“Today a reader, tomorrow a leader.” – Margaret Fuller

submitted by Tiwaking from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Yes, by Edmond Paris, a liar who didn't footnote this claim. Translate this section:

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernhard_Stempfle

For some reason english wikipedia prevents editors from puting these sections in. It is in German.

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

you forgot to supply evidence supporting your claim paris being a liar

edit: if you take a quick look, you will see there are other sources listed, Karl Dietrich Bracher, Konrad Heiden etc so you can't dismiss it until it is proven they are all wrong.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Did you read my evidence?

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

the german wiki link? it supports my claim.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

How so? You said he wrote Mein Kampf. Provide evidence that Stempfle wrote it in full, othe rthan being an editor, and furthermore, he WAS NOT A JESUIT and renounced Jesuitism well before Hitler came to power.

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

once a jesuit, always a jesuit. and even if writing the m. k. was a team effort, it is still damning enough!

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

But he's NOT A JESUIT at all.

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

i know he was a catholic and that is why i wrote exactly that. but just in case he was secretly still a jesuit or even if not a jesuit, but carrying out jesuit orders, that still means he is a jesuit agent. not a jesuit, but worked for the jesuits. truth will come out.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

but just in case he was secretly still a jesuit or even if not a jesuit, but carrying out jesuit orders, that still means he is a jesuit agent. not a jesuit, but worked for the jesuits. truth will come out.

But no proof suggests that.

And being a former Catholic doesn't mean you're a Jesuit.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I just posted a long comment, hope you read it. The german link does not support your claim at all.