you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]AnarchySpeach 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

They're not even hiding their intentions.

Their lack of shame is amazing.

[–]FormosaOolong 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Why America is not rioting in the streets for this and countless other bald-faced abuses is beyond me.

[–]AnarchySpeach 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Twitter and Facebook control the mindless outrage of the public. They're not against this, so there's no call to action.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Technology has outpaced lawmaking. Social media has become incredibly important to political discourse. I just hope these tech monopolies will be held accountable in the future for interfering in politics.

[–]black_hole_son 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed the way the GoP and Trump have treated honest hard working Americans is fucking disgusting!

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Stockholm syndrome maybe.

[–]FormosaOolong 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Stockholm syndrome maybe

[–]dittendatt 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because they have very successfully struck down any attempts at organization.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Rioting does not seem to be the best option after your neighborhood is burned down and the message you rioted for, ended up harming the wrong people.

Also, to touch on a sensitive topic and perspectives of maliciousness; when segments of the African American population rioted against perceived maltreatment; many people denigrated it (using their internet words) as a "chimp-out", as opposed to- fighting for their rights against abusers. And of-course, the supremacist state would always perceive counter actions that seek to do damage as needing "corrections" while further clamping down on individual liberties and possibly implement martial law for their own benefit.

So if you wanted chaos in the neighborhoods, people being harmed of their livelihoods and the military to get involved in possibly human rights violations; then continue. But if you do continue in the calls for violence, then you may also be an advocate or agent provocateur of CIA proportions!

Make your pick but the real question is: Is the CIA involved on saidit?probablyyes

[–]FormosaOolong 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dude, it was a turn of phrase. In no way was I or will I ever call for violence. Geez.