "but nobody understands us" becomes the perfect rationale for bigotry: "fuck you stupid normie, you don't understand anything" and similar things. I'm not attributing this statement to you, but I am attributing the attitude displayed in that statement to at least some of the community of insane lefties, trannies, etc.

                    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (11 children)

                    How the fuck is gender a social role. Please explain this. If women are blocked off from doing things in society, it's not because of "gender" it's because of society. Your gender and your sex are the same. Explain how one is real and the other is simply a "social role", or else people here will continue think of you as being a confused person. You do seem confused though, you seem to be mixing up gender roles with identity, which is sad. A woman isn't a woman cuz she can cook. Plenty of women can't cook. That doesn't mean a buff woman working a hard "man" job is then of the male gender. That's confusing and insane.

                    Not calling you insane, so don't bring up the pyramid. I want you to discuss this so Said it can see.

                    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

                    Even if you where calling my insane, I'm much more lenient on name-calling than I am on misquotes, which is the biggest thing that frustrates me. But, no, you aren't insulting me, and I haven't taken it in any such way.

                    You don't need to check every box to be a specific gender, rather there is a spectrum from feminine to masculine, which at times becomes vague, but is usually quite clear. A woman who can't cook is still a woman, but less so than one who can, and that's assuming that the ability to cook is even a feminine trait to begin with. There are plenty of other traits that woman has that makes her a woman.

                    If one is biologically female, but dresses like a man, behaves like a man, has a masculine name, can't cook, and has a masculine job, are they a woman or a man, for the purposes of social interaction? Would it be correct to assume that person would like feminine or masculine activities? Would it be correct to use masculine or feminine pronouns — for what reason do we use pronouns — and for what reason should we use pronouns?

                    I personally believe that for the purposes of social interaction that this individual is indeed a man. It would be more rational to assume one who is masculine would prefer that which is masculine, rather than that which is feminine.

                    The question of pronouns depends on your view of society. If you believe that we should be a sex culture, and that the purpose of pronouns should be a way to find potential mating partners, which I assume is why they evolved in the first place, then you would use feminine pronouns in this instance. If you instead believe that we should be a social culture, that pronouns should be a way to more easily associate people with either masculinity or femininity (and thus more accurately make assumptions about them), then you would use masculine pronouns.

                    I personally believe we should be a social culture. I would like to note that sex cultures are based primarily upon the sin of lust, thus religious arguments for sex cultures are much harder to make.

                    You are free to disagree, of course.

                    [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

                    I do disagree. There is no historical precedence for what you are talking about, unless you bring up creepy folk with creepy ideas. This philosophy is, to me, dangerous. Your gender is your sex, everything else is just preference. That doesn't make you the other gender ... Cooking isn't a woman thing, neither is working on the yard a man thing. They are just things that society attached concepts of gender to. That DOES NOT change your gender though.

                    To answer your question about a WOMAN who dresses like a man, acts like a man, etc.... SHE IS A WOMAN.

                    [–]zephyranthes 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                    A woman who can't cook is still a woman, but less so than one who can

                    If one is biologically female, but dresses like a man, behaves like a man, has a masculine name, can't cook, and has a masculine job, are they a woman or a man, for the purposes of social interaction? Would it be correct to assume that person would like feminine or masculine activities? Would it be correct to use masculine or feminine pronouns — for what reason do we use pronouns — and for what reason should we use pronouns?

                    I personally believe that for the purposes of social interaction that this individual is indeed a man.

                    You're saying a woman should be either barred from activities you decide are "masculine" or disqualified from womanhood. This is absurd misogyny.

                    If you believe that we should be a sex culture, and that the purpose of pronouns should be a way to find potential mating partners

                    The purpose of words is to accurately describe physical reality. I don't mate with dogs, cats, folding chairs, airplanes, and branches of mathematics, and yet it benefits me to know words to refer to these things. (It's as if objects and people you can't stick your dick into don't exist for you.) When I say, "a man", and later, for short, "he", I describe the person as being, to the best of my knowledge, of the male sex. I say "a man in a suit" if he's wearing a suit, or "a man in a dress" if he's wearing a dress, or "a bald man" if he's bald.

