"All the links go to their petition or to their donation pages." You're conveniently ignoring the link that clearly has "sources" in front of it. It even tells you what section to scroll to.

"Many of the commentators"? I've scrolled through a whole bunch of them. Most were supportive. So far I've found only two who both weren't supportive and actually had some arguments to back themselves up. One of them never proved any of the stories false, just questioned the sources of the video, the other only talked about one of the stories and didn't prove that one false, either. That said, as an atheist, I'm honestly not a particular fan of the Christian element (like the praying) either, but that doesn't prove all that they say wrong. Other groups fight against the same thing too, most notably being the people who formerly worked in the industry.

If PornHub is hosting these videos, then it is certainly their responsibility to monitor whether the content of their own site is legal or not. They don't even have any age verification systems in place.

These are apparently petitions to raise hysteria, yet I've remained calm in this discussion and you've been the one with the emotional ad hominem attacks. Do you mean to say that these petitions raise hysteria in pro pornography people like yourself?

Regarding your last statements: there has often been a need for large groups of people to join together to have their voices heard. Petitions are one way to do that. As long as there is profit to be made, evidence is often not enough. I'd prefer to live in the just world that you're painting in your comment there, but we simply don't.