you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Rioting does not seem to be the best option after your neighborhood is burned down and the message you rioted for, ended up harming the wrong people.

Also, to touch on a sensitive topic and perspectives of maliciousness; when segments of the African American population rioted against perceived maltreatment; many people denigrated it (using their internet words) as a "chimp-out", as opposed to- fighting for their rights against abusers. And of-course, the supremacist state would always perceive counter actions that seek to do damage as needing "corrections" while further clamping down on individual liberties and possibly implement martial law for their own benefit.

So if you wanted chaos in the neighborhoods, people being harmed of their livelihoods and the military to get involved in possibly human rights violations; then continue. But if you do continue in the calls for violence, then you may also be an advocate or agent provocateur of CIA proportions!

Make your pick but the real question is: Is the CIA involved on saidit?probablyyes

[–]FormosaOolong 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dude, it was a turn of phrase. In no way was I or will I ever call for violence. Geez.