                    You previously mentioned a "social role". There are only two roles specific to men and women - biological fatherhood and motherhood - and transgender people cannot fulfill the role of their preferred sex by definition.

                    [–][deleted]  (24 children)

                    [deleted]

                      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

                      I am no supremacist of any kind. And my mind is absolutely healthy, thanks.

                      [–][deleted]  (22 children)

                      [deleted]

                        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

                        I am a nazi, a national socialist. The nazis of WW2 were not white supremacists, just as I am not. They wanted a homogeneous nation, as I do, because it's the only way to have a working nation. Supremacists believe their race is the only good one, to the point of advocating the genocide of others. Being a supremacist is being stupid, as every race has their advantage. This acknowledgement of each race's innate abilities is called "Classical Racism" and it is the GOOD kind of racism. Being a Nazi simply comes from an average or above intelligence and level of information and objectivity.

                        Blacks and Indians and Amerindians and Slavs and Asians and Aborigines and every other ethnic group would be nazis too, if they knew enough.

                        [–][deleted]  (15 children)

                        [deleted]

                          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

                          Am I wrong in deducing from your comment that you don't think this distinction exists?

                          [–][deleted]  (2 children)

                          [deleted]

                            [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                            Very very cute.

                            [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

                            You should look into what he is talking about. You really seem to be attached to modern perspectives on culture and race. It might benefit you to understand his worldview.

                            [–][deleted]  (9 children)

                            [deleted]

                              [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

                              You have an idea on racism that didn't always exist. So stop viewing it as good/bad. They are philosophies for looking at life, and most people have racist/prejudiced philosophies if they are really pressed. Some people are more willing to be forthright about it, but that doesn't make it "bad". It's bad when you hurt people, and Horrux ain't hurting anyone with his words. It's not good racism vs bad racism that he's talking about. If the word racist meant something different than it does now, then a new word should be found for either the old thing or the new thing. He's saying the definition changed somewhere along the way, the philosophy morphed. You are basically saying it never changed, and he's just saying that his form of racism is good. That's just silly and lazy, but thanks for being willing to learn new things.

                              [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

                              Do you support Black rule in South Africa/Zimbabwe?

                              [–][deleted]  (3 children)

                              [deleted]

                                [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                                Why don't the Germans have a right to self determination within their own homeland?

                                [–][deleted]  (1 child)

                                [deleted]

                                  [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                                  You tell me. Is it "black supremacy" when Bantu South Africans decide that they no longer wish to be ruled by a wealthy minority of racial foreigners?

                                  [–]SilverSlippers 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                                  Benjamin Boyce posted a really good interview with a mother who had a similar story, its still up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-yLVLvs_do&list=PLRdayXEOwuMH3f0pmZqVQUU62rgJIzvt9&index=13

                                  [–]filbs111 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                                  Put it on LBRY

                                  [–]SaidOverRed 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                                  Or Bitchute. Or Patreon. LBRY is crypto-like, bitchute is torrent-like and Patreon is centralized.

                                  [–]Canbot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                                  [–]ThePlague 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                                  IMO, one of the better operational definitions of "cult" is "a religion with no political or social power". By that definition, transgender isn't a cult. Rather, it's a religion with power that rivals the Catholic Church of the Spanish Inquisition era.

                                  [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                                  Eppur si muove

                                  [–]Prism 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                                  Lol imagine actually having a Zuckerberg account to even be able to see this post. Post a screenshot next time, not all of us want the Zuck to follow us across the net.

                                  [–]Cass 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

                                  First they came for Leafy and we didn't say anything...

                                  [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                                  Leafy surely wasn't the first.

                                  [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                                  Good.

                                  [–]denverkris 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                                  aww, looks like a troll.

                                  [–]adultmanhwa 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                                  smelly tube

                                  [–]ArthnoldManacatsaman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                                  Is there a way of knowing if it was removed by a human moderator or was it auto-removed for being reported a lot of times?