you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 14 insightful - 7 fun14 insightful - 6 fun15 insightful - 7 fun -  (24 children)

Haha, suck on that troons, people are going to get to see how they are radicalizing people with violent, hateful and psychotic rhetoric

[–][deleted]  (23 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Musky 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

    The Proud Boys has gay and minority members. What's their hateful rhetoric?

    [–][deleted]  (21 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]ShekelPa 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      Figures a fucking faggot is projecting their homo tendencies on others

      [–]Musky 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (18 children)

      I have read the Wikipedia page. Do you have any proof for your claim that the Proud Boys engages in hateful rhetoric, or is it just what you've been led to believe so you parrot it.

      [–][deleted]  (17 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]Musky 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

        I've read up on them. It appears they're the target of a deliberate smear campaign to vilify them for being a conservative values based organization for men. I don't agree with them, but their message is overall not awful. I again ask you to provide proof of your claim.

        [–][deleted]  (7 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]Musky 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

          You're feeling abused because your values are challenged and you cannot defend them. Makes you wonder if you have been misled about this, what else you've been misled about.

          Take the red pill, Neo.

          [–][deleted]  (5 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]Alphix 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

            Wikipedia has information? Last I looked it was mostly bullshit and propaganda. You got anything more reliable, like tea leaves maybe?

            [–][deleted]  (5 children)

            [deleted]

              [–]Alphix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

              But water is NOT wet. How would you wet water? It would have to be dry to begin with, and then there just isn't any water. Water is wetNESS, which is not the same thing. So there.

              Wikipedia is the perfect "source" for subversive forces to use in order to disinform and gaslight people. So yeah, tea leaves are a source too, by that standard.

              [–][deleted]  (3 children)

              [deleted]

                [–]HanssenBob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                You're a fucking idiot.