you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Anman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Not only do I know all of these things (because any one with half a brain and interest in learning will know how), I also know it's a stupid comparison because you don't need a pencil to do the same thing a pencil can do.

YOU could not make an HB pencil. You could make some crude charcoal crayon or something

Or you could just get some ink and a feather.

The elite think something like 70% of us are 'useless eaters'.

I see it more as 90% of people are useless eaters. Including much of the so called elite.

It is still not disturbing, because this is exactly the natural order of things and has existed for thousands of years.

[–]Bigs[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The question was not 'can you scratch in the mud with your dick" but can you make a pencil?

And if you were of average intelligence you'd accept that no, you cannot. Instead you stick with the comfortable illusion that a pencil is so simple any idiot could make one, revealing that it would be a waste of my time to further explain it or help you understand. Thank you for your time anyway.

[–]Anman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I understand what you were trying to say, but it is completely not relevant to the original topic. That is my issue.

[–]Bigs[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Well I guess that depends upon if you consider the long-term harm of the vaccines to be relatively minor, causing a sizeable but nevertheless minority of people to suffer some health issues, or if you consider it to be, possibly, a slow-burning genocide of massive proportions.

Are you familiar with amyloids? Kind of like mad-cow prion disease, where proteins become misfolded. The kind of fuck-up you could make if you were stupid enough to create an mRNA drug with a 50/50 standard of purity, where it's literally a coin-flip if your cells produce the correct (and nasty) spike protein, or some other unknown shit, which might be benign or might be even nastier. You know, if you lived in a world where an agency upon hearing of that, would just lower the purity threshold to 50%.

The kind of thing that could create bizarre, rubbery blood-clots, or fuck up the heart muscle, leading to a drastically shorter life expectancy.

Since we're seeing embalmers talk of weird, rubbery blood clots, people getting cardiac issues, many dropping dead, and vaccinated countries all showing a steady, ongoing rise in excess deaths, even after the injections stop, we're obviously not facing an amyloid issue and it's just global warming, right?

So our pencil-making ability will continue long into the future; doncha worry about it!

Did you see the game last night? Was a cracker, eh?

Wot team you support?

PS: Oh looky: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/remember-i-thought-myocarditis-might

"The TI scout revealed earlier drop of myocardial signal in comparison to blood pool which raised the suspicion of amyloidosis, the delayed gadolinium enhancement revealed multiple subendocardial foci of microvascular occlusion (MVO) and failure of myocardial nulling even in high inversion time values (700 msec) involving all myocardium which confirmed the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis and on top acute microvascular occlusion."

Fucking global warming man. Cow farts.

[–]Anman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Wot team you support?

Please stop. You are embarrassing yourself.

We already knew what was going to happen with these injections years before when they first tested mrna therapy. And after all the test animals died and 3 people, they pulled the plug. Only to bring it back with no changes.

[–]Bigs[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So clotshots disturbing or not; you seem confused?

[–]Anman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No. Not at all. This is the same results that occurred when these injections were first tested many years ago. Like cutting a man in half and being disturbed at the fact he dies and all his organs pour out. What else were you expecting? Why did you even do it it in the first place? You didn't know that people are full of blood and organs and die when cut in half?