you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]cyber_burn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

just another confounding piece of the puzzle.

why didn't the feds investigate the "hack?" crowdstrike saying conflicting things like they don't have hard evidence and the attackers used built in windows tools to evade detection, and yet they are able to place the blame on a specific russian hacking group and assert exactly what they were targeting. interesting article though i'm not exactly sure how credible everything this guy says is - but interesting things to think about. but in crowdstrike's own write up about this, they post the malware used. but i thought they used built in windows tools? they also don't explain how the malware was used. and they claim they know they were searching for opposition research on trump, but i don't believe that was a part of the leaks.

former 30-year nsa employee and whistleblower, bill binney, also claims that the data transfer speed closely matches transfer over usb rather than network data transfer. there's a video where he goes into more detail but i can't remember where - may have been a unity4j interview.

obviously, i have no idea what is actually going on, but i sure would appreciate the truth. and this information the ukrainians are talking about (if they even have any) may be unrelated to the dnc hack, but it's really hard to tell what's going on with all of this. i was actually just reading some things that said the feds did investigate the dnc hack, so i'm not sure about that one - i've heard people say different things.

edit: ah so here it is found a bunch of sources saying the fbi was denied access. that's so fucking weird.