BREAKING: Twitter Censors Trump By Completely Removing His Tweets For First Time - The Donald - America First

submitted by christnmusicreleases from (thedonald.win)

all 77 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Chipit 29 insightful - 4 fun29 insightful - 3 fun30 insightful - 4 fun -  (9 children)

Yup. They're gonna find a reason to censor him before the election. See if he can get a word in edgewise without social media. If you thought the media was bleating in unision for Hillary in 2016 (they were), it's gonna be a deafening roar in favor of Creepy Child-Sniffing Joe Biden.

[–]JasonCarswell 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

I don't like Trump or Biden in the least, but I'm confident Trump will remain POTUS.

[–]Dragonerne 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

There is zero chance Trump remains POTUS. Absolutely zero.

This is such a cope.

[–]jamesK_3rd 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I think your dead on. They made him out to be the villain, and what's worse is that he believes the lies they sell the American people..

They got perfect contagion, terrifying but not really serious.. I mean if you're under 15, you're more likely to die by falling off a ladder. Perfect for reshaping society.

He's bought into it. Instead of coming out and saying this is all nonsense, he repeats mantras given to the masses by the MSM.. Then he word vomits all kinds of nonsense they tell him, such as masks save lives, the lockdown helps, and the biggest one, he has saved millions of lives because if his actions.

Cities are burning from "peaceful protests" a massive amount of businesses aren't coming back, the people are primed for socialism and the economic fallout from all this might be the catalyst.

But more than anything, they wanna blame someone. A lot of ppl now believe that if Trump is gone things will return to normal. They're wrong.

[–]whistlepig 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I'm constantly struggling to decide how stupid people really are. I didn't expect to see people drop the 1st amendment without a second thought these last several months. But I didn't expect Trump to win the previous election.

Whatever happens... I'll probably be surprised. ;]

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CzzmJdJbYs

[–]Tom_Bombadil 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Yep.

Israel loves that guy.

[–]Seahorse 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yep.

And TRAs have a huge impact on it. I wish the left would distance themselves from this bullshit.

Also Biden has no personality. Both of them suck.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    And then hopefully Darth will strike him down then turn to the light side.

    [–]christnmusicreleases[S] 26 insightful - 4 fun26 insightful - 3 fun27 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

    PUBLISHER NOT PLATFORM

    [–]oneinchterror 14 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 4 fun -  (18 children)

    And he'll continue being an impotent little bitch who does absolutely nothing about it.

    [–]Waxsimulacra 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    Seriously, this should tell you where he really stands.

    [–]oneinchterror 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

    I'm convinced he doesn't even want to win reelection at this point.

    [–]Waxsimulacra 9 insightful - 6 fun9 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 6 fun -  (2 children)

    The fact that Dems are trodding out a mentally retarded pedophile who says shit that would make your grandma cringe should tell you that the whole thing is a farce. Left vs right doesn't matter. We keep playing the game either way.

    [–]book-of-saturday 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

    The man can barely put one sentence together at this point. Best evidence of how rotten the system is.

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    My retarded pedophile is totally gonna win the debate against your retarded pedophile!

    [–]FediNetizen 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (12 children)

    There's not much he can do about it. Twitter is a private platform that can set their own standards. Also, forcing them to keep it up would be a blatant 1st Amendment violation. Part of free speech includes the right not to speak.

    I've heard the arguments that Twitter should be considered a public utility, but I don't think you can make a convincing case. The Fediverse is a viable and growing alternative to Twitter. So is Gab, and Parler.

    So what exactly do you think he's supposed to do about it?

    [–]JasonCarswell 20 insightful - 3 fun20 insightful - 2 fun21 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    Twitter is not private though they claim to be.

