all 15 comments

[–]Tom_Bombadil 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Click bait title as always from Chipit the known shill.

The study was conducted exclusively along the portrail of low status groups. It's says nothing about broad liberal views on censorship.

It's a study about a well known fact.

If you're a SJW then you generally support SJW issues, and would like less coverage that discredits your expressed general position.

Nobody likes info that conflicts with their world view.

Everybody would prefer to see evidence that supports their world view.

Please let me know if a population exists that this inherent fact does not apply to.

More low-brow research from the folks that send Chipit material to post.

The abstract and "results" couldn't be less objective.

Recent work has suggested that Liberals have sacred values about protecting low status groups and thus are particularly prone to bias against any information that portrays those groups unfavorably. In a preregistered study (n = 559), we tested whether Liberals would support more censorship of information that portrays low status groups unfavorably (that men evolved to be better leaders than women, that Islam is violent and incites terrorism, and that white people score higher on intelligence tests than black people) than similar information that portrays high status groups unfavorably (that women evolved to be better leaders than men, that Christianity is violent and incites terrorism, and that black people score higher on intelligence tests than white people). The results very clearly supported predictions. Liberals consistently displayed double standards in their censorship preferences such that they desired to censor information that portrays low status groups unfavorably more than information that portrays high status groups unfavorably. Moderates and Conservatives supported more similar levels of censorship regardless of whether the information was favorable toward relatively high or low status groups, but Conservatives did display a small preference for censoring Christian violence over Islamic violence. Exploratory analyses also revealed that Millennials might be slightly more in support of censorship than Generation X in general, but Baby Boomers’ censorship support generally fell between that of Generation X and Millennials.

I agree that SJWs are idiots.

However, this research is clickbait propaganda.

[–]Captzapheart 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Warning; Genrally a study is part of a report, there are many studies compiled into a report, therefore studies are an incomplete picture, not untruthful but nearly alway incomplete.

[–]RickC-137 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Nice snope tactic - trying to discredit something without any proof or substance. "something something something. False"

[–]rightykiller 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

loser

[–]RickC-137 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

haha...does your butt hurt? report me to reddit mods

[–]rightykiller 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

ill report you to ICE

[–]RickC-137 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

if you only knew the irony. TTYL.

[–]Captzapheart 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There is no link.....lol, I call BULLSHIT.

[–]RickC-137 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

All the info is there. Better than anonymous sources familiar with the matter.

[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Uh...why is it that you do not address any of the very valid points raised?

Instead you attempt to discredit the scientists? What's wrong with you? Why do you hate science?

[–]Captzapheart 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

what valid point, what science ...there's no link? I think you'er a misled simpleton, please convey my condolences to your mother.

[–]RuckFeddit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

OK so complete it. Review the studies and get back to us. We're clearly mentally incapable as you felt the need to warn us before reading.

[–]RickC-137 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I'd put gay men in that group also.

[–]RuckFeddit 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You don't have permission to access "http://www.wqad.com/2019/10/03/new-study-concludes-women-and-liberals-more-likely-to-support-censorship-hold-double-standards/" on this server. Reference #18.47f57a5c.1585930843.39e28905

Can someone archive it and link?

[–]eladmiral 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We need more studies like this. Please think for yourself no matter what age/sex you are. There are people every day in the news trying to silence others.