all 3 comments

[–]sawboss 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That's stupid question. Of course the answer is "YES", Betteridge's law not withstanding.

[–]hennaojisan 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I agree that they should be allowed to speak freely unless they are calling for the death of a person or persons or an ethnic group. The term Neo-Nazi itself is subjective when we consider the possibility that Zionists may have backed Nazis before and during WWII.

[–]sawboss 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

unless they are calling for the death of a person or persons or an ethnic group

Now consider what that means in a political context where "mis-gendering" is equated to "denial of existence" and therefore "death threat".