    In-Q-Tel, the tech wing of the CIA, among other government fronts are heavily invested in and control all the "mainstream" centralized platforms (Google, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Wikipedia, etc). Taxpayer dollars have gone into these giants and therefor if fairness and justice prevailed, we'd have some democratic say in the matter. Of course we know the corporatocracy is completely corrupt and 2020 has illustrated their desperate measures to maintain full spectrum dominance.

    There is a reason why they never talk about any other sites in the MSM - because the corporatocracy doesn't fully control nor wish to promote them.

    I am in support of the Fediverse (and to /s/DecentralizeAllThings), though I have yet to actually embrace it. (SaidIt is now federated.) I'm not a fan of the Mastodon thing because I haven't had use for it nor bothered to learn it. Maybe there's a way for SaidIt to incorporate it like the chat somehow.

    For more decentralization options: /s/DecentralizeAllThings/wiki

    [–]FediNetizen 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Dude twitter is a publicly traded company. But hey, use the title font instead of the bold font and maybe if you wish for it really hard you can override facts you don't like.

    [–]JasonCarswell 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I should have been clearer - all those platforms have been heavily funded in part by the public. Those are the facts.

    [–]MrZak 14 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

    The private platform thing is ridiculous though when money is monopolized, A few weeks ago a patreon competitor called newproject2 had to shut down, its creator made the site to have a backup for his own patreon and also to offer a place for people who got banned from patreon but were not breaking any laws to go to process payments.

    First the banks cancelled his payment processing for no reason and cited TOS violation as the reason.

    So he found a new bank to do payments with and instead he was added to the MATCH list which is a global blacklist for financial crimes, we was unable to get a reason for why he was added and there is no way to get removed from this list.

    So yeah good luck ever trying to start an alternative to these "private companies"

    [–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    This is sad but profoundly important news. Has it been posted? This illustrates the stranglehold of the corporatocracy and their banksters.

    [–]MrZak 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Heres a video he made about it. https://youtu.be/SfBorgoYQa4

    [–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Great stuff! Thanks! And thanks for introducing me to The Dick Show.

    /s/DecentralizeAllThings/comments/5re1/patreon_alternative_new_project_2_banned_by/

    [–]Trajan 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    It’s this recurring issue that leads me to believe that going after 230 is the wrong way to go. Ending or modifying 230 would be incredibly risky. If the protection for hosts goes away, the only people able to risk allowing user-generated content are those with the deepest pockets. Big social media will effectively be The Internet.

    Tackling political posturing by banks and payment processors seems a better way to go. People should not be denied banking and other financial services when doing nothing illegal, and these businesses are not being asked to host or endorse content.

    [–]Nightjar 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

    "There's not much he can do about it."

    Step 1 - Open an account on Gab.

    Step 2 - Post on Twitter to his 83 million followers "Too much political censorship on Twitter. From now on I will be posting on gab.com/donaldtrump, follow me there."

    Step 3 - The rest of the Republicans follow suit.

    Step 4 - Tens of millions of conservatives open Gab accounts and stop using Twitter. Daily Active Users (DAU) plummet.

    Step 5 - Twitter stock drops 40% within 1 month.

    Step 6 - Jack Dorsey and all top executives responsible for cancel culture are fired by shareholders.

    Step 7 - New CEO is appointed, declares Twitter will be a 1st amendment platform, all legal content will be allowed.

    [–]FediNetizen 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Look, I hate Twitter and would love to see them fail because they let their woke politics get in the way of running the site, but that scenario wouldn't play out the way you think it would.

    If Trump declared a switch to Gab, and people followed there, Gab would completely crash from the overwhelming traffic, and more importantly Gab couldn't do anything to fix it in time. Their site runs a derivative of Mastodon, which cannot scale to meet the demands of a site anywhere near the size of Twitter. It's not something they could fix with more servers, either; the codebase just can't handle the insane amounts of users that would occupy a site anywhere near the size of Twitter.

