all 7 comments

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm sure this will be taken very seriously with many lengthy prison terms handed out /s

[–]cm18 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"Insurrection" - FTFY

Arrest them and file trespass charges.

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If they're leftists they'll completely get away with it and even receive praise, unlike the peaceful protesters on January 6th who were literally tricked into committing "insurrection".

[–]Drewski 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Let's not use their language, this wasn't an insurrection any more than Jan. 6.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Let's not use their language, this wasn't an insurrection any more than Jan. 6.

Yikes, did not intend for that to be taken literally, that was intended to be a completely sarcastic use of the word, although maybe this was less obvious than I realized. On reflection I probably should have put quotation marks around "insurrection" to make this more apparent. Duly noted

[–]Drewski 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Gotcha, sarcasm is a lot harder to convey (and recognize) over the internet. The article itself didn't seem like it was going for sarcasm to me, but I may have missed it.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, this was all a lot more clear in my own mind, lol. I added the word insurrection, I thought people would read this as 'see this is fundamentally the same thing as Jan6, yet nobody is calling it worse than 9/11 and it barely made the news', but looking at this I can totally see that I didn't do the best job of making myself clear, it does sound like I am serious