you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Trump walks that pro-zionist/anti-zionist line so carefully, it's kind of impressive.

First he's willing to hold talks, doesn't want to close any channels. Seemingly anti-zionist agenda, not feeding in to the Iran-war narrative.

But then right at the end of the article:

“Iran did do it,” Trump told Fox. “It’s essentially got Iran written all over it... I guess they didn’t want the evidence left behind.”

I wonder if this is from his informers. Where is he getting this information.

And I guess there is a very tiny chance it is truly the actions of Iran. However they'd be absolutely suicidal to do something like this, and they know it, and their last 40 years of history shows they know doing something like this is just asking to be invaded and have their government overthrown by the US like it was in 1953. So they wouldn't do this. Just like Assad wouldn't gas his own people. Like they tried to convince us of on 3 separate occasions to justify an invasion in to Syria.

Seems 95% likely to be a false flag. But I find how Trump is walking the line to be interesting. Like "yes, they did it" (which they probably didn't) but then also "I don't care, lets talk about this instead of go to war" (which is NOT what the people making the false flag want, they want a military reaction)

All in all, interesting situation. Probably will turn out to be nothing if cooler heads prevail. I think a lot of people see this as a false flag from a million miles away. People are getting wise to that trick.