    So then Trump would have announced his move to a new site which is now unusable, and he can't connect with his followers as a result. His options now are to go back to Twitter "temporarily" where's he's now lost face because he said he was leaving prematurely, or be unable to communicate with his followers while he waits for Gab to try to build a new site that can actually scale, which would take them months.

    Put simply, the scenario you've laid out would be a disaster.

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    If true it's time for Gab and the federation to hope for the best, prepare for the worst and have a scale up contingency plan.

    [–]Nightjar 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Even if Gab crashed, all the headlines would still be "Trump leaves Twitter and moves to Gab. Millions of followers leaving Twitter for Gab are crashing site." This headline would still cause Twitter's stock to collapse and result in the firing of Dorsey within a few days. The new temporary CEO would reach out to Trump saying they will stop censoring politicians, and Trump could come back to Twitter in a few days.

    [–]JasonCarswell 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    Rage bait.

    The ruling class' corporatocracy-technocracy is purposely dividing us to distract us all from their intentionally economic collapse. While those of us who can afford to bitch about this presently, millions of poor folks are now being critically fucked over - along with our future prosperity.

    [–]Hadza 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    It gets darker before the dawn

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    It's getting close to midnight. This is only the beginning of the storm. It's going to get much much much much much darker. Many won't survive the night.

    [–]whistlepig 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    not just the poor... but also the future poor....

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Indeed!

    [–]kokolokoNightcrawler 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

    Good, go cry moar on the waling wall

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [removed]

      [–]JasonCarswell 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Low tier.

      [–]justcool393 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (21 children)

      side note related to the users in the thread:

      why do people actually want Section 230 removed? like... that'd make every site owner liable for anyone some idiot says on there. if some guy threatens to shoot up a place or something on <your favorite website here that has a commenting feature>, the site owner shouldn't be liable for that stuff.

      removing section 230 protections would basically require either

      a) multitudes of whole websites to shut down completely, especially those in which controversial viewpoints are discussed, which is way more egregious censorship than Twitter trendbanning some people.

      b) every piece of content to be humanly moderated and the operator would have to be absolutely perfect at it. as an example, I don't want saidit taken offline because someone posted or commented something libelous or someone issued a threat of violence or something.

      I think Twitter can be eyerollworthy at the times I choose to visit but I don't want this to happen. because the day that Twitter is declared a "publisher" is the day that Trump and pretty much everyone that has any bit of controversy at all are kicked off.

      [–]flugegeheimen 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      that'd make every site owner liable for anyone some idiot says on there.

      And they should be liable IF they already engage in censoring on their own. The whole "I'm just a provider of a platform, I can't be blamed for anything" only makes sense when you are just a provider and nothing else. As soon as you unilaterally start to decide what content is allowed and not allowed, it's kind of hard to argue that you can't be held accountable for whatever content you allow.

      [–]christnmusicreleases[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

      Hence why we need to nationalize Big Tech.

      [–]justcool393 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      I have a few points to respond to with this

      1. what qualifies as "Big Tech?" I assume most people would agree Facebook and Twitter are included, but reddit? Discord? saidit? some random person's forum? what about a wordpress blog? sites and services rise and die all the time, etc, so what about these?

      2. why should someone be compelled to host your speech? we are provided with a platform to speak our mind, but just like in real life, if someone's causing trouble and I have the right to tell people to leave, it's my right to tell them to do so. I'd be more convinced if a site like saidit, which has over 250,000 posts and 1,000,000 comments so far couldn't be hosted for $50/month. there are also plenty of free web hosts if you're into that, or you can host off your computer directly.

      3. content moderation can be pretty difficult to do at scale and it isn't a solved problem. you have people posting outright spam which, which is a cat and mouse game of itself (for example reddit has better spam filters than Facebook or Twitter, and reddit's spam filters are notoriously fickle and annoying to deal with at times. but you also have outside agents from whereever. even just enforcing the bare minimum of rules is downright impossible in many instances. how could something like this be enforced fairly, especially when it comes to political speech?

