you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]dandeliondynasty 16 insightful - 3 fun16 insightful - 2 fun17 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

This is very helpful, thank you. It has baffled me that conservative friends who see my political positions as sin and infanticide are more willing to hear me out than liberal friends who think I am, at most, guilty of hurting someone’s feelings.

[–]latuspod 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

The liberals think you are literally killing people by denying their identities though. Even though you arent.

[–]Dragonerne 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

No, they don't actually. Leftists say a lot of things but there is no deep thought about it. It's just rationalized anti-white hatred.

They have no issues with saying the most disgusting and vile things about white people and they have no issue denying that white people even exist and they gladly do those two things in the same paragraph.

If they think you are literally killing people by denying their identities, then that should tell you what they think that they themselves are doing when they deny that whites exist.

[–]Honestanonymous 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No they are just making u think its about white hatred its only about accumulating power by any means necessary, read the article

[–]GFIYTFUYDYTRDYESRESR 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

[–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

?

[–]GFIYTFUYDYTRDYESRESR 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

[–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

?

[–]jet199[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well some times they mean literally literally, like when they really believe there's a epidemic of trans killings when actually they are the safest group, but some time they are actually talking about the narcissistic collapse they have when someone questions their world view. Their nice/woke/queer persona can disappear in an instance if questioned (because there's nothing real to hold it up) which feels like a death to them.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

You are talking about abortion yes? I am curious though, do you think abortion can be done for any reason at any stage of pregnancy? Do Radical feminists in general support abortion at any stage for any reason?

[–]jet199[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Different person.

I don't support it at every stage. I think any reason up until 13 weeks then you need a reason, but that can be distress rather than illness. It depends on what country you are from. Most rad fems from countries where they have a religious right trying to outlaw all abortion are extremist on having the right to course choose at any stage because they have to be. If they give an inch they lose it all. Those of us from counties where you can have a civil debate are more nuanced.

This Rad fems need to look at the whole issue and abortion can be used to control women as well as giving them choice. Many young mother's are told its their fault if their schools or employers discriminate against them as they could have just had an abortion. That's not a real free choice, that's just moving the judgement of whether a woman should be allowed keep a pregnancy or not from doctors to snobs and misogynists. Then you have the whole horrible issue of abusers coercing their victims to have abortions they don't want.

The main thing is that the mother's life and health (including mental health) is paramount throughout pregnancy. In some counties women are dragged into surgery against their will because doctors value the pregnancy over the woman or women are allowed to die because available treatment would hurt the fetus (which then usually dies with the mother anyway). Those things are not right and it's a pretty simple fix in law and medicine to prioritise the born over the unborn.

[–]yishengqingwa666 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You don't know what you're talking about. Ask radfems instead of making up lies. We have been working these issues for hundreds of years before you were even born.

https://radicalhubarchives.wordpress.com/radfem-101/

https://radicalhubarchives.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/global-population-to-reach-7-billion/

[–]jet199[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your links don't work.

Also radical feminism started in the 1960s so your comment dosen't make any sense either.

[–]yishengqingwa666 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes. Women get 100% body sovereignty.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Even in the latest stage of pregnancy when the baby is 100% healthy and is viable to live outside the womb?