New Study Says Porn Is Good For You

submitted by TruthTeller from (youtube.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SeasideLimbs 10 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

Why are mainstream leftists always so obsessed with sexual perversion and harmful porn addiction?

[–]TruthTeller[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Why are right wingers so obsessed with controlling others' sexuality and what they do with their private lives? Why do Right Wingers see any kind of sexual expression as perversion and addiction? Why? Oh Why!?

[–]SeasideLimbs 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

I don't know, ask a right-winger. Or a mainstream leftist for that matter, given how much TRAs love to dictate especially homosexual people's private lives, up to and including wanting to force lesbian women to be penetrated by penises. Pretty sick. Also idk how right-wingers think but I'm pretty sure if they saw "any kind of sexual expression as perversion" they wouldn't be having children - something they statistically do more often than left-wingers. They do have one over on left-wingers though in that they do make a logical distinction between sexuality and fetishes.

[–]TruthTeller[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Oh! Having Children! How Noble of You!

How dare anyone have sex without the goal of having children. So that is your beef huh?

WOW! Right wingers are on a higher plane: they make a "logical distinction between sexuality and fetishes."

It's just so "logical" see? Anyone can see the difference between "sexuality" and "fetishes". How dare anyone have "fetishes"?

Have children instead.

Fuck you and your Christian-Fairy Tale Morality.

[–]SeasideLimbs 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Oh! Having Children! How Noble of You!

Me? I don't want children and don't have the option.

How dare anyone have sex without the goal of having children. So that is your beef huh?

Do you have any actual arguments or is this entire conversation just going to be you making up things I never said?

WOW! Right wingers are on a higher plane: they make a "logical distinction between sexuality and fetishes."

Well... yeah.

It's just so "logical" see? Anyone can see the difference between "sexuality" and "fetishes". How dare anyone have "fetishes"?

Sure, one example of such people being, you know, psychologists. Paraphilias are a scientific concept. Right-wingers didn't come up with that.

Have children instead.

Or not. I sure don't.

Fuck you and your Christian-Fairy Tale Morality.

Me - an LGBT atheist - and my evil christian fairy tale morality. Ok then.

[–]Shinjin_Nana 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

"Fuck you and your Christian-Fairy Tale Morality." "Me - an LGBT atheist - and my evil christian fairy tale morality. Ok then."

Right? I'm an asexual atheist - you don't have to be a christian to see the evils of porn use. Understanding the dangers to trafficked women and children and the deleterious effect it has on men isn't a religious position.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But it seems you do have to be a man to have that kind of cognitive dissonance whenever someone questions your use of something demonstrably harmful to women and children.