      [–]christnmusicreleases[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      Question 1:

      1. Google 2. Apple 3. Microsoft 4. Facebook 5. Twitter 6. Paypal 7. Instagram 8. YouTube 9. Vimeo 10. Linkedin

      And maybe some of the major image hosting companies like Flickr and Imgur. Also you have to consider CDNs and large hosting platforms. I think this could be quantified very easily by an industry study.

      Question 2:

      Nobody is compelled to host anything, but if they operate as a platform, they must not censor your speech. If they want to be a publisher, they must be liable for the content. If it's a platform then the person posting it is legally liable for it. There is no middle ground here.

      Question 3:

      So that is why you make them public utilities. Spam is easily downvoted and detectable by algorithms. Political speech is very different.

      [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

      LOL

      Big Brother already has it's claws covertly controlling Big Tech.

      Welcome to the /s/Surveillance /s/Corporatocracy and their /s/Agenda21_Agenda2030 /s/Illusions and /s/PsyOps.

      [–]christnmusicreleases[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

      Agreed, but deep state.

      [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

      It's all connected.

      [–]christnmusicreleases[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

      Search "Operation Lockstep"

      [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

      I've been posting on it:
      /s/Coronavirus/comments/3zj0/lock_step_2010_rockefeller_foundation_paper_laid/
      /s/Coronavirus/comments/3ziw/the_lock_step_scenario_rockefeller_reports/
      /s/Coronavirus/comments/3ziu/lock_step_this_is_no_futuristic_scenario_panic/
      /s/Coronavirus/comments/46kq/rockefeller_blue_print_for_police_state_triggered/
      /s/Unrest/comments/4p8b/final_technocratic_lock_step_plan_is_here_as/

      [–]christnmusicreleases[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

      Thank you for this. I discovered about Operation Lock Step via Trunews, a show I generally watch. Here is the episode: https://www.trunews.com/stream/economic-lockdown-is-the-club-of-rome-imposing-limits-to-growth

      [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

      Thanks for that. You should post it (add the 2020-05-19 date too) if you haven't already.

      There's a few more not from me: https://saidit.net/s/censorship/search?q=lock+step

      Also, more than in just /s/Coronavirus is /s/911truth, /s/Bill_Gates_is_Evil, /s/Billionaires, /s/ClimateSkeptics, /s/Coronavirus, /s/CorruptScience, /s/Gaslighting, /s/Illusions, /s/LockdownSkepticism, /s/OpenScience_Scientism, /s/PsyOps, /s/pushback, /s/Unrest, /s/VaccineSkepticism.

      [–]christnmusicreleases[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      I'm glad I'm not the only one posting about this collusion. Thank God.

      [–]Dragonerne 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      230 needs to go so social media gets completely destroyed.

      [–]Overdrive 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Twitter is already kicking people off for minute amounts of controversy and very little of anything to do with "hate speech". The banning is happening, and I think it's wrong to call them a platform. I understand that maybe we need to do something else besides abolish 230. Is it possible for companies to self elect the protections that they receive and to enforce their decisions onto them?

      Saidit obviously deserves those protections, and many other sites. They deserve them because of their actions. They don't ban people based on beliefs or even faulty news/evidence. I see the problem with getting rid of it, I'm interested in reading from people any ideas.

      [–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      They need to clarify the distinctions between administrating, moderating, editing, and censoring content, and to maybe add more than just the binary platform or publisher criteria for the new digital age (a few decades old).

      One of Lionel's Laws applies: The laws always lag behind the technology. I'd add, intentionally so.

      Just like their terms of service are ambiguous and always shifting, they don't really want an authentic solution to keep them responsible and legit.

      [–]Trajan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

      This is a post that should be read by anybody thinking that messing with 230 is the solution. 230 is why sites like Saidit are feasible to operate in the US. Does anybody seriously believe that either party would modify 230 to favour freedom of expression? No, it’ll be geared towards corporate and governmental interests.

