My fascination in the article, is as I've already stated, I've read many threads here, where I read the 'community', or 'a' community here, concerned with the quality of material. I believe I've read several times people worried about being labeled 'voat', or becoming an 'ideological echo chamber'. I know as a new forum, that the quality of said content, or the ability to differentiate content from elsewhere is important.

I also comprehended what the author of the article was trying to convey. Perhaps it's the vectors of information that I like, which allows me to find resonance with the author; in that people lack originality. Have other authors pointed this out? Sure, but at least for myself, it was once again refreshing to see someone write on the subject.

As to your opinion, my only investment is trying to comprehend you, and converse. In this thread, you wrote a disparaging post, 'the article sucked'(warn others from what you thought sucked). I had already read, and had been contemplating for some time before this, what I wanted to write, as I saw merit(didn't think it sucked). What this thread is showing at least between the 2 of us, is 1 approves, 1 doesn't.