all 28 comments

[–]hfxB0oyA 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Gaddafi was trying to move to a gold standard for trading oil.

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And no one cared just like they don't care about people using Rubles to trade oil now.

[–]1Icemonkey 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I miss the colonel!

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

TFW you can't hold your own consulate

[–]Dunwidit 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

And he, like Kennedy found why you don't do that....😔

[–]ResidentCheezle 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Murica happened again.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The whole country had it's economy destroyed by sanctions following the Lockerbie bombings.

More than one person thinks that al-Megrahi was innocent.

The link to Hillary isn't obvious though. It's Regan / George H W era machinations.

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Gaddafi was arse raped to death with a knife by his own people. His spoilt brat, very much Western establishment kids were hunted down one by one after they tried their soft hands at being warlords.

The Lybian had no love of him.

Funny how all these freedom fighters in the West have no problem with other people being under the cosh of oppression if they can make some anti western spin out of it.

I worked near the Libyan embassy during the civil war. Exiled Libyans from all over the country made their way there to protest against the government. The Libyan government then responded by bussing in a couple of coaches of paid actors (remember that tactic) to protest for the government. And, yes, the real protestors were often physically attacked and threatened by the Embassy security if they were unwise enough to wander away from public view and cctv.

[–]dicknipples 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

True - but this was not related to Hilary. (She didn't control Israel, the US and NATO, ffs.) I initially upvoted this, but now see this dumb image.

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

Omar was killed under Obama's watch with Hillary as secretary of state.

[–]dicknipples 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Unrelated to the bigger picture, which they did not control

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Bullshit you fucking neocon dick licker. This quote is Hillary taking credit for killing Qaddafi.

[–]dicknipples 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

She was joking. You know she's not taking credit for that. You also know that US-led NATO troops and others were in Libya for reasons unrelated to her. And you know Israel wagged the dog on for that and other middle east conflicts. It's not that difficult to read memes that juxtapose unrelated images. You also know I'm not a neoconservative by any stretch of your feeble imagination. You know all of this and still prefer to make your usual ad hominem attacks. Weak. Remember when you banned users for their ad hominem statements? Remember that you did not ban the far right assholes who made ad hominem statements? Good that those days at Saidit are over...

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You support the Bidens. You support the Clintons. You are a neocon. QED.

[–]dicknipples 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

They're neoliberal (which means they - unfortunately - get along with Repugs, but not that they are neocons). AOC '24.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You support the Bidens. You support the Clintons. You are a neoliberal. QED.

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

They were puppets of the NWO.

[–]dicknipples 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

NWO is way too vague and no one knows what it is, nor does it necessarily exist in any form anyone can clearly identify

Specifically: Israel; France: Opération Harmattan; United Kingdom: Operation Ellamy; Canada: Operation Mobile; United States: Operation Odyssey Dawn; Belgium, Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Qatar, Spain, Greece and the United Arab Emirates

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

How about: I can't believe it's not the Illuminati? /s

[–]dicknipples 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

hahahaha

[–]EternalSunset 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–]Rah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

He was no angel. Financed lots of left socialist governments in Latin America and got cozy with Fidel. He wanted to promote socialism sans-America, which is why he got removed.

[–]1Icemonkey 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

He was removed to create a pathway for Africans to migrate to Europe. Ghadaffi was the only thing holding these jewish groups back from running these darkies through his country to the sea where catholic and jewish rafts await them.

[–]Rah 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not disagreeing.

[–]Alphix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

HE WAS NOT PERFECT <-- Perfect 'criticism' when the guy is generally doing right by his people but in doing so contravenes the "interests of the US ( read ZOG )"

Look at how 'well' they're doing without him. Do you think "being an angel" would have had better results? These people are tribal savages, keep that in mind.

[–]Rah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not giving money to fucking communists for starters would be fine.

[–]Alphix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Another of a rare breed of Great Leaders taken out by the Axis of Evil.

Lybia was not an ABSOLUTE PARADISE under his reign. But then again, compared to what? Lybians are primitive tribals, already that they had what they had was nothing short of miraculous.

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The history of Ghadaffi and trying to emancipate some parts of Africa from their oppressing bullies in the UN...

Under Bush, we Americans bombed the crap out of Libya in a huge botched attack killing bunches of civilians. We bombed Ghadaffi's house with his family, but he escaped, having been tipped off.

t was a late and disproportionate response to an attack at a UN partner, and France wanted an immediate bloody response, but we drug our feet. Lots of countries thought it was super fucked up to bomb all those civilians and stuff mostly unprovoked and we eventually apologized and Libya apologized for shooting down the plane, we exchanged some millions and billions for damages to families and tried to get along.

Ghadaffi was referee for so many very tense foreign relations in the middle East, that he was involved in almost everything. Instead of looking at the big picture of him maintaining stability, we were selfish about our short term imperialistic goals and felt he was doing bad.

We Americans tried to spin up a civil war to overthrow him, with our covert coups, like we do with everyone we don't like. The shitty terrorists we were working with told us to keep low, so we were covert. Yet, France wanted his head on a pike for offering those African nations a gold backed currently to use instead of Francs, which allowed France and the UN manipulative control of their trade and economy. So we continued to arm terrorists and other enemies of him, pushing a proxy war against him, like we usually do.

In the end, we were the restrained ones, by comparison. Under Obama, we and NATO bombed the country again, killing Ghadaffi's son and three grand sons, then chased him out of town all murderous cow-boy style chase scene, lobbing drone bombs, while chasing his convoy, until we chased them into our Libyan terrorists buddies' hands. They captured and torched him, publicly releasing a video of torturing him, including raping his ass with a sword, then he was killed. They later captured, tortured, and killed his other son.

The entire world thought this, again, was a evil and terrible event, demanding war crimes investigations. I assume not much was done. We know that as long as the media propaganda does well demonizing someone, any immoral act against them will be largely ignored. The results was Syria going to hell, NATO finished off Benghazi, and terrorists steadily gained power overrunning most of the Middle East for a decade or more to come. Obama declared the War On Terror and went on to drone-murder the rest.