      [–]One_Jack_Move 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      I'm totally willing to sacrifice Saidit if it means more freedom of expression on the net. But I agree, the politicians aren't going to do shit.

      [–]Trajan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      I’m afraid we’d see far less freedom of expression. Everybody who operates a site would be liable for comments and content posed by users. Only companies with deep pockets and the ability to screen would be feasible. It’d be as if the entire Internet were a particularly censorious AOL.

      230 is the best thing that ever happened to the Internet.

      [–]One_Jack_Move 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Couldn't websites just not censor content at all? Except for illegal stuff of course.

      [–]Trajan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      The situation on illegal acts won’t really change. Sites like Facebook are liable if they don’t take reasonable steps to prevent criminal activity. The difference is that without 230 there is no inherent protection against civil suits. If you libel somebody on Facebook then it would be as if they were a publisher. The same would apply to sites like Saidit, Kiwi Farms, or BitChute.

      As much as I despise social media, I don’t need to use them or care about what they do. I have alternatives. I’d like to keep them.

      [–]SeasideLimbs 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      why do people actually want Section 230 removed?

      Because people are retarded. You have people in this thread calling Trump a jewish puppet. Some people will always be retards.

      Section 230 needs to be more specific, have less exceptions in which platforms are allowed to intervene without being declared publishers, and needs to actually be enforced strictly. That's literally it. That's a perfect solution that would allow for such large, centralized services to keep existing while preventing them from blatantly enforcing their biases.

      [–]NaughtyUnicorn 5 insightful - 6 fun5 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

      Trump should join Saidit.

      [–]Dr_Bukkake 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

      Shocking! Almost like this was the plan all along the closer we got to the election.

      [–]bagano1 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

      To be fair, some of those posts were seriously dumb. Sometimes, this guy is on point, other times, goddamn, he's stupid.

      If you're one of those idiots that thinks you have to agree with everything he says, save the post and don't respond. It don't work like that.

      [–]christnmusicreleases[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      He's no idiot. He's not perfect. You're clearly not capable of judging him.

      [–]mongre 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      To be fair...

      Goes on to completely miss the point. Your opinion of someone's speech doesn't matter. It the right they have to speak it that's under threat.

      To go on, you may not like his policy but you're either appalled that a public forum censored a standing president or you're you're far more stupid than you think trump is.

      [–]censorship 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      This is fucking stupid. reasons I hate most media forms

      [–]suckitreddit 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      Trump! Go to Gab for fucksakes. Fuck Twitter.

      [–]H3v8 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

      I wonder why Trump doesn't give a strong message by opening an account elsewhere, on Gab and Saidit and perhaps other platforms. The more people adhere to platforms like Twitter, the more power in Twitter's hands.

      [–]christnmusicreleases[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      It's the principle of the matter. Why should he have to? He's an American, he's the president, for goodness' sake!

      [–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      Trump is a Rorschach test.

      You see in him what you want to see. A hero, a villain, a puppet, a racist, a maverick, a pawn, a Zionist, a White Nationalist, an Orange Man, a reptile, a boy in a bubble, a turd with hair plugs.

      [–]volvo 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

      Good. They should ban this moron while we're at it, would make the world a better place

      [–]christnmusicreleases[S] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      No, they should deplatform big tech.

      [–]bobbobbybob 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

      are you referring to yourself? "this moron" has that kind of feel about it

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

      it was his retarded son

      [–]christnmusicreleases[S] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

      No, Trump's tweets were also censored, and his son is not mentally deficient, he's just not a left wing extremist like you.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

      i'm far right and don't like trump cuz he does jack shit, him and all the q tards like you are retards

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Wow imagine thinking kushner isn't a flaming pile of sociopathic dogshit, you must be one miserable fuck

      [–]KKKTranny 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Donnie, this is your chance to join a far right twitter clone and blow it up in size.