use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~4 users here now
Applied for job, got 351 page report of LIKED tweets
submitted 3 years ago by [deleted] from ganker.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]72ndGender 22 insightful - 5 fun22 insightful - 4 fun23 insightful - 4 fun23 insightful - 5 fun - 3 years ago* (7 children)
A good reminder to keep personal social media accounts that you use twice a year, and have your actual account be completely anonymous.
[–][deleted] 18 insightful - 3 fun18 insightful - 2 fun19 insightful - 2 fun19 insightful - 3 fun - 3 years ago (6 children)
Or just avoid the corporate slave jobs that pull this shit altogether.
[–]72ndGender 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun - 3 years ago (5 children)
I would usually agree, but I just learned about the unwoke platform where employers don't use SJW standards for hiring. I'm guessing they won't cyberstalk applicants for offensive thoughts. But these are probably the smaller corporations, not the megacorps.
[–]bagano1 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun - 3 years ago (4 children)
I stopped caring. I got shit on my criminal record, no convictions, just a bad joke I made on a board, lol, but there still is evidence of the encounter, I wrote un-PC letters to the paper, high school classmates didn't like me, had some falling out with bosses in my current line of work, but if it ever comes up, I don't care. Best thing I ever learned was how to walk out the door. Parents never taught me that, learned it myself. It does pay.
[–]yayblueberries 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
Same but I never cared. In the sense that I finally deleted almost all of my social media accounts where the advice these days is to have them because jobs want to see that you have them. Screw that, why do I need to be FORCED to have social media accounts so I can get hired?!
It never hurt me, I found a great job in December. What hurt me was these cowardly crybabies who would keep fake social media accounts demanding all "non-essential" businesses close. I worked at a non-profit making okay money, but non-profits are notorious for always being in the red or having to float funds because governments are measly with them. So the job is permanently gone. But I got it despite not playing the social media game.
[–]72ndGender 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (2 children)
Sounds like you would be best off starting your own business or bleeding the welfare system dry.
[–]bagano1 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (1 child)
No, I work and am actually well-known for being reliable and most importantly, sane on the job. I actually tend to find that if you start off in any organization with an DGAF attitude, they are afraid to get on your *** as much. Works well with women too.
[–]72ndGender 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
That's good to hear. And IDGAF is a solid tactic for most of our interactions with people. They can't control you as easily.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]72ndGender 22 insightful - 5 fun22 insightful - 4 fun23 insightful - 4 fun23 insightful - 5 fun - (7 children)
[–][deleted] 18 insightful - 3 fun18 insightful - 2 fun19 insightful - 2 fun19 insightful - 3 fun - (6 children)
[–]72ndGender 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun - (5 children)
[–]bagano1 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun - (4 children)
[–]yayblueberries 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun - (0 children)
[–]72ndGender 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]bagano1 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]72ndGender 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)