STUNNING! YouTube Takes Down Judicial Watch and Right Side Broadcasting's Impeachment Feed -- Want to Drive Viewers to Liberal Media Feeds!

submitted by useless_aether from thegatewaypundit.com

all 19 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]AnarchySpeach 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

They're not even hiding their intentions.

Their lack of shame is amazing.

[–]FormosaOolong 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Why America is not rioting in the streets for this and countless other bald-faced abuses is beyond me.

[–]AnarchySpeach 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Twitter and Facebook control the mindless outrage of the public. They're not against this, so there's no call to action.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Technology has outpaced lawmaking. Social media has become incredibly important to political discourse. I just hope these tech monopolies will be held accountable in the future for interfering in politics.

[–]black_hole_son 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed the way the GoP and Trump have treated honest hard working Americans is fucking disgusting!

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Stockholm syndrome maybe.

[–]FormosaOolong 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Stockholm syndrome maybe

[–]dittendatt 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because they have very successfully struck down any attempts at organization.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Rioting does not seem to be the best option after your neighborhood is burned down and the message you rioted for, ended up harming the wrong people.

Also, to touch on a sensitive topic and perspectives of maliciousness; when segments of the African American population rioted against perceived maltreatment; many people denigrated it (using their internet words) as a "chimp-out", as opposed to- fighting for their rights against abusers. And of-course, the supremacist state would always perceive counter actions that seek to do damage as needing "corrections" while further clamping down on individual liberties and possibly implement martial law for their own benefit.

So if you wanted chaos in the neighborhoods, people being harmed of their livelihoods and the military to get involved in possibly human rights violations; then continue. But if you do continue in the calls for violence, then you may also be an advocate or agent provocateur of CIA proportions!

Make your pick but the real question is: Is the CIA involved on saidit?probablyyes

[–]FormosaOolong 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dude, it was a turn of phrase. In no way was I or will I ever call for violence. Geez.

[–]FormosaOolong 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

How is this a Thing? WHat the hell is wrong with these asshats trying to control--and manufacture--the narrative!?!?

[–]steaknpotatoes 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

They should be ruled as a public forum, they should have to be neutral on free speech. It's wrong to allow biased corporations to control our speech.

[–]fruitjack 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

that's right, the state needs to seize the means of production!!! y'all are so pro capitalism until it's suddenly inconvenient. don't like the policies? don't use the platform. 'nuff said.

[–]steaknpotatoes 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Who's "yall"? You don't know me or the people that agree with my position on this. The all or nothing crap is a really stupid approach from both sides and this is the perfect issue to show them both as hypocrites, they essentially switched sides on this issue. I would bet you wouldn't take the same "don't like the policies? don't use the platform" approach when it comes to restaurants or bakeries denying people for their sexuality or race, or how about net neutrality? Do you think drug companies, hospitals, EMTs should be allowed implement a conservatives only policy?

I've always believed in a well regulated market to prevent abuses, to protect our constitutional rights, to provide choice etc Monopolies, duopolies, and other captured markets of importance need regulating, and Youtube is essentially a major public forum.

Oh damn I just looked at your profile and you're one of those "everyone not on the far left is a nazi REEEEE" morons, seek help

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

That's a good thing.

[–]fruitjack 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

take them all down. nothing of value was lost!

[–]Penelope 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

If you can't win against their arguments, silence them?

[–]fruitjack 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

deplatform the fuckers. they can go be nazis in the local gutter where they belong!

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Not an argument. Stick to pyramid of debate.