CANADA GOING TYRANNICAL! 2nd "Total" Lockdown; ISOLATION CAMPS for "Refusers"

submitted by PresentableSonInLaw from halturnerradioshow.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Does anyone have experience with this Hal Turner radio show? How reliable is their reporting? Are they prone to fear porn? I am trying to assess how reliable this reporting is. It is obviously a vital matter for those who live there.

[–]NerfgunBump 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

He has a Wikipedia article which could give a basis.

I'm surprised anybody's upvoting this at all. It's seriously just fiction.

[–]slushpilot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It's seriously just fiction

It's seriously not hard to look up from the gc.ca website:

https://buyandsell.gc.ca/procurement-data/tender-notice/PW-ZL-105-38463

Did you even watch the video of the Ontario MLA asking about it?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzWLlfwfD4Y

[–]NerfgunBump 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I did. I read the procurement and watched the video. Did you? Did you notice no between them and what the article is talking about?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is some overlap, but I agree they're not the same thing, and this is why I have to ask how reliable this outlet is. So far, nobody I know has chimed in.

[–]slushpilot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ha, I didn't actually read the article posted here... but I did read the letter from the "Liberal insider" from another source earlier. I don't know what to make of that letter if that's what we're discussing. It sounds like a bit of a nutjob if I'm being honest.

Still, there are valid questions to be discussed surrounding it.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Wait, so Wikipedia is not entirely worthless you say?

Please corroborate that assertion.