The mask is slipping off

submitted by useless_aether from (files.catbox.moe)

all 17 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]AntiLowEffortHuman 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Wtf, I can't understand what energy sources have to do with systems of oppression.

[–]jamesK_3rd 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

People don't go to China and protest their carbon output or their pollution..

People don't go to India and demand cleaner forms of energy for the population to control their CO2 output.

Nobody cares... Instead.. People get on their private jets and come to the US and lambast them for leaving the climate accords or driving personally owned vehicles even though the USA has been and continues to exceed the world in carbon reduction, accord or not.

These people don't care about the environment, CO2 emissions, or truth. It is a convenient means to an end. Western culture, in particular, the US, capitalism must be dismantled at all cost.

The truth is they've already won. It is just the next generation that will reap this, not this one. That's a tough pill to swallow for Zoey the millennial Marxist Democrat who wants it now.

[–]NoobSter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So everything The USA and Europe have produced in China and India doesn't count for them? It's like child labour that Rebook uses, it's not their US customers who are for child labour... Nice rationale. Let's interfere everywhere to sell bombs but then turn a blind eye when those countries leave the American way and all want two cars, and stuff themselves and spend their days on their phones and computers. That doesn't count as USA pollution, ok i see the denial.

[–]AntiLowEffortHuman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

True that. India only cares about it's own pollution. New Delhi is full of smog which I'm sure is not news to you. Governments are trying to reduce that but not much beyond.

Efficient, tuned and fuel injected engines complying with certain standards, running on fuel complying with certain standards will never pollute as much as ships running on high sulphur diesel, and people burning stubbles.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The left will say whatever it thinks will stir up trouble. The "patriarchy" is now bad as clown world grows in insanity, but was great when men had to work and support families. It's still great when strength is needed to do a job. The left can't alter nature other than by brainwashing the gullible by constantly spewing words that incite anger.

[–]Only71Genders 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

At least he is honest that most environmental groups are fronts for communism. A vast majority of them don't give two shits about nature, the health of our ecosystem, or the pollution we are exposed to in food and water. They just want money and communism.

[–]NoobSter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The USA is communism, "everyone has the same potential, we are all equal in front of potential"

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think he's talking about something that greta said:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/greta-snaps-change-everything-climate-crisis-about-colonial-racist-and-patriarchal-systems-of-oppression-fossil-fuel-literally?%3Futm_source=twitter

Far-left climate extremist Greta Thunberg unloaded on the world in an op-ed published on Friday, claiming that fossil fuels “are literally” killing mankind, and that they are a threat to “our very existence” as she said that her “climate crisis” agenda is not just about the environment, but about fighting the “colonial, racist, and patriarchal systems of oppression.”

[–]zyxzevn 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

First: Nuclear fallout and garbage are really bad

Nuclear disasters were terrible, but they are also still top-secret.
In East Europe many children died or got strange diseases due to the fallout.
In Japan the effect on Sea-life has been devastating.

And the only solution to 100,000 years of nuclear garbage is to put it underground.

Money and science can not solve these problems.

CO2 Global warming = mistake by only a few scientists

The 98% is cherry-picked from many different articles with different conclusions.

There is a lot of pollution, and deforestation, which is of course bad. That is why many scientists did not mind this idea being promoted and data to be false. They do not understand the consequences of these lies.

In reality: the temperature changes are mainly caused by the energy cycles of the sun.
We had "global warming" 100 years ago. And 50 years ago there was global cooling.
Check the news from that time at: http://realclimatescience.com

While the science is clear how the sun influences the global climate, the scientists are not settled on it. Because they use 100 year old models of the sun.

From oil to global taxes

When Ford made his first cars they could be filled with alcohol. Something that every farmer could make. But that became forbidden soon after, and the Rockenfellers (etc) started to sell their oil.

Their business is not the sale of oil, but to create global monopolies on resources and currencies. They are mainly big bankers.

Currently the oil income is dropping. Replacements are slowly coming. And the US currency is less stable. The wars about oil in the middle-east are about linking the US dollar to oil. But that is going to end sometime.

So to replace them, they want to replacing oil with a global currency.

So this is what the energy-tax / CO2 tax is about: a global currency and taxation.

Check the corbett report for information about this. https://www.corbettreport.com/what-did-exxonknew-and-when-did-they-knew-it-question-for-corbett-048/

[–]useless_aether[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

good stuff! also, the how and why big oil conquered the world is very comprehensive from corbett.

i remember something about the first daimlers in europe being electric too using just lead acid batts.

[–]FollowTheMoney 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Someone said it already but these ideas/movements are manufactured to further the agenda of a global tax on industry via carbon credits. It doesn't solve the problem of pollution/deforestation, it's simply another taxation method being proposed to force oligopolic markets where only the select few corporations can pay these credit taxes. Imagine getting an allotment of carbon but you can pay your government more money to pay for monopoly credits to cover the cost of your "carbon footprint" i.e your pollution rate. It's absolute nonsense and the people that buy into it via this logic of it being a product of the oppressive patriarchy are straight up fools championing their own demise.

[–]useless_aether[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

it is more than just money. they want to control every aspect of our lives, what, how and when we consume, just about everything.. deciding who lives and dies ultimately. treating people like we don't have inherent rights. it is really about global genocide

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yep. The Eugenics oligarch end game.

[–]FollowTheMoney 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Perhaps you're right. In a way yes, if it trickled down to individuals based on socio-economic status only get an allotment of carbon credits to buy things with. The have nots will grow greater and those people will suffer more. But then you have mobilization and people rioting over that system. I hope people wake up before that point and it seems likely things will get better but they have to get worse imo. We're in the midst of this transition imo. You have US presidential candidates challenging establishment narratives and it's okay to go after these topics unlike in the early 2000's.

[–]FormosaOolong 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

CLEAN energy? What?! And it "only" creates this "clean" energy? No, it also is a front for nuclear weapon proliferation. Nuclear energy is a huge scam, when will people get this. Ask the people of Fukushima.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Hey bro! Climate change is a hoax. It's actually about global control of all resources.

It's the green mask.

Seriously bro. We've been had.

[–]FormosaOolong 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I ain't talkin' about climate change. I'm talking about the greenwashing of nuclear energy. It's a 100,000 yr long garbage dump, what with the nuclear waste, the potential for nuclear arms, the problem of decomissioning, and the inevitable meltdowns.